If you look at individual harmonics at 0.5v it's phenomenal!Here you go:
View attachment 23016
1 volt:
View attachment 23017
1.4:
View attachment 23019
Doesn't seem like you come out ahead at lower values.
If you look at individual harmonics at 0.5v it's phenomenal!Here you go:
View attachment 23016
1 volt:
View attachment 23017
1.4:
View attachment 23019
Doesn't seem like you come out ahead at lower values.
Probably the red one is non oversampling and you skipped through one of them, maybe try one more time?Here are the results cycling through them:
View attachment 23020
Two of them completely overlap so not sure if that is right or wrong.
I don't see it in my measurements. Probably sw artifacts. I use hf player exclusive mode on my android phone.Is the little spike close to 1k-Hz a problem do you reckon?
Thanks for taking the time to measure the other output voltages
Some source of noise around 700 Hz. Could be noise from PC being let through. Level is well below audibility though so not a concern.
Here is the 1 volt setting with 33 ohm load:
View attachment 23021
It just stops earlier than 1.7 volt so again, it doesn't seem to have much value other than slightly lower noise floor.
It's best used as a dac.It is not as good as i think
I agree. If you have a Shure KSE1200 using this as a DAC with your Android phone is far more compact setup on-the-go. I hope they sell it via Amazon.It's best used as a dac.
db magix ac3 sounds pretty good too. Subjectively better than mu2 to my ears. Check that out.I agree. If you have a Shure KSE1200 using this as a DAC with your Android phone is far more compact setup on-the-go. I hope they sell it via Amazon.
I tried the type C version and it sounds worse than MU2 plus to me.db magix ac3 sounds pretty good too. Subjectively better than mu2 to my ears. Check that out.
Really? I found the mu2 sounds much more artificial. ac3 has better imaging and less fatiguing. But anyway.I tried the type C version and it sounds worse than MU2 plus to me.
I tried the MU2 once and it sounds differently from MU2 plus. However, I think both of them are better than AC3. The AC3 has weak bass so I think it may be related to insufficient power.Really? I found the mu2 sounds much more artificial. ac3 has better imaging and less fatiguing. But anyway.
Oh right. Firstly I actually have the mu2plus. Secondly, I forgot to mention that i used both mainly as dac. ac3 had excessive output impedance, that will explain the lack of bass control. Actually ac3 more power than mu2 but the output impedance limited the performance. When they are used as dac, problem solved.I tried the MU2 once and it sounds differently from MU2 plus. However, I think both of them are better than AC3. The AC3 has weak bass so I think it may be related to insufficient power.
The more you talk about 0.5v will just give others potential customers an impression that it is not performing well in higher voltages.If you look at individual harmonics at 0.5v it's phenomenal!
Why would i care? It is a fact. I don't sell or have any relationship with this product. I can say what i want.The more you talk about 0.5v will just give others potential customers an impression that it is not performing well in higher voltages.
Sure you can say what you want, but I don't think the SINAD is bad in higher voltages. Breaking a record at 0.5v is not particularly interesting. That's what I think.Why would i care? It is a fact. I don't sell or have any relationship with this product. I can say what i want.
Well. That's sounds ok to me.Sure you can say what you want, but I don't think the SINAD is bad in higher voltages. Breaking a record at 0.5v is not particularly interesting. That's what I think.
I can also say what I want