Demo from my synth which sound veiled on 660s and misses pleasure from open treble. Interesting to hear your impression on listening with 560s.
Last edited:
I'm just gonna respond to one bit of your post, because I don't think it's worth addressing the other stuff. HD560s does not have the "3-blob" effect (a comment on the soundstange & imaging) that is quite often mentioned in relation to the HD6XX lineup (HD600/650/6XX/ (&660s too I think as also no angled drivers/pads)).Ordered one more time hd 560s to compare with 660s.
660s sound more full, except recessed treble. And gives more natural sound. But even after equalization it's timbre is mellow and soft. When listening to hard rock and dynamic heavy metal, I wish more readable sound, more sharpness. Even being equalized, 660s provides soft pleasant treble.
Contrary, hd 560s is giving sharp and readable sound with more deep bass and less mid bass. But when listening to jazz, acoustic pop, voices are sharper and thinner because of raised up-mid and low treble and (i guess) 3 blob effect... Even after equalization sound character doesn't change to mellow and soft.
So 660s is feeling more pleasant and consistent for ears anyway. A class up from 560s.
Searching through internet about good headphones for a digital piano, I've found many recommendations about 560s. And I agree that 560s are great for synths and piano even while having brighter then neutral sound signature. 660s are dark and natural sounding so timbres will be mellower/darker then they are in reality. For pianists it doesn't really matter.
for the price of 660s, you could've gotten the 560s & 6xx which does everything and more!Ordered one more time hd 560s to compare with 660s.
660s sound more full, except recessed treble. And gives more natural sound. But even after equalization it's timbre is mellow and soft. When listening to hard rock and dynamic heavy metal, I wish more readable sound, more sharpness. Even being equalized, 660s provides soft pleasant treble.
Contrary, hd 560s is giving sharp and readable sound with more deep bass and less mid bass. But when listening to jazz, acoustic pop, voices are sharper and thinner because of raised up-mid and low treble and (i guess) 3 blob effect... Even after equalization sound character doesn't change to mellow and soft.
So 660s is feeling more pleasant and consistent for ears anyway. A class up from 560s.
Searching through internet about good headphones for a digital piano, I've found many recommendations about 560s. And I agree that 560s are great for synths and piano even while having brighter then neutral sound signature. 660s are dark and natural sounding so timbres will be mellower/darker then they are in reality. For pianists it doesn't really matter.
Good point, and in my experience you can narrow that down even further & just say HD560s with EQ. (I do own HD600 which is effectively HD6XX, at least in terms of overall potential albeit with slightly different frequency response, but we have EQ.).for the price of 660s, you could've gotten the 560s & 6xx which does everything and more!
Admittedly I dont own these headphones, but both are considered fine and I am sure that it is possible to equalize the 560s in a way that its treble is soft, as well as you could equalize the 660s in a way that its treble is bright / harsh. To my knowledge there are no technical reasons why this should not be possible.[...] Even being equalized, 660s provides soft pleasant treble.
[...] Even after equalization sound character doesn't change to mellow and soft.
Admittedly I dont own these headphones, but both are considered fine and I am sure that it is possible to equalize the 560s in a way that its treble is soft, as well as you could equalize the 660s in a way that its treble is bright / harsh. To my knowledge there are no technical reasons why this should not be possible.
So, can you tell me what do you mean by "after being equalized"?
When did you reach the point at the 560s which made you think "I cannot improve the timbre of the 560s by equalizing, it is useless to try anymore"?
I ask that because it often appears to me that many people do not understand what equalizing is capable of.
Hello, English is not my native language, and I can't figure out from this document how to set up the equalizer for my 560s headphones
I have Windows 10 x64@SergeiF do you use Windows 11?
I know! I bought another one just a few days ago though (bad timing I suppose!)Another one to add to the collection?![]()
You can use https://autoeq.app/ to calculate the ideal 4-band PEQ filter.@amirm
Any suggestion for "translating" your EQ profile into just 4 PEQ bands (limit of the Wiim Pro)? Thanks in advance.
Thank you. I noticed the adjustable "bass boost" is pre-configured @ +6 - is this the Harman standard?You can use https://autoeq.app/ to calculate the ideal 4-band PEQ filter.
Just select the HD560S as headphone and Harman Over Ear 2018 as target, then choose Custom Parametric Eq for the Equalizer and enter the minimum and maximum frequency, gain, and Q values that you can select in the WiiM App into each filter band:
View attachment 329284 View attachment 329285
You can experiment with leaving the first and last band as shelf filters or making them Peak filters as well. Whatever gives you the best result.