• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Review and Measurements of Sony HAP-S1 Streamer/Server

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,368
Likes
234,394
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Sony HAP-S1 digital player, server, streamer and integrated amplifier. It is on kind loan from a member and costs USAD $998 on Amazon including Prime shipping.

I must say, having worked for Sony years back (1990s), I still have a soft spot for the company at some level. So keep this in mind as you read the review.

From the outside, the HAP-S1 looks pretty nice:

Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 Review.jpg

There a lot of features here from internal storage of music on 500 Gigabyte hard disk (as shown) to network streaming. I am not going to review any of that. I suggest reading the write-up on Archimago's site for that (and painful limitations within): http://archimago.blogspot.com/2018/05/review-sony-hap-s1-by-allan-folz.html

While the LCD is nice and larger, don't expect mobile phone class performance and smoothness when it comes to scrolling and such. Mind you, it is not horrible but it is the typical slow microprocessor struggling to move pixels smoothly.

I had no issues navigating the menus using the rotary control which has a switch to select options.

The volume control though, is horrid. It is so stiff and you may need to go and get a large pair of pliers from hardware storey to turn it! As if they thought by making it stiff it will feel luxurious which it does not in any form or fashion. The control is digital and has pretty large steps. And oh, when you first turn on the unit, the volume control works for for good few seconds, you get no indication on the screen as to its value! Seems to be a software app that takes a while to start after the unit powers on.

Connectivity in minimal:

Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1Back Panel.jpg

The "line out" is actually not line out. It is DAC out. Nothing from analog inputs gets routed there.

Very strangely, there is no USB input! There is USB host interface for a thumbdrive and such but no way to use this as a USB DAC.

Let's get into measurements and see if she lives up to Sony brand of yesterday or not.

DAC Measurements
For DAC measurements, I fed the HAP-S1 using S/PDIF and measured the output using the D/A output. Its level is fixed and slightly above 2 volt we like to see:

Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 Measurements.png


Yuck. 84 dB SINAD (Signal over noise and distortion)??? Sony goes out of its way to advertise this as a high-resolution player and it can't even do justice to 16 bit CD (dynamic range of 96 dB)?

No, it is not any kind of digital clipping. Lowering the level -1 dBFS only improved SINAD slightly. Distortion is dominated by the second harmonic.

Needless to say, this type of performance puts the HAP-S1 in the tier 4 (lowest) of all DACs tested:
Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 SINAD Measurements.png


Jitter performance could be better but not an audible concern:

Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 jitter Measurements.png


The spikes on the left are power supply noise which you can also see in the FFT in the dashboard. I tried to lower then by playing with grounding but only got this far.

Linearity is not bad but definitely fails us as far as high res content is concerned:

Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 Linearity Measurements.png


We have $99 DACs that are nearly ruler flat here to -120 dB (20 bit performance).

THD performance usually predicts Intermoduation distortion and this is no exception:
Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 IMD Measurements.png


We have elevated noise and distortion that dominates at around -13 dBFS.

Multitone test dramatically shows the problem with high harmonic distortion we saw in dashboard:

Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 Multitone Measurements.png


I think this is the worst performance I have seen since I started to run this test. Higher frequencies in real music are at much lower levels and likely will get swamped by the spray of harmonic distortion from lower tones. High-res promise forgotten for sure.

Headphone Measurements
Let's take some bets before I show the headphone measurements. Who thinks they are going to be good or bad? Let's find out.

Here is what we get with 300 ohm load:

Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 Headphone 300 Ohm Power Measurements.png


Wow. That is incredibly high noise level. There is good amount of power though which "smells" to me that they output is coming from the power amp and hence the much higher noise level.

Let's see what happens when we reduce the load to 33 ohm:

Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 Headphone 33 Ohm Power Measurements.png


Crap is what happens. We lose a ton of power. Usually we get more power when we go down in load impedance. Not here. We are left with incredibly low 45 milliwatts of power. I suspect your phone puts out more power than this desktop product. What is wrong? This is what is wrong:
Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 Headphone Output Impedance Power Measurements.png


Yup. We have 400 Ohm output impedance! So our suspicion is correct. They did not design a dedicated headphone amp. Instead, they put a 400 ohm resistor on the output of the power amplifier and called it done. Never mind that we now have huge losses and impedance that will likely change the tonality of most headphones you throw at it.

You could have predicted this book by its cover (DAC measurements), could you not?

