• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Review of TRN Black Pearl: Portable USB DAC & Headphone Amp with 10-band PEQ

Rate this DAC & HP amp

  • Poor

    Votes: 3 2.6%
  • Not terrible

    Votes: 6 5.1%
  • Fine

    Votes: 35 29.9%
  • Great

    Votes: 73 62.4%

  • Total voters
    117
I recommend the Black Pearl over basically any other implementation of the CS chips, just like I'd recommend the EasyHCK Octave above any other implementation of the latest ES chips, TTGK mean business - Just get the latest firmware installed and use the 2nd filter (Fast-PC) to max out its performance.
 
I have both. Would probably choose Melody for the same price. Smaller with less weight, looks nice. Also supports asio driver while TRN BP do not. They both sound the same to my ears, with my headphones (HiFiMan Ananda, Sundara and Edition XS) they both stay cool or lukewarm to the touch, both powerful enough to drive them to unbearable levels. Both support peq, however their applications are buggy. Can't really go wrong with any of them.
 
I recommend the Black Pearl over basically any other implementation of the CS chips, just like I'd recommend the EasyHCK Octave above any other implementation of the latest ES chips, TTGK mean business - Just get the latest firmware installed and use the 2nd filter (Fast-PC) to max out its performance.
Not all TTGK-designed products are the same in the quality of support. TTGK is an ODM (original design/device manufacturer). Product support is largely determined by ordering brands/companies. In the case of TRN, I am not sure what is going on. TTGK stopped responding to my request to update its firmware. NiceHCK seems to actively provide updates. I guess TTGK is prioritizing their resources in meeting their customers' requests.
 
Last edited:
Are Melody getting hot/warm during use? And maybe it have an option to be "always on" so it didn't cut the audio during use with Windows?
Thank you!
I haven't seen any device with CS431xx (with no addition op-amps) run too warm to touch. As for the "always on" option, unless FiiO released a firmware update addressing it, I doubt there is such an option. But I am not sure as I don't have that device at hand.
 
Thanks everyone, I actually ordered TRN mostly cause of the high power specs when compared to melody. Has anyone tested its power output to confirm it's actually more powerful than melody?
 
Thanks everyone, I actually ordered TRN mostly cause of the high power specs when compared to melody. Has anyone tested its power output to confirm it's actually more powerful than melody?
They should be about the same. See this.
 
They should be about the same. See this.
Thanks!!! Hmm if that's true I'd have gone with the Melody for the size, design and the app compatibility also seems better. It's not a dealbreaker anyway but I'd be happier to hear that the TRN is indeed stronger.
 
From Fiio marketing I see that Melody has 2 volume buttons modes, but as far as i understand, you cannot get rid completely of the tracks control, that I hate. I'd just like to have both single tap and continuous volume at the same time, do you know if this is possible in some way? Since I'm still deciding if I really need a DRE free dongle, If this is not possible, Melody will go out of my shortlist.
I don't recall reading about track control for Black Pearl, so I'm assuming it is fine.
 
Not all TTGK-designed products are the same in the quality of support. TTGK is an ODM (original design/device manufacturer). Product support is largely determined by ordering brands/companies. In the case of TRN, I am not sure what is going on. TTGK stopped responding to my request to update its firmware. NiceHCK seems to actively provide updates. I guess TTGK is prioritizing their resources in meeting their customers' requests.

I understand, and I'm personally pursuing NiceHCK to try to get the firmware on par with other newer TTGK dongles like CrinEar Protocol Max (which has UAC 1.0 feature at launch), and they are at least responsive.
I haven't actively owned that many portable amps at all, but of the ones I own, the ones I can credibly say that sound like '0 gain' or 'true unity gain' are the ones with TTGK as the ODM. Nearly all others have apparent baked-in pre-gain or output buffers to 'improve' audibility.
This includes Fosi DS2 (unknown level of gain but enough output butter to sound very treble-boosted all the time and lacking in bass depth at any volume level), Fiio KA17 with Baked in +6db of gain in all modes, rendering it too loud at any volume (the sound signature is identical to Topping D50 iii/A50 iii combo which uses identical ESS chips at standard 4mm balanced out mode default at +6 db gain), and E1DA 3039S (latest one), which quizically uses maxed out volume on its op-amps, doubling the decibel output from Windows max level and utilizes some kind of custom Windows WASAPI volume output stage hack to attenuate this volume, resulting in always baked-in maximially loud but distant sounding music at any listenable level.
Exclusion is Topping who release amps with options including +0 DB gain for unbalanced but +6 gain minimum with balanced, but I enjoy TTGK's dongles which allow me to use my balanced headphone outputs at (what appears to be) true Unity Gain whcih is currently impossible with my Topping combo. So far my experience both Black Pearl and NiceHCK Octave credibly sound like unity gain, either louder or quieter in low or high gain mode, so I credit TTGK for that design.
I suspect something about the choice of DAC controller chips and their programming has something to do with my how this works.
 
I understand, and I'm personally pursuing NiceHCK to try to get the firmware on par with other newer TTGK dongles like CrinEar Protocol Max (which has UAC 1.0 feature at launch), and they are at least responsive.
I haven't actively owned that many portable amps at all, but of the ones I own, the ones I can credibly say that sound like '0 gain' or 'true unity gain' are the ones with TTGK as the ODM. Nearly all others have apparent baked-in pre-gain or output buffers to 'improve' audibility.
I really don't understand how you defined your own concept of 'true unity gain'. No DAC device seems to satisfy your requirement (no pre-gain or output buffer). All DAC products include output buffers either in a DAC chip itself (e.g., CS43131) or in an output stage. Otherwise they cannot drive connected devices or headphones.

E1DA 3039S (latest one), which quizically uses maxed out volume on its op-amps, doubling the decibel output from Windows max level and utilizes some kind of custom Windows WASAPI volume output stage hack to attenuate this volume, resulting in always baked-in maximially loud but distant sounding music at any listenable level.
Where did you get this information? There is no way to achieve the E1DA 9039S' measured SINAD with digital volume attenuation involved. It is not possible.

If you truly hear that clear level of differences caused by output gain/buffers, you should be able to measure those effects in a certain condition (e.g., using certain test signals, levels and device settings). A standard package of tests simply cannot cover all possible scenarios. As long as you have plausible conjectures/hypotheses, you can come up with suitable tests. Audible differences often translate to HUGE differences in measurements.

EDIT. There's no such thing as true unity gain output from DAC. For example, ES9039Q2M's max output is only 1.03 Vrms (or 2.92 Vpp) at 0 dBFS (with ESS's recommended voltage supply). This means that any proper design of a DAC device employing this chip should add an output stage with positive gain. So, the output you get from Topping D50 III or NiceHCK Octave is a result of positive gain applied to the DAC chip's output.
 
Last edited:
You're right, and Its difficult to judge a person's intention from text alone. Everything stated in my above post is purely the opinions and intuitions of an enjoyer of music. I have no data nor am I about to provide msasurement or data to support my opinions and they are entirely subjective and based on comparisons and impressions only. I purchased all the aforementioned items with my own money, without a hint of favor or expectations beforehand, if that means anything. I do have decades of training as a classical musician if that has any weight, and way too much time listening to audio.

The comparisons - and no I did not do a scientific study - were derived from using Topping D50iii and A50iii as a basis for comparison to each one, then comparing each to other based on my impressions of how they sound relative to those. Since Topping publishes all the gain, Vrms, and other technical information on their website, that was the basis of my numbers. I simply found that the products I called 'credibly sounding like unity gain' sound extremely similar to the 0db Gain 'Medium gain' mode on A50 iii, with D50 iii running at 5V, DACmode with no volume attenuation (theoretically unity gain). I did use both around 60 Ohm and 300 Ohm headphones to try everything. Anybody else is free to do the comparisons of the items above and offer their recommendations of what they believe is high fidelity or not, derived from them.

In my view 'high fidelity' just means 'does this sound right' and is it approximately at 0 Db gain, since adding gain basically alters the original intention of the audio.
I basically zone onto extremely small segments of various tracks and compare which details are audible and how much at a given time, at various settings per device. I think Topping comes out as a good standard since it is very flexible with its various modes and input options.

I do not understand what E1DA team has done with the volume logic on their device, but its safe to say the sound signature is extremely treblous and also quite powerful compared to a typical 0 Db gain signal. This points to using the op-amps at a maximal output level, then somehow attentuating the volume. This is actually how Topping desktop amplifiers work, since the volume knob on them is actually an attenuation knob, with a low impedance headphone (50-60 Ohm) being extremely loud even at 1/5 of the volume on 0 db gain, due to the high total available power bank. It's also rather difficult to hear treble details with a Topping desktop amplifier unless you raise the volume knob to about 1/3, at which point you'll likely go deaf anyway. This behavior of desktop amps might've been what E1DA was emulating to begin with, but he does capture the full amplitude of sound with full volume attentuation being possible at scale, which I commend - as this is impossible on a Topping amp as treble data disappears below a certain threshold.

You've probably encountered the rather unique tweak program provided with E1DA it since you've been testing it, where attempting to press the volume + or - key on windows will swap the volume logic away from the Tweak app back to Windows, and blow you ears off, or vice versa. I don't think that has anything at all to do with noise performance as the op-amps are likely designed to work linearly under any load. Nor do I review the item poorly, performane wise, but I do find it quizzical in the volume handling department.

EDIT: I understand that there is no such thing as 'true unity gain' output, as its a contradiction in terms to have an amplifier that doesn't apply gain. But in terms of sound signature, gain staging that alters the sound signature of the output is for me, undesirable. I think you have high fidelity, digitally speaking, from any of these devices, but what I'm aiming for is accurate sound reproduction. How exactly that can be achieved comes down to the specific op-amp design, and device's architectural employment of them. We know the CS 14314 has built-in amplification, which in theory should simplify things for devices employing them - but as we can see in practice there is quite a bit of variation in the character of sound from devices employing those chips, so the particular amplifiers being used is only part of the story in any case.
 
Last edited:
Just authorize the app when you connect your DAC, click updata, then check for firmware then update. I had to turn on 1.1.1.1 to update tho, idk why but when i update normally through my network it just stuck at 30-99%
Firmware updating seems to have gotten more complicated with their latest Android app... installing the app generates a Google Play warning about what data it will have access to, and then accessing "Firmware Upgrade" in the app results in needing to register and create a login with Walk Play first.
 
I know that holding + and - switches UAC mode but how do I know what mode it is in?
One mode should give a bandwidth of up to 96khz (USB 1.1) and the other mode should show a bandwidth up to 384khz. If there is no designation, I guess that would be the only way to know.
 
One mode should give a bandwidth of up to 96khz (USB 1.1) and the other mode should show a bandwidth up to 384khz. If there is no designation, I guess that would be the only way to know.
Actually, some utility programs/app can tell you what the host sees.
 
hello everyone! i have been living under a rock for the past few years. can i safely buy the latest stocks of the TRN BLACK PEARL and have a pleasant experience without worrying about these "distortion issues" and firmware updates? FWIW will this be audible to my geriatric ears? I plan to use them with easy to drive IEMs and headphones only. cheers!
 
FWIW will this be audible to my geriatric ears
Yes. It's not distortion as most people understand but a continuous clicking when listening to quieter, bassier content. The age of the listener has little to do with it
 
Yes. It's not distortion as most people understand but a continuous clicking when listening to quieter, bassier content. The age of the listener has little to do with it
Agreed, yet it remained unnoticed by most for... years.
 
Agreed, yet it remained unnoticed by most for... years.
Yup! It's interesting isn't it? It appears under dynamic music conditions which are not normally replicated by frequency sweeps, noise and (harmonic, IM) distortion measurements. It reminds me a little of diesel cars which had good figures when running standard tests, but big issues when driven normally.
 
Back
Top Bottom