Absolutely NOT.
This is a common but wrong point of view based on an illogical train of thought.
As long as we use the same ears to listen to things in everyday life changing the hifi to make a sound different to real life would obviously sound completely unnatural and wrong to anybody, whatever the state of their hearing.
I see this sort of comment over and over again and it does not make the tiniest bit of scientific sense.
It is far more likely that younger people haven't heard much, if any, live music in their lives and turning up the bass is what we do when we are young (I did), particularly if we are only used to only listening to music over little speakers.
Deliberately altering the frequency response may sound "nice", it may be "preferred" by a majority of people.
That does not make it more accurate, it makes it more euphonic.
It is not high fidelity IMO or IME.
I tried with lound level on a pair of HE-500 hifiman and the HD800, I can't hear bass below 40hz, and that with the default setting both the HE500 (which is similar to HE6 in tyll's measurement in bass) and the HD800 sounds already bassy to me, any higher would sound like extra bass boost to make it bass heavy, similar to the balance on the 8030C without EQ or using switches and placed very close to rear wall getting the 6db boost.
and from what I read from the Harman curve it's more or less a preference curve by individuals and the default curve are mostly young guys, which from experience tend to prefer some very bass heavy pub music? in that sense it seems to me the curve is actually deviates from bass neutral in a well treated studio setup.
Thus my question to the measurement is that the harman curve while makes the preference for most ppl, is not what we target for a perceivable neutral tuning?
I do agree that measurements are important but the Harman target never seems right to me, once tried using that and ended up my phones sounds like XBS series from Sony with advertised massive bass boost.. and for bass level when I found Hifiman, UERR with capitol studio tuning it and the sennheiser hd800 are all at similar levels I tend to believe that’s what perceived neutral is and the harman is what makes it sounds nice maybe with some head shaking feel from massive bass boostHi YSC,
there are actually different Harman target curves, as they updated it over the years, increasing the bass level.
There are two things which I see as important :
- vocal communication is essential to humans, and in the presence there is indeed the less variability, i.e. deviation from neutrality in this area is certainly more wrong than in other areas
- studies were made several decades ago (I think they were described in AES papers), they showed differences re. different places in the world. These studies were made in the USA, several Western European countries and Japan, re. what they perceived as right, neutral.
People in the USA would go for an elevated bass, while those in Japan for elevation in the treble. People in Western Europe were in between, expecting the bass levels similar to those of the Japanese, but treble levels similar to those of the North-Americans.
In any case, while any scientifically-based target curve may not be represent an absolute neutrality, it will always be infinitely better than the praises of those numerous "audiophile" reviewers who rely entirely on their hearing without any measurements and get paid in money, or in the form of advertisements (to their site or to their magazine) or in the form of receiving expensive devices for free (selling them afterwards) , and never being clearly negative about these devices they get to review for financial interest.
If your hearing is damaged you wear a hearing aid. It corrects hearing in one or both ears. It makes "real life" sound better - more natural; that is, you have a better shot at not missing the perception of sounds which are actually there.
If the damage is to one ear, as in a friend's case, one could eq the recordings themselves (fix the problem in the flac files permanently via Audacity, for example) or perform simple eq whilst listening by altering the balance on the headphones. Clearly this creates a difference between "real life" (ie non-headphone use) and music listening. It manifestly does not make the sound "completely unnatural and wrong" - at least, not to the hearing-damaged person. It would to you and I - it would make one channel sound too loud - but obviously this discussion is limited to the single subject performing and experiencing the alterations. For them, it's correcting a problem. Like wearing a pair of glasses.
And again, obviously most eq is not of the form of massively increasing the volume in one ear; it's boosting this frequency, attenuating that. The principle is exactly the same, though.
Listening whilst wearing a hearing aid, if one needs one, is the same since YOU USE THE HEARING AID TO LISTEN TO REAL LIFE AS WELL
Bass is in music like sugar in food. Addictive. Excessive consumption - and the norms of excess are constantly revised - harms the intellect. You yourself know that.elevated bass
Once there, this headphone is doing something I don't hear with any speaker system and not yet on any headphone. It manages to provide a spooky layering and I guess I should say clarity that is not only surprisingly but delightful. I don't know if the effect will be too much if it comes across a lot of music but so far, I can't help but liking it and liking it a lot.
