- Thread Starter
- #221
Were you able to hear the effect of that 16 kHz filter?
I'm not sure about what you are referring to.Were you able to hear the effect of that 16 kHz filter?
O I think I understand. Yes, the 16KHz was noticeable but I had to max it out to get a pronounced effect. The bass does not go very low and so I just minimized that to help alleviate the clipping issue.Were you able to hear the effect of that 16 kHz filter?
No, I never used the parametric EQ. I have not approached that option yet.Is that a graphic EQ? I don't see Q factors for any filter.
I'd set the zero db point at 2khz and take everything else down accordingly, drop the 16khz to the same as 8khz---doubt there's all that much to hear up there---so the eq is set to something closer to the correct overall levels. I'd probably also drop the 166hz control down a couple of db, that headphone is particularly muddy down there. I've got the HD 599, very similar.Here are the PEQ settings for my Sennheiser HD 598SR. I have not had time to extensively adjust the Q and stuff but that's coming. View attachment 156602
Alrighty... I adjusted accordingly and found it's not all that bad and so am testing it out.I'd set the zero db point at 2khz and take everything else down accordingly, drop the 16khz to the same as 8khz---doubt there's all that much to hear up there---so the eq is set to something closer to the correct overall levels. I'd probably also drop the 166hz control down a couple of db, that headphone is particularly muddy down there. I've got the HD 599, very similar.
I'm sorry: what I mean is "Take 2khz as the 0db point, taking all other levels down by the same amount. Once I saw the actual level adjustments [wasn't paying attention to the scale or the levels] I checked out Amir's EQ. Looks like 2k needed a boost anyway. These settings would get closer to what he came up with. Now that I'm looking again and seeing how you have eq-ed, let's try this:Alrighty... I adjusted accordingly and found it's not all that bad and so am testing it out.
View attachment 156636
Please do, I believe aftermarket pads changed FR significantlyCame across this review and was sad to see the alternate pads being used.
I have the original HD598 with original velour pads. It is one of my favorite headphones, I love them even more than my HD650s. Everyone who listens to them is impressed by their smooth and fun sound signature. They're a true classic and I would never sell them.
I'm happy to send them over to Amir if he wants to test them.
Came across this review and was sad to see the alternate pads being used.
I have the original HD598 with original velour pads. It is one of my favorite headphones, I love them even more than my HD650s. Everyone who listens to them is impressed by their smooth and fun sound signature. They're a true classic and I would never sell them.
I'm happy to send them over to Amir if he wants to test them.
These measurements and review should have been deleted IMO.
At least until the stock pads could have been tested with it too.
This is almost a bit unfair to Sennheiser.
There is no way they would release a headphone with those kind of measurements.
The HD-598 we all know and love sounds nothing like what is shown in those measurements.
I've owned one for a few years and if anything, it is actually bass light, but sounds great overall.
I also prefer it to my HD-650. The only reason I no longer have it is the plastic frame broke.
I've always been tempted to buy another. I miss it a lot.
I mean you could have at least put in the title (Aftermarket pads).
BTW the only thing I disliked about the HD-598 is the original yellowish color.
It reminded me of one of those old discolored Super Nintendos!
Would be fun to compare these to the newer AKG K612 Pro.
They have a lot of similarities.
Before the K712 and Q701 came out, most people preferred the more neutral sound of the K601 to the K701/K702.
I've had the Q701 bass mod in place for years and to me I even prefer it to the K712.
If you can believe it I just threw away two K400s