Hi, can you or anyone make a brief explaination of this "current" and "voltage" thing? And why no benefit? Or at least gives some keywords/articles to understand. English is not my mother language, struggle reading something too techie/long >.<
Thanks
A classic analogy for basic understanding is with water, where voltage is like pressure and current is like flow. And resistance is like flow restriction (small hose, small nozzle). These amps have well defined maximum output voltages and currents - limits. Accept that, for a given amp, a bridged configuration provides double the output voltage swing, but no greater output current capability. That is, you can get greater maximum pressure, but no greater maximum flow.
When your speakers have high resistance, it takes more pressure (voltage) to get a particular power into them. Once you have enough voltage (pressure) for your speakers to reach the current (flow) limit of an amp, it cannot provide any more current or voltage or power. With higher impedance (resistance) speakers, you might benefit from bridged outputs, but with lower impedance speakers, you might hit the current limit before you can take advantage of the potential for higher output voltage. How to tell when bridging can give more power? When the amp does not reach its current limit for your speakers in direct, unbridged operation. Then it could deliver more current (and power) if it had more output voltage range, which bridged outputs can provide.
For the Salon 2, at 3.7 ohms, you are pretty close to the maximum power output capability of the 1ET400A, but not exactly. So you could get a little more power into them from a bridged setup, but not enough to make much difference in perceived maximum sound volume. Others might care to offer a more precise estimate for you, but how much is that extra dB worth?