That will not necessarily get you absolute SPL accuracy; not all cal files include the sensitivity parameter (mine did not). But maybe they do now? I have not used it for a while.
Here's the two I got with mine?That will not necessarily get you absolute SPL accuracy; not all cal files include the sensitivity parameter (mine did not). But maybe they do now? I have not used it for a while.
MiniDSP guys worked with REW author to add level calibration to their USB mic. I tried but don't know how accurate it is.But maybe they do now?
Herb didn't include the sensitivity figure in his cal files as he didn't have a way to verify it, but these days he includes a version with the miniDSP sensitivity figure in an REW folder on the USB stick containing the cal data.Thanks guys. I checked my notebook and sure enough I have a cal file from miniDSP with the sensitivity parameter set. Oddly, the cal file from CSL (where I bought the mic) does not.
Side question: you are not by chance the JohnPM who is the author of REW, are you?Herb didn't include the sensitivity figure in his cal files as he didn't have a way to verify it, but these days he includes a version with the miniDSP sensitivity figure in an REW folder on the USB stick containing the cal data.
WOW, how great to have you here. Welcome!By chance I am
No, it is on TODO list. Just when I get to it... is not clear.@Amir,
Are you still working on Part 3, or have you just ditched the idea?
Kind regards,
J-J
Yes, REW can generate the filter settings for a number of boxes. Even when it can't, you can get the list and manually put them in there.Wow, it works!
Am I correct believing that this device (https://www.minidsp.com/products/minidsp-in-a-box/minidsp-2x4-hd) can load the filters generated by REW and correcting the response of my speakers and room?
In my experience though, the auto-generated ones don't always sound the best. They attempt to get maximum flatness which may not be what sounds best.
You are asking me to explain what part 3 will be.