• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Review and Measurements of Purifi 1ET400A Amplifier

It would have to be at a pretty high frequency to be inaudible and pretty powerful to burn out a tweeter.
Anything above 20 kHz will do, oscillations can easily be much higher than that, and at the full voltage swing of the amp (so way beyond rated power).
 
Anything above 20 kHz will do, oscillations can easily be much higher than that, and at the full voltage swing of the amp (so way beyond rated power).

Not likely according to the article you linked:
I am sure a 25 W amp can damage some speakers under some conditions but I don't agree with the notion that a bigger amp has less chance to do the same, not as a rule anyway. I assume we would likely agree on this point.

In Bruce Morgen's case, it could also be that his speaker's tweeter(s) voice coil happened to have relatively low inductance so they were more prone to the relatively high order harmonics resulted from clipping as that could result in excessive heat/thermal failure if the high order harmonic contents were high enough.

@Bruce Morgen, did the tweeter(s) fail quickly, or after a long listening session?

8 - Some Very Silly Myths

8.1 - The 'Oscillations' Myth

Since it is possible for an audio amplifier to oscillate at very high ( supersonic ) frequencies, it is widely assumed that this inaudible oscillation will silently damage woofers and instrument speakers in the same way that over powering does. So the story is often trotted out to explain burn voice coils.

FACT: The vast majority of woofers and instrument speakers are immune from damage by inaudible high frequencies. The very high self inductance of the voice coil at frequencies at or above 20 kHz means the current flow is small and no serious heating can happen. Look at the JBL 2226 impedance curve - it's over 100 ohms at 20 kHz [ 1 ].


  1. Damage to tweeters is possible and also to 'twin cone' speakers with copper caps or rings attached to the pole piece.
  2. High frequency oscillation at full power IS damaging to amplifiers. Smoke will appear as resistors and capacitors in output Zobel networks burn up and BJT amps will quickly expire as transistors fail from excess dissipation. Amps using lateral MOSFETs will normally survive such events with only slight damage. The causes of such oscillation lie with operator error and bad cabling practices.
 
so hopefully we can move on from an isolated incident that happened 45 years ago... :)

So "isolated" that a major speaker mfr. had to design and offer an accessory literally called the "Tweeter Saver" -- because so many low power 1970s amplifiers went into wildly destructive, inaudibly high frequency oscillation when pushed past their rated output. :facepalm: ;)
 
So "isolated" that a major speaker mfr. had to design and offer an accessory literally called the "Tweeter Saver" -- because so many low power 1970s amplifiers went into wildly destructive, inaudibly high frequency oscillation when pushed past their rated output. :facepalm: ;)
I think the article by @DonH56 is a good read, and I have nothing to add to what already has been written by him, me, Phil Allison and Rod Elliott. Let's get back to discussing the Purifi amp.
 
I think the article by @DonH56 is a good read, and I have nothing to add to what already has been written by him, me, Phil Allison and Rod Elliott. Let's get back to discussing the Purifi amp.

Don's article is about clipping. It doesn't address the biggest issue with clipping, that it introduces instability (due to the amplifier temporarily running open loop) and oscillation. And it is the HF oscillation that kills the tweeters.

Bruce is right. For those of us who were around selling gear in the early digital days when amplifiers didn't know what had hit them, there were a number of loudspeaker manufacturers who had to come up with tweeter protection really fast or be stuck with an insane number of dubious warranty claims.

And, now, the issue is far from 'solved'. People with low powered amps, be they class 'whatever' and expecting higher levels than the gear can achieve.

Sure, we can hive off a clipping thread, but clipping issues are applicable and can be discussed about any amplifier.
 
Last edited:
@Bruce Morgen, did the tweeter(s) fail quickly, or after a long listening session?

I've seen (and had) tweeters expire in an instant from high powered amplifiers that clipped and oscillated.
 
Don's article is about clipping. It doesn't address the biggest issue with clipping, that it introduces instability (due to the amplifier temporarily running open loop) and oscillation. And it is the HF oscillation that kills the tweeters.
Indeed. I was really addressing the "(Clipping) low power amps kill speakers, higher powered amps don't" myth. I agree the issue is more likely oscillation. This is relevant to the Purifi discussion in that one of the main things Bruno Putzeys has brought to the class D game is the thorough analysis and understanding of feedback and stability in class D amps.
 
@restorer-john brings up a good point, though again this discussion is way off-topic IMO. I did not consider amplifier (in)stability in my clipping article because I consider it a separate issue. High-frequency oscillation will almost certainly destroy a tweeter, clipped or not, almost instantly. Things like "motor-boating" and other lower-frequency instabilities can blow out other drivers. Heck, a full-power turn-on surge ("pop") can do some damage!

You may not have to overdrive an amplifier to have it oscillate; the wrong load (speaker impedance) can do it. It is also worth noting that clipping is not always as clean as my article indicates; some amplifiers will "fold back" or generate otherwise very ugly asymmetric waveforms (@amirm has shown examples before), and some will break into oscillation when clipped. My article only addresses a well-behaved amplifier that is overdriven resulting in a clipped output. Alas, not all amplifiers are so well behaved.

As @Julf said, part of the work Bruno et. al. did was to develop a thorough understanding of feedback and how it is applied, and misapplied, to make amps like the Purifi models well-behaved.

IME/IME/etc. - Don
 
How can we retrace this discussion back to be relevant to the Purifi 1ET400A amplifier?
Do we see a possible problem with HF oscilation with the 1ET400A design? We have seen hf measurements but not under high load?
 
How can we retrace this discussion back to be relevant to the Purifi 1ET400A amplifier?
Pretty impossible. :)
Do we see a possible problem with HF oscilation with the 1ET400A design? We have seen hf measurements but not under high load?
No, HF oscillation is definitely not an issue with the 1ET400A (or the earlier Hypex ones for that matter).
 
Pretty impossible. :)

No, HF oscillation is definitely not an issue with the 1ET400A (or the earlier Hypex ones for that matter).

I hope not as I have one each. Such oscillation issue under specific load conditions might have been more common in the old days, I would hope that the newer amps should be virtually immune to that in most cases. I would love to read even one review with measurements such as Stereophile and ASR's that encounter such as issue that caused trouble (including failure) with the amp under test, let alone speakers.
 
Have to say the Purifi 1ET400A sounds fabulous very crudely set up on the test bench here ;)

View attachment 29833
I only see the PWM driver...WHERE are the FINAL stage mosfets...(are those weird looking vertical boards chips) ?
PS : is the isolated transformer for FEEDBACK...? i know so many questions...The Patent talks about lotsa feedback from output (Negative) compared to input to keep the Load in Check...
 

Attachments

  • 20200729_185139-1-2048x1536.jpg
    20200729_185139-1-2048x1536.jpg
    242.9 KB · Views: 139
Last edited:
I only see the PWM driver...WHERE are the FINAL stage mosfets...(are those weird looking vertical boards chips) ?
PS : is the isolated transformer for FEEDBACK...? i know so many questions...The Patent talks about lotsa feedback from output (Negative) compared to input to keep the Load in Check...

Mosfet are on the bottom side of the board. The transformer is the output filter.
 
Which are the best Purifi amplifiers? I am looking at the NAD M28 are there others worth considering?
 
Which are the best Purifi amplifiers? I am looking at the NAD M28 are there others worth considering?
There is not that much between the various versions. If you want a multichannel version you could also look at the Apollo Audio offering which has the ET7040SA version beside the regular ET400A also as an option.
 
Back
Top Bottom