Question.I own both the X2 and the dualcore, plus two antimode 8033s-II (subwoofer mono correction) and I’m very satisfied with all of them.
The X2’s correction is noticeably better than dualcore’s, and goes higher (about 2khz), instead of 500hz (max correction limit on dualcore). And it is more effective in correcting dips and hump. But most of all, it’s much better in setting the overall bass level after calibration. Plus it has a independent subwoofer output and is capable of 2.1 correction (2.0 on dualcore).
But I will keep the dualcore as well and use it for pure subwoofer/bass driver correction. I use two 8033 for stereo dipole bass correction in a 3-way OB speaker.
I feel Antimode got a undeservedly bad reputation bcause of the ASR dualcore SINAD test. Just testing SINAD on a swiss army knife of a device like the dualcore is very misleading and uniformative. Why just test for SINAD on a standalone device (no computer required) that for under 1k does/has:
-room correction
-dac/preamp with digital pass through (optical)
-is capable of simple room measurements without a computer
-PEQ
-variable bass/treble tilt
-subsonic filter
-low pass/high pass (6/12/24/48db LR)
does it eq 2 subs independent or as one?
If you can do eq seperste per sub, what mode do you use?
2.0 or 0.2?
I ask, as I have 2 subs and use 2 sub outs of pre amp that can time align both subs..
Want to make sure 1 of these x2 can do both subs and still allow me to time align.. Or do I need 2 of these.. One per sub..
Basically, I want stereo sub in, to stereo sub out.. With eq per sub independently..