Selkirks
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2022
- Messages
- 243
- Likes
- 583
Most of my music listening is Electronic and Hip-Hop. For my tastes, bass is one of the best parts of the HD 480 Pro.
-
Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
Sennheiser HD 480 Pro
- Thread starter jean-benoit
- Start date
Most of my music listening is Electronic and Hip-Hop. For my tastes, bass is one of the best parts of the HD 480 Pro.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2021
- Messages
- 3,195
- Likes
- 6,805
Oh dear …..
, I probably shouldn’t have watched it at 2x
dumbsuck
Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2022
- Messages
- 39
- Likes
- 46
The HD 480 Pro look really good. I might just buy them to try them and maybe even keep them.
Regarding Heaphones.com and their reviews and videos: The only thing I've ever learned from them is that the way I hear is miles different from what they hear and what their measurements show, so anything they publish or say about the sound of any headphones is absolutely useless to me. One example is their insistence on how inferior the HD660S2 is to HD650/HD600 while to me the HD660S2 is miles ahead of the HD650 in sound quality. Historically Tyll's (Innerfidelity) and Unheardlab's (sai.squig.link) measurements have always represented how I heard a headphone the best, while the likes of the guys from headphones.com and oratory1990 (and others) I can straight up just ignore because these are always miles away from what I hear. Shows that a million people hear stuff in a million different ways. But I do get they do a lot of work around headphone measurements.
Regarding Heaphones.com and their reviews and videos: The only thing I've ever learned from them is that the way I hear is miles different from what they hear and what their measurements show, so anything they publish or say about the sound of any headphones is absolutely useless to me. One example is their insistence on how inferior the HD660S2 is to HD650/HD600 while to me the HD660S2 is miles ahead of the HD650 in sound quality. Historically Tyll's (Innerfidelity) and Unheardlab's (sai.squig.link) measurements have always represented how I heard a headphone the best, while the likes of the guys from headphones.com and oratory1990 (and others) I can straight up just ignore because these are always miles away from what I hear. Shows that a million people hear stuff in a million different ways. But I do get they do a lot of work around headphone measurements.
I've now owned these a couple of weeks.
The comfort is very good and the small quality of life features are great, i.e. earpads that work with glasses, the little bit of cable coil right before the plug into the cup which eliminates cable microphonics, the clicks and marking for the headband extension, allowing repeatable adjustments before putting on the headphones, and the large L/R indicators in the cups.
The design and build is Sennheiser at its best: simple shapes, simple mechanics, low number of constituent parts, low weight, and likely very durable.
Sound is very useable out of the box. Nothing that sounds off, though they are clearly not completely neutral for me. I've added some EQ based on measurements (I can't for the life of me work with sine sweeps) and spent several evenings listening to classical music on them without feeling the need to grab my normal go-tos for that (Dan Clark Audio E3, HD800 with EQ).
So all in all an extremely well-rounded headphone, well worth the asking price.
The comfort is very good and the small quality of life features are great, i.e. earpads that work with glasses, the little bit of cable coil right before the plug into the cup which eliminates cable microphonics, the clicks and marking for the headband extension, allowing repeatable adjustments before putting on the headphones, and the large L/R indicators in the cups.
The design and build is Sennheiser at its best: simple shapes, simple mechanics, low number of constituent parts, low weight, and likely very durable.
Sound is very useable out of the box. Nothing that sounds off, though they are clearly not completely neutral for me. I've added some EQ based on measurements (I can't for the life of me work with sine sweeps) and spent several evenings listening to classical music on them without feeling the need to grab my normal go-tos for that (Dan Clark Audio E3, HD800 with EQ).
So all in all an extremely well-rounded headphone, well worth the asking price.
Selkirks
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2022
- Messages
- 243
- Likes
- 583
The understated look of the design is very fitting for the daily driver/utility quality of the product. I have it in my moving around the house setup with a Fiio BTR17 for when I don't want to deal with big cans and wired amps.
Agree with this. I believe these have ended my search for a closed-back.
Don't feel too much of a need to eq.
Slightly less bass than the FiiO FT1 from 80Hz to 200Hz. I think that makes a difference for me. Don't really feel a need to tone down the bass region (I originally thought I would need to tone down).
More comfortable than the FiiO FT1 (but Fiio is decently comfortable).