On a comfort side the HD800S is a delight. I find a lot of other headphone confining but not the 800S. Combine this with the post Equalization and you have a headphone I don't want to part with!
Here is a great track to use to test the above effect:
This track just sounds stunning with the HD800S and above equalization. There is deep bass, wonderfully clean highs and that great instrument separation.
Did you test the special Christmas chocolate edition?I was surprised how they just melted on my head the moment I put them on
It's unclear whether equalising two different headphones to the exact same target on the exact same test rig will produce the exact same frequency response at your own eardrum.
I think you're wrong for two reasons:I dislike reviewing of headphones just about as I expected to on ASR. That field isn't on firm ground scientifically the way loudspeaker design is.
So much extra money for less accurate response needing EQ, but better subjective layering so recommended. Sounds more like something on SBAF than what belongs here. I think such continued reviewing will undermine what is otherwise the strong basis for so much reviewing of other gear on ASR. You'll end up having to use the same iffy practices to get a practical headphone review as is done elsewhere, but they don't limit it to headphones, rather having iffy practices for all gear. And people will be inclined to disbelief the best part of ASR when it suits them, because the site's owner does so himself on headphones.
Well they better be at their price I'm pretty sure if some kind member send them for testing Amir would be able to prioritize it so the owner wouldn't have to wait months for them being returned..One of the very few headphones that is even better is the HE-1.
I hear some french gentlemen gnashing their teeth..Some TOTL headphones come close (Utopia for instance and some stats) but are pricier than HD800(S).
I'm consistently surprised how accurate your measurement rig is compared to other, more expensive setups. Well done.Yep, even when EQ'ed properly in tonal balance the HD800(S) is simply a step above most other headphones. The imaging and detail retrieval have a sense of realism that the vast majority of headphones simply doesn't reach. I like to call this 'effortless' sound. One of the very few headphones that is even better is the HE-1.
Some TOTL headphones come close (Utopia for instance and some stats) but are pricier than HD800(S).
Perhaps, strange as it seems, the HD800 (no S) with EQ is a budget T.O.T.L. headphone
The imaging and detail retrieval have a sense of realism that the vast majority of headphones simply doesn't reach.
It's probably due to your age (no offense intended ). You don't hear the higher frequencies as well as you used to and more bass drowns them out even more. If you still hear the treble loud and clearly you need some extra bass to compensate.
While age has no impact on headphone preference as a whole, it does have an effect on bass and treble preferences.This is ridiculous.
I still listen to real life with the same ears I use to listen to my hifi.
I have seen this sort of comment before about compensating for age related hearing loss and there is not even a tiny glimmer of logic to it.
My reference is the outside world and the many, many more concerts I have been to since I was young and, hence, a much keener knowledge of what real acoustic music, as opposed to music from speakers, actually sounds like.
Any relationship with my age is more knowledge and experience. When I was young and had pretty well only heard music over speakers, and almost exclusively pop music at that, I am sure I would have liked the preference curve Harman have assembled from a lot of listeners.
Now I am very much more knowledgeable and experienced I definitely do not.
Talking preference back in the day nearly everybody I knew had the "loudness" contour on and/or the bass turned up. "Preference" IME has little to do with accurate reproduction.
It's likely the large angled drivers and the greater distance between them and the concha.If it isn't FR and/or distortion, what is it? How does one explain or quantify imaging and detail retrieval? Just a rhetorical question I guess as my subjective experience matches yours and, worse (at least in the ASR/Harman preference score context), I get a similar feeling about loudspeakers...
As @Blumlein 88 stated above, it seems headphone reviews may lead us into the dangerous "measures worse but sounds better" territory.
Let's give it some time, but if that mantra applies to headphones, it will become harder to argue it doesn't potentially apply to everything else...
It's likely the large angled drivers and the greater distance between them and the concha.