Can the power amplifier save the HAP-S1? Let's find out.

Power Amplifier Measurements
Let's start with our usual 5 watt dashboard. I used the S/PDIF digital input:

Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 Power Amplifier Dashboard Measurements.png


0.03% distortion? Why would anyone care about high-bit-depth content on an amplifier that can't remotely resolve 16 bit content? We are 50 dB short of resolving 20 bits!

Even if the harmonic distortion was not there, all of those mains harmonics would have gotten us.

Frequency response is flat enough for CD playback but for high-res we have some peaking which an be forgotten:
Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 Power Amp Frequency Response Measurements.png


Sony does not spec the power level at 4 ohm. This is what I got:

Sony High-Resolution Audio HDD player HAP-S1 Power Amp 4 Ohm Measurements.png


Not bad as far as power goes for a desktop amp but as expected, noise level is pretty high. Best case performance is 0.01% THD+N (really +N). Should be good enough for small desktop/bookshelf speakers.

I think we need to stop punishing ourselves and stop here.

Conclusions
To say the Sony HAP-S1 has disappointing performance is an understatement. There is not one subsystem that is designed for excellence. You can tell no one cared for was proud of the audio performance since the "specifications" on Sony site has essentially no data. The engineers that designed the good Sony gear back in 70s, and 80s must be long retired by now. Morita-san (co-founder of Sony), may he rest in peace, would have a heart attack over what this HAP-S1 produces.

The engineers are not the only ones at fault. The marketing department is to blame too for demanding a list of modern features, forgetting what it means to build an audio product with Sony name on it. Clearly they are out of touch not realizing the importance of good headphone amplifier design for example.

The amount we have regressed in audio performance over the years is astonishing. Companies have forgotten where they have come from and what their brands stood for. It is not like they can compete with software giants like Apple. The least they can do is build great performing hardware. The guard is asleep, leaving it to "chinese" companies to build state of the art desktop audio products. Imagine the shame in that. I hope there is a serious wake up call at Sony.

Now please excuse me as I go and edit out Sony out of my resume. :(

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Have craving for some good Dim Sum. Nearest place is 35 miles away so I need gas money for that. Please consider donating money using:
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audiosciencereview), or
upgrading your membership here though Paypal (https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...eview-and-measurements.2164/page-3#post-59054).
 

Purité Audio

Master Contributor
Industry Insider
Barrowmaster
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Messages
9,051
Likes
12,150
Location
London
Riveting as always, I would have thought that Sony could have designed a decent product in their sleep, how can a company allow itself to become so diminished?
Keith
 

graz_lag

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 13, 2018
Messages
1,296
Likes
1,583
Location
Le Mans, France
@amirm
In general there is no distinction between masculine, feminine in English nouns ...
You use the feminine gender (she), perhaps 'cause you refer to it (her) as a "machine" ?
 
Last edited:

svart-hvitt

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 31, 2017
Messages
2,375
Likes
1,253
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Sony HAP-S1 digital player, server, streamer and integrated amplifier. It is on kind loan from a member and costs USAD $998 on Amazon including Prime shipping.

I must say, having worked for Sony years back (1990s), I still have a soft spot for the company at some level. So keep this in mind as you read the review.

From the outside, the HAP-S1 looks pretty nice:


There a lot of features here from internal storage of music on 500 Gigabyte hard disk (as shown) to network streaming. I am not going to review any of that. I suggest reading the write-up on Archimago's site for that (and painful limitations within): http://archimago.blogspot.com/2018/05/review-sony-hap-s1-by-allan-folz.html

While the LCD is nice and larger, don't expect mobile phone class performance and smoothness when it comes to scrolling and such. Mind you, it is not horrible but it is the typical slow microprocessor struggling to move pixels smoothly.

I had no issues navigating the menus using the rotary control which has a switch to select options.

The volume control though, is horrid. It is so stiff and you may need to go and get a large pair of pliers from hardware storey to turn it! As if they thought by making it stiff it will feel luxurious which it does not in any form or fashion. The control is digital and has pretty large steps. And oh, when you first turn on the unit, the volume control works for for good few seconds, you get no indication on the screen as to its value! Seems to be a software app that takes a while to start after the unit powers on.

Connectivity in minimal:


The "line out" is actually not line out. It is DAC out. Nothing from analog inputs gets routed there.

Very strangely, there is no USB input! There is USB host interface for a thumbdrive and such but no way to use this as a USB DAC.