No regrets in spending the cash. A winner.
I always wanted to replace my akg 371 with something that isn't held together with sellotape, has a decent response without EQ but doesn't break the bank. Been using the hd 480 for a few hours now and there are no niggles with it at all in terms of build, usability or sound. What a great headphone.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2019
- Messages
- 261
- Likes
- 452
I recently purchased these and was interested in seeing what other people are using for EQ as there isn't much posted eq wise yet for this model. Any chance you could post your adjustments? And if not too much trouble which measurement you used for your EQ?
On another note, I do like that sennheiser headphone seem a little more no-nonsense, well thought out devices vs. some other brands. A little detail I just noticed in looking at mine is these little dimples on the yoke of the left cup. Just another little detail that helps you quickly identify the orientation of the headphones when you grab it or glance at it, or if you grab it in a dark studio environment. (obviously it's also a single sided cable, so you can know which side is which, but a nice little detail nonetheless)
solderdude
Grand Contributor
3 dots in a row is the letter 'L' in Braille and found on many headphones.
First time I have seen it on a logical place though.
First time I have seen it on a logical place though.
I actually think it doesn't really need any EQ - it is a pretty great headphone - but obviously you might want to tweak things.
I used a measurement on squig.link and the EQ tools there. They don't really need EQ, but it's easy to play around and see whether anything works even better for yourself.
There's a more reliable B&K5128 measurement on Squig: https://earphonesarchive.squig.link/headphones/?share=5128_DF_Target,Sennheiser_HD480_Pro_(center) Looks like relatively easy to tweak (that 4 kHz dip is not nice though).
Resolve (headphones.com) gives 2 or 3 eq parameters in his youtube video - that he uses. Listener's measurements are up on squig link. I initially used Pragmatic Audio's measurements ( thanks!) to auto eq to the harman curve. Initially made the purchase because Pragmatic had measurements! Having enabled auto eq to harman and compared to no eq, I can say I'm more than satisfied with no eq. Above my knowledge but the extra bass doesn't seem to get in the way or detract - I cautiously say it might actually add to the sound signature in a good way.
Thanks for noting! This is very helpful for my massdrop 6XXs. I always forget where the R and L are on the 6XXs and can never clearly see them anyways. Just icing on the cake that the 480 pros have R and L in the cup itself.
I don't EQ headphones at all and find 480 Pro more on the brighter side (especially in the >8k) when compared with D1, which is supprising considering the graph. I liked D1 very much although I use headphones in the studio and moving my head around a lot, found them too microphonic. 480's are also microphonic as well, but it improves when plugging cable to the opposide (to the source) cup - not the most convinient solution but otherwise I would need send them back.
FTB
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2021
- Messages
- 407
- Likes
- 333
I bought them a few days ago in the hope to find better than the K371 at a decent price (I don't want to spend 4k $ on DCA Stealth...) and I was about to return them before I tried them with a proper amp due to their 130 Ω impedance.
At first I thought "not enough bass", not that I am a bass head but I like proper bass level like the AKG.
With the proper amp (in fact I use my Steinberg UR22 which headphone output is good enough, waiting for a Fosi DS2 with Sennheiser symetric cable), the bass level is good, tighter than the K371 and the obvious thing is the mids response :
the K371 sound "colder" due to the 4 kHz dip it has (that the Sennheiser don't) and less controled bass.
I prefer the measurements of UnheadLab as it usually follows what I hear :
Comfort and build quality are good too, I guess they will last longer than the AKG (my first K371 went off after 5 years, no right channel anymore).
Can't wait to see them measured by Amir for raw and unsmoothed measurements...
At first I thought "not enough bass", not that I am a bass head but I like proper bass level like the AKG.
With the proper amp (in fact I use my Steinberg UR22 which headphone output is good enough, waiting for a Fosi DS2 with Sennheiser symetric cable), the bass level is good, tighter than the K371 and the obvious thing is the mids response :
the K371 sound "colder" due to the 4 kHz dip it has (that the Sennheiser don't) and less controled bass.
I prefer the measurements of UnheadLab as it usually follows what I hear :
Comfort and build quality are good too, I guess they will last longer than the AKG (my first K371 went off after 5 years, no right channel anymore).
Can't wait to see them measured by Amir for raw and unsmoothed measurements...
