H-713
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2021
- Messages
- 379
- Likes
- 666
Yeah, this pot seems to be generally accepted as a nice unit, and one that generally works better than most. A lot of manufactures use them.
Alps specify a 3dB maximum gang error on this unit. Which is neither good nor bad I guess. It isn't as if there is anything peculiar about it.
I wonder, is there value is looking at the use of a linear pot with log faking resistor as an alternative? There is no intrinsic value in using a log/audio taper, it isn't as if the control even has any markings. Careful choice of values could yield both more stable gang matching and possibly a more useful range of knob positions.
Neve used to use log faking resistors in a lot of their equipment for this reason. Doesn't mean it's a perfect solution, but it does work and works quite well.
That said... if it's a reasonably decent 2-gang log pot, the tracking error isn't enough to be annoying unless you're at the bottom of the range. It's like having 0.01% THD. Yes, it looks mediocre in measurements, but in practice it is rarely objectionable.
For my designs, I tend to use BI conductive plastic pots. I want to say it's the P260 series that is a lot like the old Clarostat 388 series (the 1/2" blue things that were used in SSL, Sony and later Neve consoles), but they're rated for more rotation cycles and cost less than the 388 series. You can also buy them at Mouser, rather than having to do a custom order from State Electronics. For budget products, I see no reason to complain about the Alps RK09 pots. They were good enough for the Midas XL4.
I've played with a lot of different volume controls, and none of them are perfect. PGAs and Digipots need to have a lot of steps to avoid switching transients when content is playing, which is rather annoying. If they're controlled by a rotary encoder, then that adds another place where the whole thing can suck.
Pots aren't perfect, but from a user standpoint, they're pretty darn nice.