Let's get into measurements and see if she lives up to Sony brand of yesterday or not.

DAC Measurements
For DAC measurements, I fed the HAP-S1 using S/PDIF and measured the output using the D/A output. Its level is fixed and slightly above 2 volt we like to see:

View attachment 22639

Yuck. 84 dB SINAD (Signal over noise and distortion)??? Sony goes out of its way to advertise this as a high-resolution player and it can't even do justice to 16 bit CD (dynamic range of 96 dB)?

No, it is not any kind of digital clipping. Lowering the level -1 dBFS only improved SINAD slightly. Distortion is dominated by the second harmonic.

Needless to say, this type of performance puts the HAP-S1 in the tier 4 (lowest) of all DACs tested:
View attachment 22640

Jitter performance could be better but not an audible concern:

View attachment 22641

The spikes on the left are power supply noise which you can also see in the FFT in the dashboard. I tried to lower then by playing with grounding but only got this far.

Linearity is not bad but definitely fails us as far as high res content is concerned:

View attachment 22642

We have $99 DACs that are nearly ruler flat here to -120 dB (20 bit performance).

THD performance usually predicts Intermoduation distortion and this is no exception:
View attachment 22643

We have elevated noise and distortion that dominates at around -13 dBFS.

Multitone test dramatically shows the problem with high harmonic distortion we saw in dashboard:

View attachment 22644

I think this is the worst performance I have seen since I started to run this test. Higher frequencies in real music are at much lower levels and likely will get swamped by the spray of harmonic distortion from lower tones. High-res promise forgotten for sure.

Headphone Measurements
Let's take some bets before I show the headphone measurements. Who thinks they are going to be good or bad? Let's find out.

Here is what we get with 300 ohm load:

View attachment 22645

Wow. That is incredibly high noise level. There is good amount of power though which "smells" to me that they output is coming from the power amp and hence the much higher noise level.

Let's see what happens when we reduce the load to 33 ohm:

View attachment 22646

Crap is what happens. We lose a ton of power. Usually we get more power when we go down in load impedance. Not here. We are left with incredibly low 45 milliwatts of power. I suspect your phone puts out more power than this desktop product. What is wrong? This is what is wrong:
View attachment 22647

Yup. We have 400 Ohm output impedance! So our suspicion is correct. They did not design a dedicated headphone amp. Instead, they put a 400 ohm resistor on the output of the power amplifier and called it done. Never mind that we now have huge losses and impedance that will likely change the tonality of most headphones you throw at it.

You could have predicted this book by its cover (DAC measurements), could you not?

Can the power amplifier save the HAP-S1? Let's find out.

Power Amplifier Measurements
Let's start with our usual 5 watt dashboard. I used the S/PDIF digital input:

View attachment 22648

0.03% distortion? Why would anyone care about high-bit-depth content on an amplifier that can't remotely resolve 16 bit content? We are 50 dB short of resolving 20 bits!

Even if the harmonic distortion was not there, all of those mains harmonics would have gotten us.

Frequency response is flat enough for CD playback but for high-res we have some peaking which an be forgotten:
View attachment 22649

Sony does not spec the power level at 4 ohm. This is what I got:

View attachment 22650

Not bad as far as power goes for a desktop amp but as expected, noise level is pretty high. Best case performance is 0.01% THD+N (really +N). Should be good enough for small desktop/bookshelf speakers.

I think we need to stop punishing ourselves and stop here.

Conclusions
To say the Sony HAP-S1 has disappointing performance is an understatement. There is not one subsystem that is designed for excellence. You can tell no one cared for was proud of the audio performance since the "specifications" on Sony site has essentially no data. The engineers that designed the good Sony gear back in 70s, and 80s must be long retired by now. Morita-san (co-founder of Sony), may he rest in peace, would have a heart attack over what this HAP-S1 produces.

The engineers are not the only ones at fault. The marketing department is to blame too for demanding a list of modern features, forgetting what it means to build an audio product with Sony name on it. Clearly they are out of touch not realizing the importance of good headphone amplifier design for example.

The amount we have regressed in audio performance over the years is astonishing. Companies have forgotten where they have come from and what their brands stood for. It is not like they can compete with software giants like Apple. The least they can do is build great performing hardware. The guard is asleep, leaving it to "chinese" companies to build state of the art desktop audio products. Imagine the shame in that. I hope there is a serious wake up call at Sony.

