• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Review and Measurements of Benchmark AHB2 Amp

Eetu

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 11, 2020
Messages
763
Likes
1,180
Location
Helsinki
Yes I know but would it be audible?
hypex nc 400 is 1200 euro
purify i don’t know for sure around 1500
the Behringer is 179 euro
and if so
would it be 10 times better.
i know the Accuphase is 60 times the price.
at low level so well beyond clipping the sound is not different
my speaker are only 86 dB.
so why buy the recommended amps
i can buy every 2 year when warranty finish a new one for almost 20 years
and Spend the same
i believe in class d Efficiency now with global warming etc but I also believe the technic will improve every year.
Yes, in hi-fi the law of diminishing returns applies and it's up to you if the cost is worth it. So 10% better is more accurate than 10x if we're throwing numbers around :)

The Behringer is below average of all the amps measured here with a SINAD of 77. The distortion products may or may not be audible, noise would be more of an issue if you'd had more sensitive speakers and/or a near-field setup.

The NC252MP is 470€ and NC500MP is around +-1000€ (Audiophonics, Hattor).
 

Pjetrof

Active Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2020
Messages
281
Likes
115
Location
Belgium, Antwerp
I m happy with my behringer when it’s broke I l buy something different but for sure nothing expensive.
if I see the quality you get for 179 euro.
i couldn’t anymore spend more than 1k for an amplifier.
why should I spend that kind of money
 

yyzsb

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2019
Messages
88
Likes
40
I owned the AHB2 about 3 years ago and sold it to keep an inferior integrated since I had a baby and lost my listening space. Today I am getting ready to buy 2 AHB2's for my office. It will be connected to the Benchmark HPA4 and DAC3 which I bought last week. The HPA4 is a phenomenal piece of equipment. I have owned various Benchmark products for the last 20ish years so I am a fan of their gear

I would like to get some advice from AHB2 owners here (I asked Benchmark already).

I have a half-foot Audience AU24 XLR cable between my DAC3B and HPA4. I also have a 3 meter Audience AU24 XLR to my current amp (which will be tossed soon or sold). I am not technical in EE so I am relying on the Scarlet O'Hara kindness of strangers path to guide me on cable selection

Benchmark recommends pro level XLR cables than can carry a signal at 24 dBu. I asked Audience if their cables can do this. The guy who responded to my inquiry did not know, though I imagine someone at Audience would know. What are the folks here using as interconnects? Am I short changing my setup by not having the much cheaper StarQuad cables from Benchmark.

I am also going to inquire with my speaker cable vendor if the SpeakOn connector could be added to whatever speaker cable I get. I am thinking an Audience speaker cable at this time.
 

RichB

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 24, 2019
Messages
1,955
Likes
2,622
Location
Massachusetts
I owned the AHB2 about 3 years ago and sold it to keep an inferior integrated since I had a baby and lost my listening space. Today I am getting ready to buy 2 AHB2's for my office. It will be connected to the Benchmark HPA4 and DAC3 which I bought last week. The HPA4 is a phenomenal piece of equipment. I have owned various Benchmark products for the last 20ish years so I am a fan of their gear

I would like to get some advice from AHB2 owners here (I asked Benchmark already).

I have a half-foot Audience AU24 XLR cable between my DAC3B and HPA4. I also have a 3 meter Audience AU24 XLR to my current amp (which will be tossed soon or sold). I am not technical in EE so I am relying on the Scarlet O'Hara kindness of strangers path to guide me on cable selection

Benchmark recommends pro level XLR cables than can carry a signal at 24 dBu. I asked Audience if their cables can do this. The guy who responded to my inquiry did not know, though I imagine someone at Audience would know. What are the folks here using as interconnects? Am I short changing my setup by not having the much cheaper StarQuad cables from Benchmark.

I am also going to inquire with my speaker cable vendor if the SpeakOn connector could be added to whatever speaker cable I get. I am thinking an Audience speaker cable at this time.

I use star-quad balanced cables from Bluejeans because I can order them in the lengths I want, they are very well made, and consider them reasonably priced.

https://www.bluejeanscable.com/store/balancedaudio/index.htm

You will not be short-changing anything from a performance perspective. If you want jewelry, then by all means spend more.

I bought SpeakOn connectors for the canare 4S11 cable that I currently use, but found putting them together somewhat difficult due to the double-thick cable. I ended up giving up on that project for now. If going SpeakOn, the Benchmark pricing is reasonable.

I am currently using these banana plugs because the tightening screws make them easy to secure. Something to consider for the speaker end.

https://www.parts-express.com/angle...s-poly-shell-and-insulated-thumbscr--091-3608

BTW, great setup.

