• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Sennheiser HD560S Review (Headphone)

Rate this headphone:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 5 1.1%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 26 5.5%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 179 37.7%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 265 55.8%

  • Total voters
    475
Ordered one more time hd 560s to compare with 660s.

660s sound more full, except recessed treble. And gives more natural sound. But even after equalization it's timbre is mellow and soft. When listening to hard rock and dynamic heavy metal, I wish more readable sound, more sharpness. Even being equalized, 660s provides soft pleasant treble.

Contrary, hd 560s is giving sharp and readable sound with more deep bass and less mid bass. But when listening to jazz, acoustic pop, voices are sharper and thinner because of raised up-mid and low treble and (i guess) 3 blob effect... Even after equalization sound character doesn't change to mellow and soft.

So 660s is feeling more pleasant and consistent for ears anyway. A class up from 560s.

Searching through internet about good headphones for a digital piano, I've found many recommendations about 560s. And I agree that 560s are great for synths and piano even while having brighter then neutral sound signature. 660s are dark and natural sounding so timbres will be mellower/darker then they are in reality. For pianists it doesn't really matter.
 
Last edited:
Ordered one more time hd 560s to compare with 660s.

660s sound more full, except recessed treble. And gives more natural sound. But even after equalization it's timbre is mellow and soft. When listening to hard rock and dynamic heavy metal, I wish more readable sound, more sharpness. Even being equalized, 660s provides soft pleasant treble.

Contrary, hd 560s is giving sharp and readable sound with more deep bass and less mid bass. But when listening to jazz, acoustic pop, voices are sharper and thinner because of raised up-mid and low treble and (i guess) 3 blob effect... Even after equalization sound character doesn't change to mellow and soft.

So 660s is feeling more pleasant and consistent for ears anyway. A class up from 560s.

Searching through internet about good headphones for a digital piano, I've found many recommendations about 560s. And I agree that 560s are great for synths and piano even while having brighter then neutral sound signature. 660s are dark and natural sounding so timbres will be mellower/darker then they are in reality. For pianists it doesn't really matter.
I'm just gonna respond to one bit of your post, because I don't think it's worth addressing the other stuff. HD560s does not have the "3-blob" effect (a comment on the soundstange & imaging) that is quite often mentioned in relation to the HD6XX lineup (HD600/650/6XX/ (&660s too I think as also no angled drivers/pads)).
 
Ordered one more time hd 560s to compare with 660s.

660s sound more full, except recessed treble. And gives more natural sound. But even after equalization it's timbre is mellow and soft. When listening to hard rock and dynamic heavy metal, I wish more readable sound, more sharpness. Even being equalized, 660s provides soft pleasant treble.

Contrary, hd 560s is giving sharp and readable sound with more deep bass and less mid bass. But when listening to jazz, acoustic pop, voices are sharper and thinner because of raised up-mid and low treble and (i guess) 3 blob effect... Even after equalization sound character doesn't change to mellow and soft.

So 660s is feeling more pleasant and consistent for ears anyway. A class up from 560s.

Searching through internet about good headphones for a digital piano, I've found many recommendations about 560s. And I agree that 560s are great for synths and piano even while having brighter then neutral sound signature. 660s are dark and natural sounding so timbres will be mellower/darker then they are in reality. For pianists it doesn't really matter.
for the price of 660s, you could've gotten the 560s & 6xx which does everything and more!
 
for the price of 660s, you could've gotten the 560s & 6xx which does everything and more!
Good point, and in my experience you can narrow that down even further & just say HD560s with EQ. (I do own HD600 which is effectively HD6XX, at least in terms of overall potential albeit with slightly different frequency response, but we have EQ.).
 
[...] Even being equalized, 660s provides soft pleasant treble.
[...] Even after equalization sound character doesn't change to mellow and soft.
Admittedly I dont own these headphones, but both are considered fine and I am sure that it is possible to equalize the 560s in a way that its treble is soft, as well as you could equalize the 660s in a way that its treble is bright / harsh. To my knowledge there are no technical reasons why this should not be possible.

