• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Share your in-room measurements?

TimH

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
18
Likes
14
1619121560459.png

This is the first time I taken a measurement with REW, I got a UMK-1 mic and gave it a shot - this is the graph I got once calibrated. I'm still learning how to read these so I'm sure there is some tweaking that could be done to improve things. Its for a pair of Meridian DSP 5000s
 

Vuki

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2018
Messages
342
Likes
393
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
View attachment 125676
This is the first time I taken a measurement with REW, I got a UMK-1 mic and gave it a shot - this is the graph I got once calibrated. I'm still learning how to read these so I'm sure there is some tweaking that could be done to improve things. Its for a pair of Meridian DSP 5000s
Nice. Just vertical scale should be corrected- usually it's 50dB not 120dB.
 

TimH

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
18
Likes
14
Thanks Vuki, now updated with the scale corrected. I need to double check these weren't using the centre speaker as well as the processor has a number of different room modes and I can't remember which was active. It will be interesting to see what kind of difference things like Meridians Tri-field setting make
1619165405696.png
 

Ingenieur

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
938
Likes
747
Location
PA
Here's mine. Very crude using the spectrum FFT app, pink noise and a frequency sweep.
Also used the ClapIR app. I have a Shiit Loki I used for minor trim.
Room: 34 x 14 x 8
Measured with iPhone X, from what I can find pretty accurate and low distortion up to 14 kHz range.
56042409-F12D-4A73-8D06-C590B1437E18.jpeg9452E0A2-3A00-4D99-BA70-1E007AEB093D.jpeg20BBC2FF-D6A0-4EA3-9796-049D5AEA207D.jpeg
 

TimH

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2021
Messages
18
Likes
14
I re-measured the Meridians as I didn't do separate left and right the first time around. I also might have had the centre channel active.....at least this time I know I didn't! Below is the average of 12 measurements. I'm trying to figure out how bad or good these are, they seem to be quite a way off the target in some cases, unfortunately I have no space whatsoever to move the speakers but could probably add some room treatment. The other option I need to try is resetting the Meridian amp as I have some room correction coming from that and some from REW, maybe it would be better to start with a clean slate? A few more speakers will be tested in the space this month so I'm intrigued to see if I can get better results. Would a sub also help out here?

Any advice would be much appreciated!

Tim
meridian_corrected.jpg
 

Cotina

New Member
Joined
May 16, 2021
Messages
1
Likes
0
Hi all!
First post here.
I've noticed that Linkwitz speakers are known here in ASR, so I thought I should share some measurements of my LX521.4, to whom might be interested.
6.3 x 4.1 x 2.7m living room, with quite some treatment and Dirac Live 3:

View attachment 105271
RT60:
View attachment 105272View attachment 105273View attachment 105274

And an alternative with a little more slope between 1-10kHz:
View attachment 105275

Quite happy with the overall sound, for a 2-channel system in a living room.
I like your post, can you help me whith Dirac? Do you use a Dsp, Asp? I,a using a Nadja Dsp.
 

AdamG

Debunking the “Infomercial” hawkers & fabricators
Moderator
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
4,709
Likes
15,505
Location
Reality

aglx

New Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2020
Messages
3
Likes
17
I like your post, can you help me whith Dirac? Do you use a Dsp, Asp? I,a using a Nadja Dsp.
Hi,
I use Hypex Dlcp as a DSP.
Dirac runs on a Mac mini, as a AU plug in, in Audirvana.
You can find instructions here:

macOS: Set up Dirac Processor Plugin for Systemwide Correction with BlackHole (Free) - Dirac Live Support - Confluence

Dirac Processor Plugin - Quick Start Guide - Dirac Live Support - Confluence

for Windows here:

Dirac Processor Standalone - Quick Start Guide - Dirac Live Support - Confluence

Dirac Live® 3 - Quick Start Guide - Dirac Live Support - Confluence

The setting up procedure is a little frustrating at the beginning, for inexperience users (like me), but it works at the end with some effort.
 

nick-v

Active Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
195
Likes
289
Pretty wild seeing what's possible with REW and Roon Convolution filters:

These are a pair of Monitor Audio SF2 (Sealed, 3-Way, On-Wall Art Speakers).

Monitor Audio SoundFrame2 (Before).png


And here they are after correction (and some serious shaping). I'm using up a ton of dynamic headroom with the huge low-end boost, but these are installed on the wall in the open concept dining nook/kitchen area and they sound so much better now. They're usable without subwoofer(s) with excellent extension. This system never gets turned up that loud, and it's just staggering what you can so with DSP and EQ these days. This is my first kick at it (only a few measurements averaged pre and post-correction). I'll do a more elaborate set of measurements pre and post correction and see what I can do.

Monitor Audio SF2 (After Correction Var smoothing).jpg
 

spacevector

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 3, 2019
Messages
553
Likes
1,003
Location
Bayrea
Woo! Channel matching seems good but those room modes looks nasty with high peaks and dips at the 100-200hz region
Indeed. I have changed houses since but new room is similarly small. I have not made measurements yet but expect same challenges, this time also with channel match since room isn't symmetric.

