• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

RME ADI-2 FS Version 2 DAC and Headphone Amp Review

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,597
Likes
12,039
Looking at the plots, it seems to me that author failed to compensate for the fixed propagation delay (dead time) which is sample-rate- and filter-type-dependent, and which is why the phase curves bend upwards first before later going into the expected downward slope.
@KSTR to the rescue.. :)
 

MC_RME

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
May 15, 2019
Messages
871
Likes
3,613
In about 2 weeks I will redo these measurements with my APx and then discuss the result with Soundstage. I know that there is no such phase shift, as expected, but did not find my APx measurements on my travel computer. And discussing results from a different setup is wasted time...
 

nagster

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
367
Likes
598
Excuse me from the side.
I don't have ver.C(ess), but I measured ver.B(ak4493) to make the mystery smaller.

After a while, I noticed that the title of the Sound Stage graph was different. I usually use "Continuous Sweep" (chirp) for phase measurements, but they may have used "Transfer Function". I also attach the graph for that case.
rme_adi2dac_01_phase_chirp.png
rme_adi2dac_02_groupdelay.png
 

Attachments

  • rme_adi2dac_11_phase_TF_white_0dbfs.png
    rme_adi2dac_11_phase_TF_white_0dbfs.png
    141.3 KB · Views: 83
  • rme_adi2dac_12_phase_TF_white_-3dbfs.png
    rme_adi2dac_12_phase_TF_white_-3dbfs.png
    102.6 KB · Views: 76
  • rme_adi2dac_13_phase_TF_pink_0dbfs.png
    rme_adi2dac_13_phase_TF_pink_0dbfs.png
    97.1 KB · Views: 73
  • rme_adi2dac_14_phase_TF.png
    rme_adi2dac_14_phase_TF.png
    28.5 KB · Views: 82

MC_RME

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
May 15, 2019
Messages
871
Likes
3,613
Thanks. I am pretty sure that matches what I will measure with the ESS version. And good catch with the Transfer measurement - that seems to explain the strange results.
 

melowman

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2020
Messages
68
Likes
28
@MC_RME It would be great to measure the AKM version too, to compare with the above graphs, and because this is the model I and many users have. Thank you for your dedication.
 

melowman

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2020
Messages
68
Likes
28
What about this quote from the manual (ch. 31.3, p. 57), is it accurate?
Please also note that Slow and NOS filters cause much more aliasing into the audio band and out-of-band noise than Sharp filters.
 

danadam

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jan 20, 2017
Messages
978
Likes
1,521
What about this quote from the manual (ch. 31.3, p. 57), is it accurate?
I don't know if this is a valid test or what's the explanation, but I did two 44.1k loopback recordings (headphone out, low power) of a 20-20k sweep on ADI-2 Pro FS. AD filter was set to Sharp all the time and DA filter was first set to NOS and then to Sharp. Here are their spectrograms showing some difference:
r2.nos.png r2.sharp.png
And spectrum for 13 kHz:
fft.png
 
Last edited:

MC_RME

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
May 15, 2019
Messages
871
Likes
3,613
The effects shown here (thank you!) might be introduced from the ADC. It does not have a perfect, and correctly placed aliasing filter at the nyquist border (that's normal, unfortunately). I wanted to recheck this with the APx, but that will need some more time.

If so the statement in the manual is correct. The filters 'cause this', it does not say 'in the DAC'.
 
Last edited:

melowman

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2020
Messages
68
Likes
28
But this is the DAC thread, not the Pro thread; and indeed I was referring to the DAC’s manual…
 

bigidibo

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2022
Messages
7
Likes
1
Location
Lithuania
Quick question: Will RME ADI-2 work in XLR+RCA mode? Or is it just XLR or RCA? I would like to hook up the subwoofer on RCA outputs...

Thanks
 

DJBonoBobo

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Messages
1,379
Likes
2,881
Location
any germ

Matias

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,068
Likes
10,914
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
This is great news! A recurring criticism of the ADI-2 DAC is that the user interface is too hard to use, and this will be a killer solution. It's already looking very nice!
 

Atanasi

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
715
Likes
795
A while ago RME told no more firmware features are expected for the existing ADI-2 DAC due to a shortage of storage space. I wonder how they manage to squeeze this in.
 

Matias

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,068
Likes
10,914
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
A while ago RME told no more firmware features are expected for the existing ADI-2 DAC due to a shortage of storage space. I wonder how they manage to squeeze this in.
I think it is mostly transmitting and receiving back data than storing more stuff.
 

Trell

Major Contributor
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
2,752
Likes
3,285
A while ago RME told no more firmware features are expected for the existing ADI-2 DAC due to a shortage of storage space. I wonder how they manage to squeeze this in.

Indeed, and I expected at most some bugfixes going forward.
 
Top Bottom