Paint.net free and excellentDo you have any kind of photo editing program that lets you set the jpeg compression size? If not, if you can put it on dropbox and such, I can load and resave them smaller.
Cool. What ad da chips is it using? I see an AKM in thereRequest granted.
Sure. Send me a PM and I will give the address.How about I send you the Schiit Fulla 2 that was the temporary stand-in?
Do you have any kind of photo editing program that lets you set the jpeg compression size? If not, if you can put it on dropbox and such, I can load and resave them smaller.
Very interested to see how this measures and how you subjectively find the sound. To me I think we are probably at the point where esoteric expensive domestic Hifi components are dead.
Intriguing Keith.Christof Faller is a clever guy, he has been working on a project for a well known French amplifier manufacturer of whom you are familiar!
Christof creates the EQ remotely from the measurements you make of your room, using the Illusonic software , we have sold it to customers who want to ‘actvate’ Their passive speakers or integrate subs or upmix two channel, the Smyth brothers uses Christof’s upmix tech for their ‘realiser’.
Keith
So far, I find the the ADI-2 Pro to be dead neutral, but not clinical or sterile. It's got enough juice to play quite loudly with any cans I own at any volume I'd want to listen to for any reasonable duration.
I've just scratched the surface of its capabilities. I haven't played with the loudness or PEQ yet, nor have I used it in a balanced headphone config, which gives more power output.
As for comparison to domestic hi fi, the combination of the ADI-2 Pro plus the Dynaudio active monitors makes for a very, very good nearfield experience, that is also highly configurable via EQ. Granted, it's not cheap -- the combination of the two, plus some Iso Acoustics stands and Belden/Neutrik XLR cables, is ~$3400, which is a lot more than most are willing to spend for desktop audio.
I'll probably add in the matching Dynaudio 18s sub, which would raise the price to $5400, but at that point I should end up with a reference calibre small scale home studio which will lose nothing in the near field / smaller room to the living room rig (and will probably better it in many ways).
I don't know of any domestic hi fi component that matches all of the RME's features -- at any price, actually.
I may well try that apart from the unsuitability of Devialet to deal with a 3-way easily. I'd probably just go for 2 more Job 225s if I was going to do that.You are more than welcome to borrow one, the software is step by step and straightforward , Christof creates the correction ,he will discuss and amend as you choose , you could even use it to activate your horns if you wished!
Keith
I recently purchased an Antelope Zen Tour. It has on board FPGA based effects, and emulations. So far most of the effects are your regular compressor, EQ, etc. etc. of various analog gear. And various old guitar amps. Some are going to be available to emulate many classic microphones. As new ones become available you download them. It also is remote controllable over a network from phone, tablet or computer. The latter being attractive to me for live on location recording. Is a good time for such gear. I think quality ADC and DAC plus analog circuitry that goes with it has been worked out to a very high level. So creative uses of DSP and interfacing is where innovations lie in the near future.
Here are links to some of the EQ and compressor emulations available just as an example.
http://en.antelopeaudio.com/hardware-based-fpga-effects/eq/
http://en.antelopeaudio.com/hardware-based-fpga-effects/compressors/
Nice. I really like the knob and the Thunderbolt port. I'm still somewhat torn on effects plugins that get implemented in the interface vs the DAW software. Quality-wise, I think the former are often better, but workflow-wise, I often prefer the later.
I agree with you regarding the level of maturity of ADDA circuitry and DSP will be the main innovation area.
What blows my mind is how many audiophiles don't accept this, or are even actively hostile to this. For analog purists I get the dogmatic rejection (although I think it's silly given how many LPs are made using digital editing), but for computer-based audiophiles I find it completely nonsensical.
Why are computer-based audiophiles engaged in the idiocy of using digital cables (USB, ethernet) as tone controls when they have DSP at their finger tips?