It means nothing to anyone. Prove it by demonstrating measurements, since you are on a forum with a scientific background.
God bless "Ignore" feature.
It means nothing to anyone. Prove it by demonstrating measurements, since you are on a forum with a scientific background.
With a certain desire and labor expenditures, personal opinions about sound using well-known methods are easily converted into objective scientific results. Arrogance and boasting are not transformed into science in any way.God bless "Ignore" feature.
... hence, AVCC rail is badly regulated. A technically that's bad, regarding "bass is low, powerful, but transparent" who knows.
zenon, sorry, I did see only this one pic https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?attachments/avcc-l_r-mod-png.23262/ And my comment only about that.
Anyone sees there something serious, worth for revers-engineering, really? zenon, if you looking for some comment, why you show only part of the idea, how we can guess about missed parts?
... but, You are not busy to post hereooh, no, I'm too busy to read such diy ideas, the same as reverse-engineering of chinese creations
Without objectively testing both devices under the same conditions, nobody can provide an objective answer.Can you please suggest is it worth switching to Topping D10 (Sabre ES9018K2M) from E-MU 0204 interface (AK4396 chip) in terms of overall output quality apart from DSD support?
NTomokawaWithout objectively testing both devices under the same conditions, nobody can provide an objective answer.
That being said, I personally tend to believe that a dedicated, standalone unit would tend to do a better job than a similar device jam-packed with all sorts of features.
Especially if they cost about the same (N.B. the EMU 0204 has been discontinued at the time of writing and I have no way of knowing its original MSRP).
Just my $2 CAD (adjusted for inflation and devaluation).
Take a look at this...NTomokawa
Thanks for your contribution! ,)
That's the ting: I paid ~ $190 USD for E-MU 0204 back in 2011. So it is roughly twice the cost (not sure abt inflation and devaluation though)
Maybe someone already made that switch (E-MU > Topping) and may suggest smth, because the device is long known and widely used.
Already tried these values in Foobar2000.I would try a buffer of 500, 1000 or even 2000 ms. But perhaps you already tried those values.
In the ASIO panel and in Foobar.
It's a 5-year-old laptop with Intel Core i5 3210M CPU and 8GB RAM.How powerful is your machine?
When playing music in Foobar2000, I keep getting an occasional sound cut out (lasting about half a second at a time) with my D10, mainly when I do something else on my computer like browsing the internet.