PenguinMusic
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2019
- Messages
- 622
- Likes
- 368
Hi solderdude,
Problem solved
Problem solved
Milesian : if I get you right, you're saying (probably as I do) that some people are "subjectively" believing that they hear differences (and if they believe they do, they are indeed hearing them) and that people saying "it cannot be measured so it cannot be" should leave them alone and let them hearing/beliving they are hearing differences?
Those are for cleaning the price tag.Only if you specify which DACs that might be and would issue the warning that from a medical p.o.v. one should never clean their ear canals with cotton swabs
It should be obvious by now that there’s a parameter that no one has yet discovered how to measure.
Uh huh.It should be obvious by now that there’s a parameter that no one has yet discovered how to measure. i will call it Audio-Umami. Some are more sensitive than others in discerning it’s subtlety. More power to them. They can listen, enjoy, and smile whilst others babble the worn out ‘snake-oil’ cliche.
Thank you. I’m glad someone else agrees.Uh huh.
Thank you. I’m glad someone else agrees.
It should be obvious by now that there’s a parameter that no one has yet discovered how to measure. i will call it Audio-Umami. Some are more sensitive than others in discerning it’s subtlety. More power to them. They can listen, enjoy, and smile whilst others babble the worn out ‘snake-oil’ cliche.
I will call it gullible-plonkeri will call it Audio-Umami
What are the survey sizes of these blind tests? What is the margin of error? In successive rounds were both sources listed as both option A and B / 1 & 2? What was the age of the participants? what was the listening environment like? Was everyone in the same location of the listening environment? What was the content of the tests? What was the wording of the subsequent survey? how many times was the test repeated?The parameter that disappears in level matched blind tests you mean ?
I am sure somebody who has access to test results can give you links but I was cured of audiophilia nervosa by doing it for myself.What are the survey sizes of these blind tests? What is the margin of error? In successive rounds were both sources listed as both option A and B / 1 & 2? What was the age of the participants? what was the listening environment like? Was everyone in the same location of the listening environment? What was the content of the tests? What was the wording of the subsequent survey? how many times was the test repeated?