- Rich
 

Inner Space

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
1,285
Likes
2,938
Sprellemannen, I'm not sure about that wiring scheme ... you're using the mono outs, but the right-channel stereo ins. I get that they're stock photos, showing the selector switch set to stereo not mono, but to use the amps as monoblocks, the input to use is surely the 1 in/mono in, on both units, which is on the right of the back plate, not the left.
 

Inner Space

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
1,285
Likes
2,938
Cool ... then I guess the amp works as a monoblock off either channel, not just the specified "mono in". Interesting.

I just read the fine print in your "Source connection/destination connection" table and it doesn't match your diagram. In writing you confirm you use the mono inputs, but visually you show the opposite.

***Corrected - thanks!****
 
Last edited:

yyzsb

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2019
Messages
88
Likes
40
Thanks for the posts.

I actually bought the HPA4 without hearing it. I knew it was not a gamble since I had owned a DAC2 HGC and a DAC3 HGC along with the AHB2. I upgraded from the DAC2 to DAC3 (in retrospect, not really the best use of funds) and sold all this gear when I lost my listening space. My main issue with the HGC was the volume. I found it difficult to dial it in, especially at low volume.

The HPA4's volume is brilliant for my needs, maybe my all-time fav Benchmark product in terms of sound. There are 256 steps of granularity and it is easy to get the correct setting. I also bought a Meze Empyrean headphones along with the HPA4 for late night listening. This was also a blind purchase and have hated headphones in the past. I got lucky and love these headphones. I have been listening with these headphones until around 3AM each night last week while my toddler was sleeping (wake up at 6-7AM). Now I am rather exhausted but I have a feeling I will do the same again tonight.

The cables are for my 2 channel rig that I hope put together this year. Listening to the THX circuit on the HPA4 + headphones removed any ambiguity I had about buying the AHB2 again.
 

Kal Rubinson

Master Contributor
Industry Insider
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
5,303
Likes
9,865
Location
NYC
so I am relying on the Scarlet O'Hara kindness of strangers path to guide me on cable selection
FWIW:
1590872485499.png

BTW, I am sure that your cables will be fine.
 

yyzsb

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2019
Messages
88
Likes
40
Thanks Kal. I am not the most literary or EE person. Does not leave much else but what can you do.

The Audience cables sound excellent right now, but I was wondering if I was leaving some performance on the table by not using professional grade 24 dBu cables.

BTW - We conversed about the Vivid Kaya 45 speaker before you reviewed it. Thanks for that. I decided to get the Yamaha NS 5000 instead. YEs, I did extensive demoing of all the speakers I was considering.
 
Last edited:

Inner Space

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
1,285
Likes
2,938
Thanks Kal. I am not the most literary ... person.

Neither is Wikipedia, apparently. "A Streetcar Named Desire" is a play, not a book.

Scarlett O'Hara (from "Gone With The Wind", which was a book) is remembered for the line, "After all, tomorrow is another day," which makes her my personal patron saint of procrastination, generally very useful for audio.
 

Lorenzo74

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Messages
343
Likes
311
Location
Italy, Rome
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Benchmark AHB2 Amplifier using THX technology to reduce distortion. I was going to request one for testing due to membership demand but to my pleasant surprise, the company volunteered to contact me and send not one, but two units! I requested the second one because of something I was seeing in the measurements that turned out to be my issue, not the amp's. The AHB2 retails for US $2,999 from the company direct.

The AHB2 is a very compact form factor, enabled by use of switching power supply to increase efficiency/density:

There is just a power switch in the front. It might be but I constantly reached for the screw next to it to power it on! Having the power switch be slightly different color or shape may help with this.

There are a set of LEDs that show the status of the amplifier. They are driven by an FPGA (field programmable digital logic) that monitors all aspects of the amplifier and shuts down the unit if stressed. It did so very quickly and efficiently in my testing. Usually this is done with purely analog or maybe a small microprocessor. As such, the coverage of scenarios that could damage the amplifier is much less complete than using the approach Benchmark is using in AHB2.

Here is the back panel:

This is a very minimalistic approach given the small amount of real estate available. Only input is XLR balanced which is just fine in my book. A gain switch allows the input level to be controlled so that you can just use an RCA to XLR adapter and still get full power (2 volt max in high gain). At the other extreme, the low gain setting is designed for professional pre-amps with lots of output, getting its max power at 9.8 volts. Using this scheme, the signal to noise ratio can be improved as you will see in measurements later.

For speaker terminals there are two sets: classic heavy duty banana jacks and SpeakOn. The SpeakOn are locking and provide the best performance. I lost about 3 dB of performance using the banana jacks due to less secure connect there. So the measurements you see are with SpeakOn jacks.

Another minor nit on that note: I had a rather cheap SpeakOn cable and its plug was just large enough to hit the silver screws that the sockets are mounted with. Typical round shaped SpeakOn ones are not an issue. Flush mount screws would solve this problem.

