It's cs43130M which is supposed to be a higher spec one more similar to cs43131. Whether it's true or not idk. But the spec of 0.0001% thd was never met.Oh looks like they just took that straight out of CS43130 specs. They managed to hit the limit of the chip's THD+N with MU2Plus though so who knows if they did it again.
Idk maybe musiland just changed. As I bought mu2p. They apparently said 43130m as a customized chip and has thd of 0.0001%. The final product was also speced 0.0001%It's 0.0003% on the official page though http://www.musiland.cn/index.php?m=Product&a=show&id=31
Not sure where the guy got 0.0001% figures from, maybe a typo.
When accessing Web page from South Africa I don't see THD+N figures, maybe Web proxies are not updated yet. Not a typo. I took 0.0001% from the attached picture captured on Aliexpress.It's 0.0003% on the official page though http://www.musiland.cn/index.php?m=Product&a=show&id=31
Not sure where the guy got 0.0001% figures from, maybe a typo.
It is a typical practice on Aliexpress. They mix specs from other sources to look better.Idk maybe musiland just changed. As I bought mu2p. They apparently said 43130m as a customized chip and has thd of 0.0001%. The final product was also speced 0.0001%
Now even tho thd is corrected, the snr is obviously impossible to be 130db. 120db would be optimal.
No it has nothing to do with aliexpress. It's directly from musiland and also from official social media account. The screenshot was on taobao. I can find the original post from the official account if I want. I knew it the release from jun 2018.When accessing Web page from South Africa I don't see THD+N figures, maybe Web proxies are not updated yet. Not a typo. I took 0.0001% from the attached picture captured on Aliexpress.
It is a typical practice on Aliexpress. They mix specs from other sources to look better.
I am more concerned about 80-90% sound quality of MU2 and why. If it is because of removing voltage level switching, then fine. However there is no mention about deploying of SuperCLK100 anymore which raises my concern.
I meant portable specifically. You don't hear small details when there are noises in the environment. And I don't see any benefits using high performance audio on the road when there are other things that are more important.Ah I see we've come to the extreme end of objective side of things with 'SQ doesn't matter, EQ everything to make it sound similar' now lol. If only it were that simple, oh how I wish it so.
They hype up the 43130M not 43130 and it's customized chip to perform better. And it's a lie. And that's the whole point.Although it over-hyped the parameters, the relative 43130 THD+N is only 108db, they have done the limit, and did not do the wrong design, this is also a comfort.
Thanks for the link.Here are measurements of the MU2s and a comparison to the new MU2. http://www.soomal.com/doc/10100008599.htm
Looks like MU2 is the winner.
Please use Google Translate if you are not chinese.
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...asurements-of-hidizs-dac-and-amp-dongle.8707/Hi all,
The MU2S looks good so far but how does it stack up to TempoTec/Hidizs Sonata HD? That should definitely be the next USB-C/3.5mm test.
How did I miss that... Feel a bit silly now, thanks for the patience and making the obvious obvious to me lol.https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...asurements-of-hidizs-dac-and-amp-dongle.8707/
Already evaluated, quite bad, not even as good as apple dongle