• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

RSL ia255.1 Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 49 27.2%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 107 59.4%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 24 13.3%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    180

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
48,929
Likes
287,750
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of Rogersound Labs (RSL) ia255.1 stereo class D amplifier. It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $125.
RSL Rogersound Labs stereo amplifier subwoofer USB RCA input bluetooth review.jpg

The look is fine. The switches have very positive feedback. There are tone controls but alas, I wish there was a tone defeat. In my sample, center position was not the same as flat response, requiring very fine tuning. Back side shows one of the features many ask for:
RSL Rogersound Labs stereo amplifier subwoofer USB RCA input bluetooth external power supply r...jpg

The amp has a proper high pass filter for the mains. Its frequency is a bit high at 90 Hz. It is likely to be right for typical small desktop speakers. Speaker terminals are small as is typical of the class but I still managed. Forgot to take the picture of the external power supply which is roughly the size of the amplifier itself.

Unusually so in this class is inclusion of USB input.

RSL ia255.1 Amplifier Measurements
I adjusted the volume for 25 dB gain (see review picture for position) and drove the RCA inputs:
RSL Rogersound Labs stereo amplifier subwoofer USB RCA input Measurement.png

This is decent results and only slightly below average of all amplifiers tested. Was hoping USB digital would improve things but did the opposite:
RSL Rogersound Labs stereo amplifier subwoofer USB digital input Measurement.png


It severely increases noise causing SINAD to drop by some 15 dB which is huge. So I abandoned that and performed the rest of the tests using RCA.
RSL Rogersound Labs stereo amplifier subwoofer USB RCA input SNR Measurement.png

Noise performance is good for the class. There are amps that do better to be sure but this is not embarrassing.

Channel separation was actually very good:
RSL Rogersound Labs stereo amplifier subwoofer USB RCA input crosstalk Measurement.png


As I noted, I had to mess with tone controls to try to get a flat response. This is the best I could do:
RSL Rogersound Labs stereo amplifier subwoofer USB RCA input frequency response Measurement.png

I was impressed that the load dependency only occurs well outside of audible band. I tested the high pass filter and it has a 3 dB point of about 100 Hz -- close enough.

The "grass" in multi-tone is variable -- something I don't usually see:
RSL Rogersound Labs stereo amplifier subwoofer USB RCA input Multitone Measurement.png

Fortunately it is lowest where our hearing is most sensitive (2 to 5 kHz).

Power sweep shows modest power output and varying distortion levels:
RSL Rogersound Labs stereo amplifier subwoofer USB RCA input power 4 Measurement.png

RSL Rogersound Labs stereo amplifier subwoofer USB RCA input power 8 Measurement.png


Again, this is something I have not seen before. There is some kind of secondary distortion that sets in around 5 watts. You can see this much more clearly as we perform the same test but at different frequencies:
RSL Rogersound Labs stereo amplifier subwoofer USB RCA input power 4 vs frequency vs distortio...png


The rise in distortion with power level before clipping made it impossible to run my peak and max power ratings. The unit would only produce 1 or 2 watts before reaching 1% THD+N. You can see this in 40 Hz measurement:
most powerful amplifier review.png


Finally, the amp is sort of stable other than some kind of glitch early on:
Rogersound Labs RSL stereo subwoofer amplifier ia.255.png


Conclusions
Being also a speaker company, the ia255.1 provided the correct high/low pass filtering for mains and subwoofer channels. Dashboard performance is good for class as is the noise level. Distortion though, is somewhat unpredictable and rises quite high at higher frequencies. Competing amps also do that but not to this extent. So some refinements are needed for hopefully the next version. I was impressed with lack of load dependency -- something the company doesn't advertise and is an issue in budget class D amplifiers.

On strength of functionality and some of the measurements, I am going to Recommend the RSL ia255.1 stereo amplifier.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Appreciate any donations using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
Specs:
  • power: 55 Watts RMS/Channel <1%THD @ 4ohm
  • Type: Proprietary audiophile pre-amp stage, Class D output using MA12070 IC by Infineon
  • S/N Ratio: 106dB
  • Channel Separation: 106dB
  • THD+N: <0.006 % 1000 Hz ~10W
  • Internal High-pass Filter: 12dB/octave @ 90Hz, by passable via rear toggle switch
  • Efficiency: >92% efficient
  • Input Sensitivity: 185mV
  • Input Impedance: 40k ohm
  • Inputs: Stereo RCA (Line level), USB Audio (Type-C), Bluetooth 5.0 (APTx)
  • Speaker Outputs: Gold-plated fully-insulated Clear banana jacks (chassis mounted)
  • Pre-Outs: 3.5mm Stereo full-range signal output (standard line level)
  • Bluetooth: Up to ~30ft. wireless range with detachable compact antenna
  • Reset: Recessed button to forget and unpair BT device
  • USB Audio: 16 bit, 48khz*(pending device interoperability)
  • Power Consumption: 30W TYP. 168W MAX
  • Bass: +-9dB @ ~100 Hz Varying shelf compensation
  • Treble: +-9dB @ ~5000 Hz Varying shelf compensation
  • Chassis: 6061 Extruded Aluminum Housing and CNC machined panels
  • Product Dimensions: 5.48″ x 1.46″ x 5″
  • Packaging Dimensions: 13″ x 3″ x 8″
  • Product Weight: 0.87lbs
  • Shipping Weight: 2.2lbs
  • Warranty: 2 years
 
