• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

SCIBER AMPLOI Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 35 12.8%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 76 27.7%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 126 46.0%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 37 13.5%

  • Total voters
    274

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
49,335
Likes
292,221
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the SCIBER AMPLOI stereo balanced amplifier. It was sent to me by the company and costs US $4,900.
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp review.jpg


The amp sets itself apart with somewhat unique styling that I like. The large footers allow for a set of RGB lights to show from the bottom that can dance to the tune of music. Lower feet are provided if you like less of an elevated setup (yes, the lights can be turned off). While volume control is provided, it and the preamp can be bypassed if desired:
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp xlr back panel bridge review.jpg

As you see, both XLR and RCA are provided as is trigger support.

The design is rather unique with use of switching power supply but class AB amplification using four LM3886 amplifier ICs per channel. The amplifier necessitates good sized heatsinks which anchor each side of the amplifier, giving it fair amount of heft although still lighter than one with linear power supply. In use, the top gets very warm and company nicely notes this as a "CON" of the amp!

The amp is designed and built in Russia and got lost in transit once so took a while to get here.

SCIBER AMPLOI Amplifier Measurements
I originally intended to only test the amplifier with the preamp/volume control in the loop. Here is that dashboard:
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR measurement.png

Towards the end of testing, I ran a quick test with the preamp bypassed removed and noticed better noise performance. So went back and re-ran some of the tests again with the by-pass enabled:
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR amplifier direct no preamp measurement.png


This gets us essentially the same performance as advertised by the company (THD+N of 0.0005%). This is very good performance as you see in our rankings:
Best russian amplifier stereo review.png


For RCA I only ran the test with pre-amp in the loop:

Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp RCA measurement.png


Back to XLR, here is the performance with or without the pre-amp engaged:
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR SNR preamp bypass measurement.png
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR SNR measurement.png


As noted, these are excellent results. Even with pre-amp engaged, crosstalk is reference quality:
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR channel separation measurement.png


Naturally, the frequency response shows no dependency on load impedance:
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR Frequency Response measurement.png


The dashboard revealed extremely low distortion which we see again in multitone and 19+20 kHz intermodulation tests:
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR Multitone measurement.png

Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR 19 20 kHz stereophile intermodulation distorti...png


Due to distortion being essentially constant, we get the excellent high frequency response above.

Power delivered matches the spec:
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR Power 4 ohm measurement.png


Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR Max and Peak Power 4 ohm measurement.png


Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR Power 8 ohm measurement.png


There is a slight power drop at 40 Hz:
Bass amplifier power stereo review.png


Best showing is in this distortion vs power vs frequency:
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR Power 4 ohm vs frequency measurement.png


Finally, the amp is stable on power up:
Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp warm up measurement.png

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/

Conclusions
It is clear the company aimed to squeeze the best out of the architecture they picked, leaving no stone unturned across all measurements. You can read about it in the company's white paper. Net results is objective performance approaching state of the art and well above average. Innovation is also provided in look and functionality with the RGB lightshow.

The cost is on the high side. I am not sure of economics of building such a product in Russia. So can't objectively say that it is too expensive.

I am going to recommend the SCIBER AMPLOI stereo amplifier.
 

Attachments

  • Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR Power 4 ohm vs frequency measurement.png
    Sciber stereo balanced AMPLOI amplifier amp XLR Power 4 ohm vs frequency measurement.png
    27 KB · Views: 1,148
Thanks @amirm

I think this is the first class AB with switching power supply that I have seen.
They did not choose more common design of keeping heatsink on the sides exposed outside for better cooling, probably to just make it look cleaner for expense of more heat building up inside causing top to get the heat.
the top plate seems to have vents from the pic, I might be wrong though.

Some pics from their website:

1755734870477.png


1755735071055.png
 
I know ASR doesn’t withhold recommendations based on value except in egregious cases but this is nigh approaching egregious. Good stats but not groundbreaking (B200 is ten times cleaner). And an amp’s most important job is providing power, and 64 watts is seriously unimpressive for this class.

Also…slava Ukraine!
 
For that price (5K) I would expect the amp to excel at something. This doesn't, so I'm not sure why someone would buy this product. It has no selling point.
 
I know ASR doesn’t withhold recommendations based on value except in egregious cases but this is nigh approaching egregious.
I went back and forth on this so appreciate both points of view. Ultimately, I decided to reward engineering that has optimized a design fully, incorporating and valuing engineering.
 
Left/right heatsinks appear to be housed inside the overall enclosure... even with top/bottom venting, it makes you me wonder about heat management.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3


JSmith
 
Back
Top Bottom