So, can you tell me what do you mean by "after being equalized"?
When did you reach the point at the 560s which made you think "I cannot improve the timbre of the 560s by equalizing, it is useless to try anymore"?

I ask that because it often appears to me that many people do not understand what equalizing is capable of.
 
Admittedly I dont own these headphones, but both are considered fine and I am sure that it is possible to equalize the 560s in a way that its treble is soft, as well as you could equalize the 660s in a way that its treble is bright / harsh. To my knowledge there are no technical reasons why this should not be possible.

So, can you tell me what do you mean by "after being equalized"?
When did you reach the point at the 560s which made you think "I cannot improve the timbre of the 560s by equalizing, it is useless to try anymore"?

I ask that because it often appears to me that many people do not understand what equalizing is capable of.

HD 6xx is not being sold in Europe. No no option. At the moment in Poland I can order 660s for 340 USD, 600th for 320 USD and 650th for about 350USD )))

560s doesn't have tenderness and depth of 6** series. Especially at vocals perspective. 6** pads are deeper, treble is soft.
 

Sennheiser HD560S.pdf

Shared with Dropbox
www.dropbox.com
www.dropbox.com
Hello, English is not my native language, and I can't figure out from this document how to set up the equalizer for my 560s headphones :( . If you have the opportunity, please advise which equalizer to use and how to adjust its sliders, preferably with a photo. Thank you in advance, dear friends.
 
Beeg update
 
There is already an active discussion about this in another topic (including the author of the website you are linking to).
Maybe we could continue to discuss the changes in there.
 
These headphones are down to just £119 on Amazon in UK (Prime Day deal):
 
Another one to add to the collection? ;)
I know! I bought another one just a few days ago though (bad timing I suppose!) :facepalm: Yes, so I bought the new version that has a shorter cable (they're all like that now), because I wanted to see if the reports of different measurements & sound were correct, and also because it would mean the new version should sound better without EQ than the old version, so would be useful to use for times when not using EQ. I have measured the new version a couple days ago, and it's very similar to what solderdude found when he measured the new version. I'll be posting up my results when I've got it all together and have some time. I'll also be posting up an EQ that will turn new version into old version so that it can be better combined with an Oratory EQ, as Oratory has measured mainly the old version of the HD560s.
 
Hi folks, I've posted up the results of my measurement of the new version vs old version at following thread where new version is being discussed:
 
@amirm
Any suggestion for "translating" your EQ profile into just 4 PEQ bands (limit of the Wiim Pro)? Thanks in advance.
 
@amirm
Any suggestion for "translating" your EQ profile into just 4 PEQ bands (limit of the Wiim Pro)? Thanks in advance.
You can use https://autoeq.app/ to calculate the ideal 4-band PEQ filter.

Just select the HD560S as headphone and Harman Over Ear 2018 as target, then choose Custom Parametric Eq for the Equalizer and enter the minimum and maximum frequency, gain, and Q values that you can select in the WiiM App into each filter band:
Screenshot_20231125-144545_Chrome.png Screenshot_20231125-144528_Chrome.png

You can experiment with leaving the first and last band as shelf filters or making them Peak filters as well. Whatever gives you the best result.
 
You can use https://autoeq.app/ to calculate the ideal 4-band PEQ filter.

Just select the HD560S as headphone and Harman Over Ear 2018 as target, then choose Custom Parametric Eq for the Equalizer and enter the minimum and maximum frequency, gain, and Q values that you can select in the WiiM App into each filter band:
View attachment 329284 View attachment 329285

You can experiment with leaving the first and last band as shelf filters or making them Peak filters as well. Whatever gives you the best result.
Thank you. I noticed the adjustable "bass boost" is pre-configured @ +6 - is this the Harman standard?
 
Back
Top Bottom