confucius_zero
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2018
- Messages
- 541
- Likes
- 345
So the SAGA is still the better pre-amp?
So the SAGA is still the better pre-amp?
@amirmAmir,
What is the input/output impedance in passive mode?
You should also test common-mode rejection in balanced mode, in this case in the 0dB mode. The passive VC would have no CMRR.
In passive mode the unit does not distort at 4V, so it cannot distort at lower voltages. Any distortion in the plot stems from the AP.With the majority of testing at 4v in and 4 volts out in passive mode, I am unsure if this helps greatly to reveal anything about distortion, at normal listening levels.
See the IMD vs Level graph. Best performance in active low gain mode is at 500 mV.Some measurements at a range of normal listening levels that purchasers would be using, might assist those contemplating purchase, and reveal the products, actual daily use characteristics.
With a performance like this those sound qualities depend only on room and speakers.Also is there any indication of how it sounded in your audio system in terms of reproducing music, was it able to reproduce as example, the depth evident in Jan Garbareks live recording "Dresden, particularly with Manu Katche's drums, and the harmonics of the other instruments being used ?
Even with the slightly worse channel (EDIT: spec is 0.002% at 2V so it's still in specs) I would recommend it, given the price. I may not have a good market overview but here it is difficult to find an excellent stereo preamplifier below € 1000 at all, so getting one for € 600 and with those feature set (XLR, stepped control, passive/active gain selection) is quite an achievement.Conclusions
If you can live with passive mode, you get superb, transparent performance with a very accurate volume control. Active low gain mode, if operated as good as the better channel would also be excellent. Alas, one channel is worse there to the tune of 9 dB. I wonder if Schiit has a specification for channel differential and would fix this under warranty. You should not need the high gain mode if you are fronting a DAC with proper output levels.
As it is, the Schiit Freya S is good but given the channel distortion issue, I can't fully recommend it. If that is resolved, then it is a very good preamp and one that I could recommend.
That is what the IMD versus level is for.Some measurements at a range of normal listening levels that purchasers would be using, might assist those contemplating purchase, and reveal the products, actual daily use characteristics.
In passive mode the unit does not distort at 4V, so it cannot distort at lower voltages. Any distortion in the plot stems from the AP.
That’s a relief, I can keep on using active mode with no issues. As far as I can tell, the only magic the tube section adds is some hiss and a headache dealing with a mishmash of faulty tubes Schiit sent me over two batches. But they sure look cool...It should be very difficult if not impossible to tell the difference in use.
Yours being tube based, likely has much worse performance and channel differential. There is no easy way to measure this. If you are in US, you are welcome to send it to me and I will measure.
Anything with digital I/O interfaces to computers or such? Or storage that could be transfered?
Difficult to understand what you want to say with this scramble of bad quoting (intermix of my posting and your answer). Mabe next time use the Preview button before hitting Post reply?As seen here: https://pinkfishmedia.net/forum/threads/alps-potentiometers-gain-and-distortion.68076/ distortion is best with some attenuators when there is no attenuation.
Set like this, with this style of passive they are just measuring wiring, and little else @amirm" Let's start with our usual dashboard, feeding the unit 4 volts and measuring 4 volts out in passive mode (volume set to max " ): In the process as I referred to, it reveals little about needed attenuation characteristics, as few purchasers would actually listen at full volume.
Music remains a great tell tale of product ability, and should always be part of every test.
But can I suggest something other than "design language" - design could mean engineering
or ergonomics
design language is often used to mean visual esthetics, and I think it denigrates real design, i.e. engineering - here circuits
It is the proper industry term (design language). Would you prefer for us to not say capacitor and instead say charge storage device?Aesthetics and ergonomics, definitely preferable. "design language" is a meaningless marketing term. It's not telling a story or talking to me.
In passive mode the unit does not distort at 4V, so it cannot distort at lower voltages.