There is a switch for selecting stereo or mono bridged output. The latter quadruples the amount of power available and unlike typical bridging, according to Benchmark comes at no penalty in distortion! I plan to test this later as it has a minimum impedance of 6 ohm so I could not use the 4 ohm setup I used for this testing.

There is a very beefy AC mains cable with really nice locking tabs. Insert it and it stays put unless you push the two red tabs on each side. Nothing is more aggravating than the AC cable coming half-way lose from the IEC socket.

Being a proper company of course the AHB2 comes with full set of regulatory/safety/emissions certifications which is super important with power amplifiers given the high voltages and currents running around in them.

In use the AHB2 stays very cool for a power amplifier when it is idling, outputting little power which was a nice surprise.

As to THX technology, it merges a low-power but very low distortion amplifier with a high power but higher distortion amplifier. The distortion of the latter is not seen because it is producing so much power (so the ratio of distortion is lower). The general scheme is not new, dating back to 1980s but new implementation is. We have seen this in stellar performance of Massdrop THX AAA 789 amplifier which broke new ground in level of distortion and noise. Will the Benchmark AHB2 manage the same? Let's see.

Power Amplifier Audio Measurements
As usual, I start with my 5 watt output test using 4 ohm load using SpeakOn terminals as noted:

View attachment 26575

I hope your jaw is on the floor just like mine was when I saw this picture emerge! :) 113 dB THD+N in a power amplifier? Are you kidding me?

Look at the harmonic distortion. The worst case spike is below -130 dB! This is insanely good. Of course this type of SINAD (signal and noise ratio) crowns the Benchmark AHB2 as the best I have ever tested:
View attachment 26576

The performance was so good I literally had to rebuild my dummy load to get there. Even the quality of the metal used in the connectors matters to get to this level of distortion. I replace all my dummy loads with higher precision ones that have much less VCR (voltage coefficient of resistance). Resistor values can become voltage dependent creating distortions of their own. Up to about 105 dB of THD+N, it doesn't matter but beyond that, the VCR was the dominant distortion, not the Benchmark AHB2 amplifier!

It was requested that I show the breakdown and distortion so here we are:
View attachment 26577

Our best case hearing threshold is -116 dB SPL so no question that this level of distortion is totally inaudible. Separating the noise from THD, we see that it is noise that we are measuring as THD+N, rather than distortion:
View attachment 26578

And this is with exceptional noise performance of Benchmark AHB2 as we see in the graph of THD+N versus power:

View attachment 26579

Even in high gain, the AHB2 easily outperforms the DIY Hypex NC400 I had tested before which used to be the best amp I had tested.

We have 185 watts of power at incredibly low distortion of 0.00016%, besting the company specifications.

Note that the FPGA protection mode kicks in and essentially shots the amplifier down past the limit. You get absolutely distortion-less and noiseless performance until there is no more.

EDIT: here is performance in bridged mode using same 4 ohm load:
View attachment 26592

You get 500 watts of stunningly clean power. Protection circuit shut the unit down after that so it is quite safe to try. With a THD essentially matching the non-bridged mode, there is no reason to be afraid of trying this.

Intermodulation distortion versus power level shows the same story of clean power:

View attachment 26580

If you want to know what you get for extra money over bargain amplifiers, you can see the difference in the above graph. We are not talking about 5 to 10 dB but whopping 40 dB better!

I have had requests for intermodulation distortion using dual 19 and 20 kHz tones. Here is that:
View attachment 26582

THD+N versus output level looks far cleaner than anything I have tested before:

View attachment 26583

Even at the limit of our hearing (20 kHz), we have vanishingly low amount of distortion. The graph is exaggerated so shows a rise there but in absolute levels, despite 90 kHz bandwidth of the test, we have incredibly low THD+N of just .004%.

The sharp spike at 45 Hz in green shows the amplifier going into protection mode. So don't pump that sine wave continuously into it at 133 watts. :)

Frequency response is exceptional too as expected:
View attachment 26581

Since this is not a switching amplifier, there is no filter there allowing the bandwidth to go to 200 kHz and beyond. Lowest band of AM radio is 450 kHz so likely you could use the AHB2 for an AM radio transmitter! :)

Usually when we test switching amplifiers we see all kind of "interesting" things in their outputs above hearing range. The AHB2 is a classic configuration albeit, with a switching power supply so all is well and clean here:

View attachment 26584

My reference graph for the Hypex NC400 used an AES filter (by accident) so I ran the AHB2 both ways, with or without that filter. Using the filter (in green) so the two are equal, we see much cleaner spectrum below 200 kHz and of course, no massive switching spikes. Worst case spike is below -115 dB. In other words, the Benchmark AHB2 is clean even in the areas you are not looking! It is like a restaurant scrubbing their parking lot with soap and pad as well as their dishes. :)

My loose wires on dummy loads is not the best setup for measuring crosstalk but here it is anyway:
View attachment 26585

Where our hearing is most sensitive (2 to 5 kHz), separation is around 100 dB which is way, way more than we need. Despite the small enclosure, the AHB2 manages exceptional numbers here.

