Doing great - hope you are too.@antcollinet
It's been a while since I last read your posts. I hope you're doing well, man.
Doing great - hope you are too.@antcollinet
It's been a while since I last read your posts. I hope you're doing well, man.
Doing great - hope you are too.
If I could point to a graph, I think the measurements related to the 45 Khz bandwidth. This show that this FDA stands out particularly from certain other Class D products with a minimal load dependence.
View attachment 488374
Thank you, @daniboun, you may have missed this....Thank you, @daniboun, this suggests that (amplifyer) noise is the real issue not THD,doesn't it, (stablely) decreaseing with power/W (increaseing/>SNR which decreases/reduces Noise Masking (difference/>=70db), allowing Contrast to improve/increase, doesn't it?) although >=15Khz/THD becomeing higher then falls a little, doesn't it? To ask and if you do not mind (further) clarifying, how would you suggest that this shows minimal load dependence, (possablely) its Linearity regardless of input frequency (20-45Khz) or power level?
What are thoughts of the Crosstalk?
I'll try to answer you with an analogy, by sharing three results. Let's take the best Class D amplifier tested by Amir, then the Topping B100 (the most exemplary), and finally our FDA. I gridded the graphs to make them easier to understand.Thank you, @daniboun, you may have missed this....
- To ask and if you do not mind (further) clarifying, how would you suggest that this (graph) shows minimal load dependence, (possablely) its Linearity regardless of input frequency (0/20-45Khz) or power level? If you could further clarify that would be fabulous, thank you :=)
- What are thoughts of the Crosstalk measurement?
The noise is the sum of the Axign chip, the STA516BE, the feedback from/with the Axign (ADC), and all other components in the signal path (coils, etc.). Leaving aside the components in front of the Axign chip and the power supply.Thank you, @daniboun, time to further ponder :=)
- Even though Linearity is very good, would you consider/suggest that Noise (perhaps the STA516BE/output) is the A30a's main issue?
If we now consider our FDA, its behavior is more linear, and quasi indepent of the frequencies.
We can see that the distortion is more pronounced at lower volumes, especially below 15 kHz
![]()
Thank you, @daniboun, a conundrum/dilemma with this graph. The A30a excels in the Bass region (<100/125hz), yet, the graph (-47db/1W, -55db/5W) does not suggest that it should, does it? Also, the amp is very quiet/silent, even when music is playing (between tracks, 92db Speakers/6.4R min)?Thank you, @daniboun, time to further ponder :=)
- Even though Linearity is very good, would you consider/suggest that Noise (perhaps the STA516BE/output) is the A30a's main issue?
Thank you, Yes, @Roland68, hopefully you and/or @daniboun are able to provide an explanation for my previous post (#1767), thank you :=)The noise is the sum of the Axign chip, the STA516BE, the feedback from/with the Axign (ADC), and all other components in the signal path (coils, etc.). Leaving aside the components in front of the Axign chip and the power supply.
Thank you, Yes, @voodooless, how relevant would you consider this Graph/Measure?The explanation is right there in the picture: “Rather high ultrasonic noise though. Wider bandwidth lowers SINAD”
This just means that the amps has significant amounts of ultrasonic noise.
Given this, we really don’t exactly know the distortion vs frequency behavior, because the noise drowns the distortion. One should then use a 22 or zo kHz filter and redo the measurement.
It's nice to see issues at higher power for certain frequencies.Thank you, Yes, @voodooless, how relevant would you consider this Graph/Measure?
It's nice to see issues at higher power for certain frequencies.
In the end, it's silly to point to one graph as the most important because they all can show different issues with varying impacts. But if I really had to pick a single one, it would probably be the 5W multitone. It shows distortion, noise, and IMD all in one go, and with the right load, also load (in)dependence.
Given this, we really don’t exactly know the distortion vs frequency behavior, because the noise drowns the distortion. One should then use a 22 or zo kHz filter and redo the measurement.
- The Ultrasonic noise suggests that capacitive Speakers/Cables are not compatable with Class D, wouldn't it?
It isn't. You are looking at a graph that shows the results of ultrasonic noise - you don't need to worry about ultrasonic noise - you can't hear it.Thank you, @daniboun, time to further ponder :=)
- Even though Linearity is very good, would you consider/suggest that Noise (perhaps the STA516BE/output) is the A30a's main issue?
The Ultrasonic noise suggests that capacitive Speakers/Cables are not compatable with Class D, wouldn't it?
Thank you, @daniboun, appreciated :=)Normally you shouldn't even worry about it with well done Class amps.
Class D amps are susceptible to high level of ultrasonic switching noise at very high frequencies (above 20 Khz). Ultrasonic sound is the part of the sound wave spectrum that ranges from 20 KHz to 10 MHz
Theoretically, humans are not affected...
View attachment 488722
Thank you, Yes, @antcollinet, the Multitone graphs confirm this, is that correct, although the 45Khz BW can be misleading, especially as you mention, the ultrasonic noise is not audable and no need to worry about it (not important). As @voodooless has mentioned, for the Power/W v THD+N/db graph (20-20Khz), a 22 or zo kHz filter should be utilised, sound reasonable :=)It isn't. You are looking at a graph that shows the results of ultrasonic noise - you don't need to worry about ultrasonic noise - you can't hear it.
1- what have any of those got to do with high levels of ultrasonic noise causing the problem.Thank you, @antcollinet, perhaps....
- the combination of the output filter inductance and a speaker/cable capacitance can cause this filter to behave unexpectedly by changing the filters resonant frequency and damping factor. Also a capacitive load can add to the existing feedback loop phase shift which if large enough can cause the amplifier to become unstable and oscillate. That is when the additional phase lag/shift is large enough, such as when the total phase shift around the loop reaches 180' while the loop gain is still greater than or equal to 1, the NFB turns into PFB, leading to instability and oscillation.
- although an optimized PFFB (and Spread-spectrum modulation, if utilised), despite the Filter components and/or Capacitive Load and/or EMI/SWF/Ultrasonics, can minimize these effects. Note, the above line is removed (to avoid confusion) :=)
- What are your thoughts? Would you suggest that they have all been sufficiently resolved? Although the A30a suggests not (quite) yet, doesn't it?
This a capacitive load not ultrasonic noise. As you have mentioned, both are very different. Although, my thoughts were focused on capacitive load and the way that ultrasonics might/would combine with a capacitive load. Apologys for any confusion, I did not take notice of the references that I was reading but I will try to (again) find them :=)what have any of those got to do with high levels of ultrasonic noise causing the problem.