• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Review and Measurements of SMSL M10 DAC & Amp

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,598
Likes
12,040
I had research the AK4497 DAC for a few times, it's 0dB is worse then the AK4490, AK4493, even low-end AK4452! Can I say the AK4497 is worse then AK4452 ? I don't think so ! I had compared then and the AK4497 win in every way!
Yes well, sighted listening tests are incredibly shallow, prone to bias and not worth very much..
 

DjBobby

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2018
Messages
10
Likes
10
Location
Swiss mountains
SMSL are confusingly inconsistent. They must have multiple engineering teams to be able to put out the M10 and also the VMV D1 under the same label.
They really do. There are units stamped with SMSL only and plenty of units with the VMV SMSL, or made for SMSL by VMV.
 

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,706
Likes
38,864
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
As soon as you take out the M10 out of the box, you definitely get the feeling that this is one hefty unit.

The casework looks solid (aluminium one piece?) and apart from the strange looking mini display and the offset balanced headphone socket, it looks pretty good to me.

Can you add weight to your reviews (the kitchen scales will do)? I think a bit of 'heft' goes a long way to get audiophile cred and also stops the lightweight ones from being pulled off the rack by the weight of the interconnecting cables.
 

VintageFlanker

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,997
Likes
20,081
Location
Paris
I had research the AK4497 DAC for a few times, it's 0dB is worse then the AK4490, AK4493, even low-end AK4452! Can I say the AK4497 is worse then AK4452 ? I don't think so ! I had compared then and the AK4497 win in every way!
Hum... What do you mean by "win"?

Sad AKM actual flagship didn't deserve a proper implementation yet... Maybe the Teac UD-505? I don't know. The new 4499 will be produced in April 2019.
 

cacliu

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Messages
7
Likes
2
pcb of course looks different. One is balanced the other is not. But the underlying electric properties are probably similar — they are all based on custom designed pnp transistor based class AB amplifier rather than use off the shelf operational amp.

They have very similar output impedance, too, which further suggests they are based on the same design.

As I konw the M10 i found was use TPA6120 x2 , and the output impedance just depends on the output series resistor ! It is very easy to change it !
And also I don't think this is a performace spec, for opa the output impedance always very small(<1 ohm) ! some guys use the output resistor to adapt the headphones, I had found that pic, you can see it clearly, there is a 22ohm resistor, if remove it ,the output impedance is very low!
 

Attachments

  • m10 output  resistor.jpg
    m10 output resistor.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 591

cacliu

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Messages
7
Likes
2
Hum... What do you mean by "win"?

Sad AKM actual flagship didn't deserve a proper implementation yet... Maybe the Teac UD-505? I don't know. The new 4499 will be produced in April 2019.

Musical, detail, sound stage, AK4497 better than AK4452
 

confucius_zero

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Nov 22, 2018
Messages
541
Likes
345

cacliu

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Messages
7
Likes
2
Alright. So nothing but your subjective impressions. ;)
"Musicality" remains a not measurable thing, by the way. ;)
No! The dynamic range (THD+N @-60dBFS), the AK4497 is much better, I had test one in 125dB, but the AK4452 just 115dB!
 

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,598
Likes
12,040
No! The dynamic range (THD+N @-60dBFS), the AK4497 is much better, I had test one in 125dB, but the AK4452 just 115dB!
The AK4497 in the M10 here has measured to 115dB unbalanced, 119dB balanced. Which 'one' did you test 125dB?
Because 125dB just so happens to be the claimed dynamic range on the datasheet..
 

confucius_zero

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Nov 22, 2018
Messages
541
Likes
345
The AK4497 in the M10 here has measured to 115dB unbalanced, 119dB balanced. Which 'one' did you test 125dB?
Looking forward to see the 125 measurement data... Could reveal some drastic sample variation on the units.....
 

cacliu

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Messages
7
Likes
2
The AK4497 in the M10 here has measured to 115dB unbalanced, 119dB balanced. Which 'one' did you test 125dB?
Because 125dB just so happens to be the claimed dynamic range on the datasheet..
You think I am lying? This is 125dB,and the datasheet is 131dB by the way! And in the AK4452, the 0dB is easily achieve 0.0004%! but the 0dB of ak4497 is 0.0007% even by using 2200uF cap for VREF!
 

Attachments

  • 0dB.jpg
    0dB.jpg
    183.8 KB · Views: 412
  • -6dB.jpg
    -6dB.jpg
    176.9 KB · Views: 360
  • -60dB.jpg
    -60dB.jpg
    171.4 KB · Views: 558
  • IMG_4019(20190109-184409).jpg
    IMG_4019(20190109-184409).jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 1,527
Last edited:

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,598
Likes
12,040
You think I am lying? This is 125dB,and the datasheet is 131dB by the way!
Just wanted proof :) this is from datasheet btw:

Dpcn06N.png


Your measurements are considerably less than the Min./Typical expected behavior, as seems to be the trend with AK4497 designs...
Also no offence but looking at all those floating caps might be your implementation as well o_O
 
Last edited:

maxxevv

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 12, 2018
Messages
1,872
Likes
1,964
You think I am lying? This is 125dB,and the datasheet is 131dB by the way! And in the AK4452, the 0dB is easily achieve 0.0004%! but the 0dB of ak4497 is 0.0007% even by using 2200uF cap for VREF!

I don't see any of the figures you cited in any of your posted pictures /screen captures. Sure you posted the correct ones ?
 

wadec22

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2018
Messages
319
Likes
242
It could be literally a rather flawed chip. We've seen absolutely zero "great" AK4497 devices so far.

i'm starting to think this as well. the maker of the RME unit hinted at it having issue(s) on their forums.
 

KR8NUX

Active Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2018
Messages
115
Likes
81
This Panther seems to be coming up every 3-4 reviews or so. Last was that Loxjie one. Both SMSL products have disappointed now.
 

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,598
Likes
12,040
i'm starting to think this as well. the maker of the RME unit hinted at it having issue(s) on their forums.
Yes I interpreted his comments that way, too. Let's hope for the best in the 4499 :D and lol, hope Topping doesn't waste too many resources on their D70 DAC that's to be released!
 
Top Bottom