RME Babyface Pro FS VS RME ADI-2 DAC FS difference in sound quality??

[bassfatcat]

Hello,

"Hello everyone, I would like to ask if there is no significant difference in sound quality between these two audio interfaces, RME Babyface Pro FS (AKM) and RME ADI-2 DAC FS." (AKM)

Thank you all.

 

[amirm]

English please.

 

[voodooless]

I bet the answer is “no”…

 

[bassfatcat]

請說英語。

English please.

Sorry, there was a language issue. Let me correct it."

 

[voodooless]

Still no…

 

[VintageFlanker]

Hello everyone, I would like to ask if there is no significant difference in sound quality between these two audio interfaces, RME Babyface Pro FS (AKM) and RME ADI-2 DAC FS." (AKM)

ADI-2 DAC FS is not an "Audio interface". It's a DAC.

If you need for powerful headphones output: ADI-2 DAC
If you do need analog inputs/ADC: Babyface.

DAC-wise, both will sound the same.

Period.

 

[unpluggged]

I would like to ask if there is no significant difference in sound quality between these two audio interfaces, RME Babyface Pro FS (AKM) and RME ADI-2 DAC FS

Do you intend to use the ADI-2 DAC's DSP features?

 

[Zensō]

My experience, having owned multiple copies of the Babyface Pro (FS and non-FS) and ADI-2 DAC FS, is that they sound identical when all DSP is turned off in the ADI-2. Of course, the ADI-2 offers many more features and allows for extensive DSP within the device. On the other hand, the Babyface is also an ADC and enables the use of TotalMix FX, RME’s mixing/routing software.

 

[bassfatcat]

ADI-2 DAC FS is not an "Audio interface". It's a DAC.

If you need for powerful headphones output: ADI-2 DAC
If you do need analog inputs/ADC: Babyface.

DAC-wise, both will sound the same.

Period.

Thank you.

I have an RME Babyface Pro FS (AKM) and I prioritize sound quality in my usage. I saw that RME has the ADI, and I was wondering if the sound quality would be better with it.

 

[bassfatcat]

Do you intend to use the ADI-2 DAC's DSP features?

No, I'm just curious if the sound quality would be better if I updated to the ADI.

 

[bassfatcat]

My experience, having owned multiple copies of the Babyface Pro (FS and non-FS) and ADI-2 DAC FS, is that they sound identical when all DSP is turned off in the ADI-2. Of course, the ADI-2 offers many more features and allows for extensive DSP within the device. On the other hand, the Babyface is also an ADC and enables the use of TotalMix FX, RME’s mixing/routing software.

So, if I understand correctly, the sound quality would be the same and there would be no need to upgrade to the ADI DAC.

 

[Zensō]

So, if I understand correctly, the sound quality would be the same and there would be no need to upgrade to the ADI DAC.

Correct. Only switch to the ADI if you need the hardware DSP.

 

[bassfatcat]

Correct. Only switch to the ADI if you need the hardware DSP.

Thank you, brother. I appreciate you helping me understand this. Grateful.

 

[Rmar]

What does the "Babyface" do. I have the ADI2 FS DAC and am very satisfied with it. The better the recordings, the better they will sound through the ADI2 DAC.

 

[Vincent Kars]

You can compare the DAC parts here:

RME Babyface Pro FS Portable Interface Review

This is a review and detailed measurements of the RME Babyface Pro FS Portable professional audio interface (ADC, DAC, headphone and digital I/O). It was kindly sent to me by the company. The Babyface Pro FS Costs US $899. It is an upgrade to the non-FS version of the same product. The...

www.audiosciencereview.com

RME ADI-2 FS Version 2 DAC and Headphone Amp Review

This is a review and detailed measurements of the updated version 2 of the RME ADI-2 FS DAC and headphone amplifier. It was kindly sent to me by the company. The cost us US $1,149. The ADI-2 looks very nice in black with a bright, super responsive display (doesn't come out as well in the...

www.audiosciencereview.com

The ADI is technically the better of the two but you might wonder if it is audible.

 

[bassfatcat]

What does the "Babyface" do. I have the ADI2 FS DAC and am very satisfied with it. The better the recordings, the better they will sound through the ADI2 DAC.

Babyface Pro FS is used for listening, not for recording.
I'm seeking advice from knowledgeable individuals to clarify the differences in sound quality compared to the ADI2 FS DAC.
Thank you for your input.

 

[bassfatcat]

You can compare the DAC parts here:

RME Babyface Pro FS Portable Interface Review

This is a review and detailed measurements of the RME Babyface Pro FS Portable professional audio interface (ADC, DAC, headphone and digital I/O). It was kindly sent to me by the company. The Babyface Pro FS Costs US $899. It is an upgrade to the non-FS version of the same product. The...

www.audiosciencereview.com

RME ADI-2 FS Version 2 DAC and Headphone Amp Review

This is a review and detailed measurements of the updated version 2 of the RME ADI-2 FS DAC and headphone amplifier. It was kindly sent to me by the company. The cost us US $1,149. The ADI-2 looks very nice in black with a bright, super responsive display (doesn't come out as well in the...

www.audiosciencereview.com

The ADI is technically the better of the two but you might wonder if it is audible.

After reviewing the tests, I understand the differences in dynamics and THD (Total Harmonic Distortion).
However, I am unable to comprehend the extent of the sound difference between the two.
Thank you, brother, for providing the reference. I am grateful.

 

[Zensō]

After reviewing the tests, I understand the differences in dynamics and THD (Total Harmonic Distortion).
However, I am unable to comprehend the extent of the sound difference between the two.
Thank you, brother, for providing the reference. I am grateful.

In my experience of owning both, there is no difference in sound; the difference is in features and functionality only.

 

[bassfatcat]

In my experience of owning both, there is no difference in sound; the difference is in features and functionality only.

After reading many articles and discussions, I have been pondering.
I wonder if it is related to the adjustments made to Xilinx FPGA.
Are they aligning the sound of all product lines?
Of course, this answer is uncertain.
It could be based on the experiences shared by fellow users who own physical devices.

Gratitude.

 

[BDWoody]

Are they aligning the sound of all product lines?
Of course, this answer is uncertain.

If by aligning, you mean looking to have a flat frequency response, low distortion and low noise...in other words pursuing high fidelity, then I'd have to assume the answer is yes. There is no evidence anyone is trying to make them sound different, just accurate. Measurements would reveal any kind of 'voicing.'