1622229084799.png
 

YSC

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
3,200
Likes
2,590
This is L+R for my 8030C+7040A with only dip switches tinkered at LP, seems reasonably nice to me without DSP
with 7040A measurement.jpg
 

richard12511

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
4,335
Likes
6,702
Pretty wild seeing what's possible with REW and Roon Convolution filters:

These are a pair of Monitor Audio SF2 (Sealed, 3-Way, On-Wall Art Speakers).

View attachment 132335

And here they are after correction (and some serious shaping). I'm using up a ton of dynamic headroom with the huge low-end boost, but these are installed on the wall in the open concept dining nook/kitchen area and they sound so much better now. They're usable without subwoofer(s) with excellent extension. This system never gets turned up that loud, and it's just staggering what you can so with DSP and EQ these days. This is my first kick at it (only a few measurements averaged pre and post-correction). I'll do a more elaborate set of measurements pre and post correction and see what I can do.

View attachment 132330

Ha! That is some serious shaping indeed. Software based EQ like that does have great potential.
 

YSC

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
3,200
Likes
2,590
After a day of fiddling with placement and the various dip switches without using any DSP, this is my final setting overlay with REW target curve, seems a bit bass heavy but can't get any better without DSP especially the 85-200hz range where the 8030C bass roll off can only do so much
 

Attachments

  • 8030+7040_tuned_overlay.jpg
    8030+7040_tuned_overlay.jpg
    97.6 KB · Views: 109

Ata

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
May 6, 2021
Messages
388
Likes
334
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Here are my latest measurements and corrections towards a desired house curve:

VAF L Speaker and Filters.jpg


I do have a couple of questions:

- What smoothing should I use when generating/tweaking the filters for the target curve in REW, Var/Psy/ERB or other?
- Are there better automated filter generators than REW, what other tools would you recommend?
- I am interested in using FIR convolution, for convenience with Audirvana/Roon and for greater accuracy and flexibility compared to a fixed number of PEQs. Is there any way to generate a convolution filter directly from the (smoothed) FR measurement?

Hope this makes sense!
 

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,856
Likes
16,786
Added a 10" CB sub I had in my storage room to my main KEF LS50 Meta setup today.

L and R measurements without it and only negative PEQ filter room correction below 300 Hz:

1624194438354.png


L and R measurements with it and only negative PEQ filter room correction below 300 Hz:

1624194516152.png


The audible difference in deep bass is of course huge when bass starts dropping under 30 Hz vs under 60 Hz.
 

YSC

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
3,200
Likes
2,590
Added a 10" CB sub I had in my storage room to my main KEF LS50 Meta setup today.

L and R measurements without it and only negative PEQ filter room correction below 300 Hz:

View attachment 136606

L and R measurements with it and only negative PEQ filter room correction below 300 Hz:

View attachment 136607

The audible difference in deep bass is of course huge when bass starts dropping under 30 Hz vs under 60 Hz.
yea, especially with the few songs you got that low bass content, for 20hz I didn't feel much desire though
 

changer

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 4, 2020
Messages
559
Likes
602
This is the room response of my DIY 2-way speakers with 12-inch Faital pro woofers, JBL waveguide on Celestion compression drivers and powered by Hypex FA123 modules (pics). Currently, I stopped advancing with the prototypes and decided to just listen and enjoy them for a while in their current state. I applied some room correction to the raw response with the in-build Hypex 8-band PEQ stage.

Measurements were conducted as moving mic measurements with pink noise and 1/48th RTA in REW, of course. The first picture shows individual channels pre-EQ and the corrected stereo sum (calculated, not recorded) of both channels post-EQ. Smoothed to 1/12 octave. PEQs where applied between 48-440 Hertz only.

Sum + pre-EQ.png


The second image shows equalized response of individual channels:

L-R 1-12th.png


Note this is a constant directivity design and the speaker has matched narrow directivity between something like 500-15000 Hertz, hence little room curve. It sounds right, though. Quasi-anaechoic response and other measurements are collected in my "I ask for help" thread over at diyaudio.com, here is the on-axis without room (gated to 4.5 ms):

961810d1624401050-digital-bsc-question-minimum-phase-png


I am happy to have learned about MMM, because averaging individual sweeps was kind of tricky. It has to be noted though that, due MMM not recording phase and impulse the summed response is RMS and not Vector so without phase and there might be more problems between 200-500 Hertz in my room when speaker response is summed correctly. Will dig into this another time.
 
Last edited:

Ata

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
May 6, 2021
Messages
388
Likes
334
Location
Adelaide, Australia
I am happy to have learned about MMM, because averaging individual sweeps was kind of tricky. It has to be noted though that, due MMM not recording phase and impulse the summed response is RMS and not Vector so without phase and there might be more problems between 200-500 Hertz in my room when speaker response is summed correctly. Will dig into this another time.

I am also a fan of the MMM method as it is sufficiently accurate and much faster than using multiple single points.

Your pre-EQ measurements look great for L+R while L and R individually are much less flat. In particular, in the 40-55 Hz area there may be some phase issue since the averaged results is a lot lower than the room mode for each of the speakers? I am not an expert, merely asking...
 
Top Bottom