Jimster480
Major Contributor
A custom dac implementation? Not sure what the purpose of that is.... DAC chips themselves are pretty cheap.
...Square wave response shows asymmetrical ringing:
![]()
I thought it was clipping but it doesn't seem so...
More custom-er is better-er, chips are full of digital nastiesA custom dac implementation? Not sure what the purpose of that is.... DAC chips themselves are pretty cheap.
A custom dac implementation? Not sure what the purpose of that is.... DAC chips themselves are pretty cheap.
I prefer symmetrical ringing....... literal looks a COMB thing ...
...
Square wave response shows asymmetrical ringing:
![]()
I thought it was clipping but it doesn't seem so.
Cyan may look more or less the same if feeding it a native DSD256 test signal.Here is Holo Spring with a 1KHz square wave via DSD256. Not perfect, but not nearly as bad as Cyan:
View attachment 23266
Cyan may look more or less the same if feeding it a native DSD256 test signal.
Amir didn't mention it is a DSD test signal. It looks like a 44/48k signal to me.So do you think the problem with Cyan is the DoP implementation or that the square wave wasn't properly generated in DSD?
Amir didn't mention it is a DSD test signal. It looks like a 44/48k signal to me.
The test signal was a PCM one at 44.1 kHz (or was it 48k?) converted to DSD128. I didn't have time to play with a higher bandwidth one....Amir didn't mention it is a DSD test signal. It looks like a 44/48k signal to me.
Hmm... That's a strangely familiar profile pic you got here...(ㅎ.ㅎ)According to the designer he used AES-17 filter therefore out of band noise is excluded from his result
+1sHmm... That's a strangely familiar profile pic you got here...(ㅎ.ㅎ)
Suddenly -1s
Now I can't wait to see the measurements of the Benchmark DAC3.
Oh, my god.Too young, too simple, sometimes naive.
A custom dac implementation? Not sure what the purpose of that is.... DAC chips themselves are pretty cheap.