That was just a hypothetical. It depends on the context of your system. If you’ve got some bookshelf speakers jammed up against your basement wall then the Crown will do just fine and differences will be minute. If you’ve got some huge Revels pulled well out into the room then I’d bet on the Levinson making a clear and positive difference.
Some years ago, in the 1990s, the late Tom Nousaine drove from Michigan to Florida to meet with the also late Steve Zipser, who owned a high end shop. The trip was the result of numerous exchanges online over audible differences between amplifiers and double-blind testing ("DBT").
Tom was armed with a low-rent Yamaha amplifier (might have been an integrated, I can't recall) and an ABX Comparator. Steve was armed with a top-of-the-line Pass amp.
Steve subjected himself to numerous DBTs, administered by Tom, in an effort to distinguish between the two amplifiers. Steve (who later related his side of things to me over dinner) failed miserably. Steve had not been a fan of DBTs, and I doubt the experience made one of him, but he was a decent enough sort that he didn't quibble. Well, too much anyway. And it was no a fun story for him to tell, so I applauded his honesty.
It would not be a stretch that a similar result would obtain between a Crown and a Levinson. I don't
know that would be the result, because I am unaware of those two amplifiers being compared in a DBT. But I suspect the result would be the same.
I
can report that I did an amplifier DBT in 2002. The comparison was between a B&K ST140 100w/ch amp (a well made but inexpensive amp), and an Electrocompaniet Ampliwire 100w/ch amp (a well made and pretty expensive amp). (Both amplifiers were mine.) I was unable to tell any difference, and the results were what one would expect from chance and guessing.