I voted fine given estimated use case of desktop speakers and sub. A pocket wonder for just $125 Aaaaand it has automatic high pass filter for subs. My amp (Audiophonics S400ET) cost about 10x as much.
 
Thanks @amirm I guess it's the cheapest class D with HPF we have seen? But I think the 3e audio A7 is probably worth the extra money.

But, I believe the new Aiyima A20 might be worth a review as I believe it is priced between these 2 amplifiers and has almost all the features we could like to see in a 2025 class D amplifier => Balanced Inputs, TPA3255 with PFFB, HPF, Trigger inputs.
 
Thanks @amirm I guess it's the cheapest class D with HPF we have seen? But I think the 3e audio A7 is probably worth the extra money.

The $100 Douk Audio A5 amplifier measured by Amir has a High Pass Filter.

EDIT

@amrim, the review picture shows the Bass/Treble controls adjusted slightly to the left of center. Are these the positions that measured as having the flattest frequency response ?

I voted 'Poor' based on the implementation of the tone controls sans a bypass option.
 
Last edited:
Very mixed bag.
- Would not have thought MA12070 to be capable of that kind of 1 kHz HD performance but the rising noise gain above 10 kHz is not pretty
- THD+N vs. power is probably among the worst ever, likely due to wideband noise. On the other hand, it is nice that 5 and 10 kHz are not that much above 1 kHz and lower
- Multitone IMD: why is grass < 1 kHz so much higher than at 1 - 7 kHz? How can it achieve the 1 kHz HD performance from the first panel if IMD at 1 kHz is still poorish.
- how did they screw up their DAC that much?
- second the comment about the HP filter, there are better options out there
 
For another $400 you get audio excellence with the Wiim Ultra Amp, which I bought 2 months ago. It boasts superior performance, better features (with a great App) plus 100W into 8 ohms vs only 20W. Yes, it is more money but if you are serious about your music save up as at US$525 it is the bargain of the decade.


Amir tested the Wiim Ultra (streaming preamp) here:

 
Is that MA12070 chip completely uncooled?
 
I have an 'open box' ia255.1 set to deliver later this week from RSL. I am happy to give this one a go- as I'm a fan of the way RSL does business. Stats are a little disappointing for this one, I suppose- but I'll be using it for a very small kitchen setup with an extra Wiim Pro+ and a pair of little Q Acoustics 3010c bookshelf speakers. I didn't purchase it for 'critical listening' purposes. I'm looking forward to checking it out in that application and paired with those speakers in a pretty small environment. I might consider adding in a baby sub down the road if it makes sense. Thanks for the review, Amir!
 
@amrim, the review picture shows the Bass/Treble controls adjusted slightly to the left of center. Are these the positions that measured as having the flattest frequency response ?
Assuming they did not move as I relocated it to take the picture, yes. I had to crank both to the left.
 
Is that MA12070 chip completely uncooled?
The case was completely cold so maybe it is not heatsinked. It is a pretty low power amp so it may be able to run that way.
 
I think if the DAC were better, it would merit OK, given its price and the high pass filter. As is, it's not terrible, but certainly someone could do much better. They need to fix the dac and the spike in distortions at higher but sub clipping levels to make this worthwhile, IMHO.

Thank you for the review, Amir.
 
Is that MA12070 chip completely uncooled?
Application notes on thermal guide is the key here;

The most important aspect to keep the amplifier cool is a good PCB layout and thermal heat flow. Follow the
guide in section 2 Recommended PCB layout. The designer can now choose the PCB stack-up and decide if a
heatsink is needed or not.


JSmith
 
I think if the DAC were better…
Zooming the above picture, it looks like one of these JieLi (JL) BT modules (AC6905A?) also used for USB input. The onboard DAC, while adequate for BT duties, may not the best around for USB input. A “free” convenience?
IMG_3007.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom