invaderzim
Senior Member
This thing measures well, outperforming most 2-channel alternatives costing more than a quarter of the price (ie more per channel). I’m surprised by the negativity, as I find it very hard to imagine any of this unit’s failings could be audible.
Sometimes the quest for equipment that is 'better' where the improvement can't be heard reminds me of the quest for untestable but 'better' performance.
On the one hand if it is impossible to hear the improvement is there an improvement? And on the other if tests don't show an improvement is there an improvement?
Last edited: