RogerSmith
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2025
- Messages
- 138
- Likes
- 284
SoundSource on Mac let´s you do it, a feature I really like.The app apparently lets you A/B your PEQ in real time. I wish Roon could do that.
SoundSource on Mac let´s you do it, a feature I really like.The app apparently lets you A/B your PEQ in real time. I wish Roon could do that.
Yes, I don't like having to pay for Soundsource when EQAPO is free on PC, but if you are going to spend $XXX or $YYYY on gear to listen on your mac, another $40 for proper PEQ is worth it.SoundSource on Mac let´s you do it, a feature I really like.
Anyone else noticing weird compression in Adaptive with included dongle? Switching between BT from my phone and the dongle sounds completely different.
Interesting, I'm between aptx hd and adaptive from phone bt to dongle.No. It sound the same to me. Not really surprising since AAC is probably transparent enough. The real issue with the dongle is still that you either use the dongle or you dont use it for 2 devices. It is not possible to mix usage with and without dongle. For me it just renders it not usable.
quote: I can point to one small gripe, it’s that you can’t use multipoint to use the headphones with two devices at once, with one device connected to Bluetooth and the other connected via the BTD 700.
Make sure the slider is on the left indicating ANC 100%. If the slider is in the middle, toggling between off and user defined shows no effect.ANC seems also bugged. On or off has no effect. Only when I switch the ant wind off I get some noise reduction.
There is always room for improvement, but among all the companion apps for headphones, it's one of the better. However, I must admit that I spent some time figuring out how to disable the auto-pause function when turning on transparency.Sennheiser really needs to work on their software.
Oh .. That's a cool product ! Id not seen it before .. thanks.I have the FIIO UTWS5 which has similar DSP functions and can be backed up. I use it with Planar IEMs.
I didn't realize it has crossfeed too, that's very appealing IMO. but we're still talking about the HDB630 and not the cloud X, right?
The Sony headphones have EQ but only graphic which I find not super useful.
To me crossfeed makes the stereo image seem more continuous and realistic rather than hard panned or straight in the middle. Very small trade-off in tonality. I use it in my desktop setup, too.
I think latency is overrated as a problem for BT headphones unless you know you're really sensitive to it, or you intend to record with them. Lip sync problems don't always become obvious until 200ms+ ... If you're just on a plane or train watching a movie, it should be fine.
quote: I can point to one small gripe, it’s that you can’t use multipoint to use the headphones with two devices at once, with one device connected to Bluetooth and the other connected via the BTD 700.
That's not correct. On the app's main page, there is a connection management feature where you can activate Multipont, and both devices (the currently connected phone and dongle) are displayed there. It works pretty much flawlessly, just tested it with my MacBook (Dongle) and iPhone. I mean, it's not as convenient as AirPods, but it works. I've also tested it successfully with my Lenovo in the office.
Make sure the slider is on the left indicating ANC 100%. If the slider is in the middle, toggling between off and user defined shows no effect.
There is always room for improvement, but among all the companion apps for headphones, it's one of the better. However, I must admit that I spent some time figuring out how to disable the auto-pause function when turning on transparency.
He said "vast majority". I dont see anything wrong with that.
Welcome! You new here?… What is it with ASR and every thread devolving into this bottomless argument scenarios
He said:
"I would take this over most of the high-end closed back, ya know, $1,000+ audiophile wired headphones"
Quantifying it as "only" most high-end closed backs at or above $1,000 does nothing to allay previously stated issues.
We have a claim that a $180 pair of headphones is better than the most of the high end headphones in the $1,000+ range with zero detail or comparisons provided to those headphones.
I don't understand your angle here, are you saying it's fine for reviewers to make crazy bold claims and then provide nothing to back them up?
I see nothing wrong here. Most +1000$ closed backs are crap. No surprise that a cheaper on where you have DSP and someone actually cared a bit about a remotely good tuning is not surprising. The FiiO FT1 also als better that most of the +1000$ high end headphones. His claim may be bold but he has a point and it is far from crazy.
The FiiO FT1 also als better that most of the +1000$ high end headphones.
It’s very frustrating that every YouTube review I’ve seen of this headphone seem to claim or at least heavily implicy that these headphones do lossless audio over Bluetooth (aptX lossless) - presumably because the DONGLE supports it but the headphones don’t. Same with the AptX low latency mode.
It’s a bit dissapointing - I know you probably couldn’t tell, but it’s a little unsatisfactory that the headphones don’t support all the features of the included dongle.
I do have a real problem with Sennheiser’s marketing team being very active and commenting on many of these videos - without pointing out the mistakes. That feels like misleading marketing to me.
I almost bought this headphone assuming it supported low latency mode - so I figuren I’d be great for gaming too - because that’s what reviewers claim. But they don’t. Sennheiser’s marketing team should really point those mistakes out if they’re going to be commenting on reviews.
I would’ve already bought it if that were the case. It’s truly odd that no headphone does both: you can either have gaming headphones with a 2.4ghz dongle but they’ll sound bad, or other headphones but they’ll he bluetooth and so unusable for gaming because of the lag.Really they should have gone 2.4 GHz or at least LDAC. Basically kills any use they could have had for gaming as every other headset geared towards that is going to have much lower latency.
I would have paid more for lower latency and truly lossless playback.
You fail to grasp that it is not the claim but the lack of substantiation, as I've pointed out 3 times now. Their claims are empty if they cannot specify the technicalities that make them equal or superior.
That's an opinion shared by no one else. Good up to maybe $500 closed backs, let alone all open and closed back models.