v200 has very low output impedance.Thanks. Do you know any similar sounding amplifiers with very low impedance output?
v200 has very low output impedance.Thanks. Do you know any similar sounding amplifiers with very low impedance output?
Oh you mean, you don't have the access to it. my badThanks. Do you know any similar sounding amplifiers with very low impedance output?
I don't know if you have access to it either which is yulong daart canary. I think you can buy on ebay. And it's a dac/amp combo even. It's a warmer sounding one. But distortion is low. More suitable to mid impedance headphones like planars or k701.Thanks. Do you know any similar sounding amplifiers with very low impedance output?
Yes, satisfied very much. It lacks THX's clarity and detail yet has a more pleasant, analog-like sound with high impact bass.How is your impression? Satisfied with the purchase?
I don't know if you have access to it either which is yulong daart canary. I think you can buy on ebay. And it's a dac/amp combo even. It's a warmer sounding one. But distortion is low. More suitable to mid impedance headphones like planars or k701.
I have listened to countless headphone amps in my reviews. I have not found one that is clinical, or one that is not. The main and only audible difference is that some amps run out of power and distort. That distortion in small amounts makes the music bright. The benefit of JDS Labs Atom and Massdrop THX 789 is that they have plenty of power and don't distort. To that end, what you hear is what the recording is producing, sans what your headphone is doing to it.Atom is a great amplifier, but I do not like clinical sound. I read somewhere that Atom sounds like that. Hence the direction of V200
But in real world, do we ever use more than 10mw. 1mw is often too much for many earphones. Dynamic range is limited by digital domain. 0db is the maximum output.The main and only audible difference is that some amps run out of power and distort.
What do these terms mean?Warmth, looseness, softness, graininess ... glossy, smooth and tight.
Well if you can hear it you will know what it means. If you don't hear it then don't bother with it.What do these terms mean?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_itWell if you can hear it you will know what it means. If you don't hear it then don't bother with it.
I'm being friendly here. So if you don't get it just ignore it and forget it.
I was debating buying one at work today but decided naw. I just bought the $500 Gilmore Lite mk2 in December, I have no doubt the THX measures better but the Gilmore Lite mk2 is no slouch.
I've debated sending it to Amir for review to see how it measures up but then I would be stuck on my Asgard 2
I currently have O2-amp and Sennheiser hd650. Since this 789 amp has received such high praises I was wondering is there really that much audible difference between O2 and 789? I mean is it completely different meal or more like just a little bit different flavour of the same spice?
Best measuring amp will sound glossy
In contrast some will sound dry or dull or grainy. I did blind tests with amps recently. I had no bias and the difference is consistently noticeable.
Everyone here would say no difference. But thx789 takes balanced input so that opens up possibility for balanced dac and gain better performance from dac(most people here still say no audible difference still).
Balanced dac has common noise rejection which is neat, but besides the possibility for 4V output instead of the unbalanced 2V there is no real reason it should provide audible difference whatsoever.
The components and cable seem high quality! Can you see in the write up a description of how its xlr pin 1 is wired? I couldn't see at first glance.Another alternative: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07B3GC...colid=W25DX4NAX94B&psc=0&ref_=lv_ov_lig_dp_it
They do have 30cm/50cm/75cm/1m variants.