My point is that everything we hear has a correlated suite of measures - sonic, physiologic and psycho-acoustic.
What is far harder to measure is how what we hear makes us feel. Often, we conflate sonic terms with experiential ones. “Character” can mean one thing in acoustic terms but something else altogether in experiential terms.
For example: I like some Klipsch speakers because they remind me of the experience of live music. Their measurements point to specific things in terms of directivity, sensitivity, room reflections and frequency response that might evoke that remembrance.
It’s entirely clear when one set of speakers has those characteristics and one set does not. It’s measurable.
What is far harder to measure is how what we hear makes us feel. Often, we conflate sonic terms with experiential ones. “Character” can mean one thing in acoustic terms but something else altogether in experiential terms.
For example: I like some Klipsch speakers because they remind me of the experience of live music. Their measurements point to specific things in terms of directivity, sensitivity, room reflections and frequency response that might evoke that remembrance.
It’s entirely clear when one set of speakers has those characteristics and one set does not. It’s measurable.