Now please excuse me as I go and edit out Sony out of my resume. :(

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Have craving for some good Dim Sum. Nearest place is 35 miles away so I need gas money for that. Please consider donating money using:
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audiosciencereview), or
upgrading your membership here though Paypal (https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...eview-and-measurements.2164/page-3#post-59054).

Thanks for nice review! Very disappointing Sony box.
 

maty

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
4,596
Likes
3,160
Location
Tarragona (Spain)
Last edited:

JJB70

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 17, 2018
Messages
2,905
Likes
6,148
Location
Singapore
Very sad, Sony have an unsurpassed heritage in audio and it is difficult to overstate their contribution to digital and portable audio. Their ES line was legendary. Sad to see their name on this, it doesn't even have the excuse of being cheap and cheerful.
 

JJB70

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 17, 2018
Messages
2,905
Likes
6,148
Location
Singapore
I think that the virtual withdrawal from high quality audi by Sony speaks volumes about how the market has changed. And those higher end components they still make seem mainly to be in the fashionable field of mobile units and headphones (although they still have a significant presence in high quality home theater). Audio equipment has been commoditised and the market has decided that BT speakers and sound bars are sufficient (and Sony make some nice sound bars).
 

Krusty09

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Messages
257
Likes
165
I agree . When the ipod first came I use to think to myself man this thing is good enough . With that being said that really was the beginning of the end for almost all of hi end as we knew it. I'm guilty of it myself as I am listening to my Yamaha music cast speaker as I write this. I think as years go on and crapy streaming gets better and better I think hi end is dead if it's not already.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,368
Likes
234,394
Location
Seattle Area
@amirm
In general there is no distinction between masculine, feminine in English nouns ...
You use the feminine gender (she), perhaps 'cause you refer to it (her) as a "machine" ?
It is a term of endearment for machines. Good example is Scotty's references to space ships:


Typical uses are for cars, boats, etc.
 

JJB70

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 17, 2018
Messages
2,905
Likes
6,148
Location
Singapore
You have to be careful these days, I work in shipping and certain people now interpret referring to ships as "she" and "her" as offensive. One of my former employers spent quite a bit of money to ensure that all their material was gender neutral after receiving accusations of institutionalised sexism. And most seafarers (of both sexes) still use feminine pronouns when taking about ships.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,524
Likes
37,057
You have to be careful these days, I work in shipping and certain people now interpret referring to ships as "she" and "her" as offensive. One of my former employers spent quite a bit of money to ensure that all their material was gender neutral after receiving accusations of institutionalised sexism. And most seafarers (of both sexes) still use feminine pronouns when taking about ships.
A couple years back saw an executive have this brought up to him. He didn't take it well. "F*** you and the horse you rode in on. You can look and see if it was a mare or stallion if you care." Fortunately for him he owned the company.
 

patient_ot

Active Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
113
Likes
81
Hmm. Too many things in one box the cause of the distortion? Very disappointing to see given the cost of the unit and the brand.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,368
Likes
234,394
Location
Seattle Area

folzag

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
99
Likes
131
Owner here. Wow, yeah. That is pretty disappointing. The headphone output I knew was a dumpster fire. I literally could not listen to it enjoyably. The noise is audible above the signal until about 3 or 4 on the volume level. (It goes to 50.)

I got a JDS Atom and connected it to the line outs. That sounded absolutely fine to me. I use the line outs into a pair of powered monitors and have been very happy with that as well. (Maybe I'm accustomed to mid-tier gear?) I didn't pay full retail, so that takes some of the sting out. I do like the fact it has internal storage and regular old buttons and knobs. It's a real shame there are not more units like this available. It also makes me wonder about the HAP-Z1ES. As an "ES" unit, that is supposed to have Sony's flagship engineering, though it doesn't have digital inputs(!), so is dead to me.

Thanks for the review, @amirm (and the whole web site!). I've always wondered how this stacked up in sound quality. OK, quick question: is it possible it's decoding hardware is not really up to the task? The design is about 6-8 years old now. If you reduced the bit rate & depth on SPDIF to CD Redbook, would it improve performance?
 

folzag

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
99
Likes
131
Hmm. Too many things in one box the cause of the distortion? Very disappointing to see given the cost of the unit and the brand.
That could well be it. Like I said, the headphone out is unusable, though the line-out I've not had issue with.
 
Top Bottom