• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

SB Acoustics SB20FRPC30-8 based desktop project

ppataki

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
1,220
Likes
1,360
Location
Budapest
Last year I did a project based on Markaudio CHR120 drivers in my home office

Then this year when I did my rear speaker project using the SB20FRPC30-8 drivers I really got astonished by these drivers so I have decided to replace my CHR120 desktop system with the SBs

I already have the SB drivers, they arrived yesterday:

20230503_101934.jpg


Since I have already sold my CHR120 drivers the plan is to re-use their now empty sealed cabinets:

1683184524717.png



X-max limited max input power will be 45W:

1683184569811.png


At 45W I will get 85.6dB at 1 meter at 24Hz (=91.6dB for stereo + I will have considerable room gain too)
Listening distance will be approx. 70cm

1683184599064.png


Group delay:

1683184719455.png



Impedance:

1683184772588.png



I will keep on posting pictures and later on some measurements and videos
I will use Dirac Live 3.x for corrections
 
OP
P

ppataki

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
1,220
Likes
1,360
Location
Budapest
I have made some progress, please see the pictures below:

20230505_104301.jpg


20230505_114922.jpg
20230505_133652.jpg
20230505_142439.jpg
20230505_145619.jpg


Unfortunately one of the drivers is faulty, it makes a buzzing sound at low frequencies. I have a replacement driver arriving this week so hopefully I will have time to redo that cabinet and do some measurements. ;)
 
Last edited:

Noricha

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2022
Messages
3
Likes
2
Hi, some information about standing waves will be useful to you

 
Last edited:
OP
P

ppataki

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
1,220
Likes
1,360
Location
Budapest
The paint-job is still to be done, here is where I am now:

20230518_105526.jpg


And the measurements:

Left channel, MLP measurement from approx. 75cm at 75dB

Corrected with Dirac Live 3.6 (highlighted) vs uncorrected
1684420310534.png


Distortion is room-driven due to the dips (I tried these drivers in my other room, distortion was really low there)

1684420526503.png


IR and SR

1684420568111.png


Waterfall:

1684420589898.png


Remember that the room is totally untreated!

Wavelet:

1684420625942.png


Typical to sealed sytems, there is close to zero delay in the low-end

Overall I am extremely satisfied with the sound subjectively speaking as well - typical full-range driver sound, totally holographic presentation, live sound!
Very strongly recommended!!
 

ernestcarl

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
3,106
Likes
2,313
Location
Canada
Some deja vu feeling going on here… I remember your sold Morel speakers of similar design.

Unfortunately, one can no longer listen side-by-side. However, do you subjectively and objectively (from previous measurements) find this pair substantially better?
 
OP
P

ppataki

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
1,220
Likes
1,360
Location
Budapest
Some deja vu feeling going on here… I remember your sold Morel speakers of similar design.

Unfortunately, one can no longer listen side-by-side. However, do you subjectively and objectively (from previous measurements) find this pair substantially better?
The Morels were by far the worst
The CHR120s were way better than the Morels and the SBs are so far the best
And price-wise we are going waaaay down ;)
Apparently price has really nothing to do with quality here...
 

shrub0

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2021
Messages
16
Likes
1
Looks good ppataki,
What morel drivers did you compare them to and what didn't you like about the morels?
 

jamescarter1982

Active Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2021
Messages
186
Likes
54
I'd just using these for Mt could the volume be reduced to very little ? would you think it would be realistic to wall mount some shallow versions of these if supported by a sub ? thanks
 
OP
P

ppataki

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
1,220
Likes
1,360
Location
Budapest
Looks good ppataki,
What morel drivers did you compare them to and what didn't you like about the morels?
Thanks @shrub0

It was the Morel TSCM634.
First reason:

1694783853429.png


The SB provides 5dB more output at 24Hz

Second reason is that the SB costs exactly 10 times less.... :)
 
OP
P

ppataki

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
1,220
Likes
1,360
Location
Budapest
I'd just using these for Mt could the volume be reduced to very little ? would you think it would be realistic to wall mount some shallow versions of these if supported by a sub ? thanks
What do you mean by Mt?

You can put them in a sealed cabinet of 6 liters but then you will need more amp power to drive them - namely 150W max to reach xmax (if you have a sub this might be less relevant actually)
Whereas if you put them in 17 liters 25W will be the max power you will need to drive them to xmax
 
Last edited:
OP
P

ppataki

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
1,220
Likes
1,360
Location
Budapest
Any off-axis measurements? Given the size it should be pretty easy to do. The on-axis looks dreamy, but as we all know things often fall apart at 30 degrees on out...
To be honest, no
I listen on-axis only and in one position only so I am focusing on optimizing the on-axis response only
I am sure the off-axis would look really bad, I can hear that when I move my head but that is totally normal for full range drivers of this size and I have no issues with that
The big advantage (for me it is an advantage) of this heavy beaming is that reflections are close to none (can be seen very clearly on the impulse response curve of full range drivers when measured in-room)
 

ernestcarl

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
3,106
Likes
2,313
Location
Canada
Any off-axis measurements? Given the size it should be pretty easy to do. The on-axis looks dreamy, but as we all know things often fall apart at 30 degrees on out...

SB Acoustics does have a few off-axis curves already in their spec sheet:

1694786060978.png



I would've loved to see 5-10 degree increments...

Like many "fullf-range" single drivers, if you flatten the HF direct on-axis too much, you will lose quite a bit of energy off-axis. For me personally, I would also try EQ'ing the driver (or make an extra DSP preset) so that it is not completely flat on-axis and listen to how that sounds as well -- if it's an acceptably better overall "compromise".
 
OP
P

ppataki

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
1,220
Likes
1,360
Location
Budapest
if you flatten the HF direct on-axis too much, you will lose quite a bit of energy off-axis.
True!
What I do is that I compensate that with a high-shelf. Sometimes only on the Side channel (M/S processing) - that elevates the highs only on the sides but not on the phantom center
But I guess this is up to personal taste too (subjective)
 
OP
P

ppataki

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
1,220
Likes
1,360
Location
Budapest
Given that the cabinets are attached to the wall I got some complaints from the neighbor so I am now replacing the wall-mounted cabinets with desktop standing ones:

20231008_203925.jpg


Will post some more pictures as I progress
 
Top Bottom