• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

REW and Qudelix 5K

MKreroo

Active Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2020
Messages
159
Likes
79
Hi, I have recently done a measurement with Umik-1 and REW, and have generated an EQ. However when inputted into the 5K PEQ the overall curve seems flipped from the Filter graph in REW.
Should I be inversing the gain values or this is the intended result?
1764636088444.png

On another note, the response here is done with Psy smoothing, would 1/6 or Var be better suited for NF use? Response with those smoothing are much more spikey.

Thanks
 
Should I be inversing the gain values or this is the intended result?
No, that looks correct.

Just slightly confusing how REW displays filters.

On another note, the response here is done with Psy smoothing, would 1/6 or Var be better suited for NF use?
Best to use the Moving Microphone Method without any additional smoothing.

You get graphs like this:
Beolab 7.png

Very detailed, perfectly readable, and without the issues of single-point sweeps.
 
No, that looks correct.

Just slightly confusing how REW displays filters.


Best to use the Moving Microphone Method without any additional smoothing.

You get graphs like this:
View attachment 494564

Very detailed, perfectly readable, and without the issues of single-point sweeps.
Good to know it's REW that display the filters inverted.
This measurement was indeed taken with MMM, around 60 averages surrounding the MLP with 1/48 smoothing (smoothing was advised on another thread here)
1764671023308.png


I was under the impression that the un-smoothed graph would have lots of narrow peak/dips and thus not good for making EQ.
Without any additional smoothing, response >100hz can be EQ quite smoothly but <100hz remain very uneven (room mode?)
1764671161612.png

It seems the individual max boost needs to be higher, though currently at 6 I thought is already fairly high.

Thanks
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Without any additional smoothing, response >100hz can be EQ quite smoothly but <100hz remain very uneven (room mode?)
1764671161612.png

It seems the individual max boost needs to be higher, though currently at 6 I thought is already fairly high.
Max boost won't help much for room modes as physically, you cannot bring up bass nulls using EQ.

You can compare to the graph I posted above for a sensible PEQ approach to room correction.
 
Back
Top Bottom