EDIT: forgot to run the classic SNR test in the original review:
View attachment 26636

Wow, assuming you play at peak of 120 dBSPL, your noise floor will be at -10 dBSPL! That is absolute silence.

Conclusions
It goes without saying that the Benchmark AHB2 breaks new ground with respect to performance of power amplifiers. Using it, you can be assured that any distortion that you hear is from other sources (speaker, source, content, etc.). This is what I look for in high-end audio: absolutely the best performance so no second guessing is involved. You buy once, and you are happy forever!

All of this comes from a company that is a model of transparency with proper and accurate measurements of their products on their site. And importantly, volunteering to have that data shown to be correct by independent sources such as us. Support form the company for me at least has also been exceptional.

Yes, $3,000 is fair bit of money but is pocket change in high-end audio. Sales tax is higher than $3,000 for most of those products! I hear a lot of talk from audiophiles to have the equipment get out of the way of enjoying the music. Well the Benchmark AHB2 at levels that assuredly passes full transparency. So if that is your moto, you better stop buying boutique products with no specs and independent measurements and get an AHB2. Everything you hear then will be what is in your source, not the dirty dishes that your amp my serve your food on.

Needless to say, the Benchmark AHB2 gets my strongest recommendation for power amplifier. The pink panther agrees, having hit the ball out of the park after I took that shot!

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

The comedian Chris Rock said it best: there is a difference between being rich and wealthy. If a wealthy person had as much money as I have, he would hang himself! So please donate enough money so that I can become wealthy using either:

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audiosciencereview), or
upgrading your membership here though Paypal (https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...eview-and-measurements.2164/page-3#post-59054).
This is just the pinnacle of Class AB and of all the rest.
so far...
 

yyzsb

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2019
Messages
88
Likes
40
I just bought some Star Quad XLR's from Benchmark to connect the DAC3B + HPA4. I also got a 15 foot StarQuad XLR for the HPA4 to my future AHB2. I have a feeling this $178 set of wires will sound just as good as my much more expensive Audience XLR's. I will use the Audience XLRs with my analog sources, tuner and SACD player to the HPA4. It should be an interesting comparison.
 

Habu

Active Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2019
Messages
219
Likes
534
Location
Montpellier (FRANCE)
Hello from France
It was already posted on the forum :

https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/ap...monstration-video?_pos=2&_sid=73894cdb9&_ss=r

STAR-QUAD CABLE - VIDEO DEMONSTRATION
Benchmark has recorded a lab demonstration that shows what happens when a standard two-wire cable is exposed to common sources of magnetic interference.
You will be able to hear the interference, see it on an oscilloscope, and view its spectrum on an FFT. A star-quad cable and a standard cable are exposed to the same sources of magnetic interference and the results are compared. This demonstration shows the dramatic difference between the two cables. The star-quad cable provided a 20 to 50 dB reduction in magnetic interference, keeping the interference below audible levels.
Note: The interference will play through the left channel while John narrates on the right channel.


https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/ap...-the-importance-of-star-quad-microphone-cable
 

Aerith Gainsborough

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
May 4, 2020
Messages
853
Likes
1,280
While that is nice demonstration on the effectiveness on microphone cables, people should keep in mind that the signals we use in audio playback gear are vastly stronger.

We do not have very sensitive mic pre-amps boosting the tiny 5-50mV output of a microphone up to 2V line level in order to then amplify these further down the chain. If you add 2mv variations to a 5mV signal due to interference, you will be able to hear that. If you add 2mV of interference to a line level signal of 2000mV, you won't.
 

yyzsb

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2019
Messages
88
Likes
40
I saw this StarQuad video on the Benchmark site. However, reading and watching about it and actually hearing it are different. I will be able to hear this myself next week after the cables are delivered. My guess is that I won't hear a difference. A audio designer on A'gon who helped me understand some of this, atmasphere, told me that balanced connections that support the AES48 standard should not have much variability in sound for different cables. Benchmark gear does support this AES48 standard on the DAC + HPA4 + AHB2. The designer's gear also supported the AES48 standard and he said cables do not make a difference with his gear. He said that the cables must have a minimum level of quality but that is still a low cost cable.

When I had Benchmark DAC3 HGC and AHB2 a few years ago I tried some Canare XLR cables I had received from Bryston about 20 years ago. I compared them to the Audience Au24SE XLR (or just AU24) cables and I could not hear a difference (as I am expecting with the Benchmark StarQuad). However, trying the same cables on a Parasound A21 amp I could tell a big difference in sound. The Audience sounded better to me.
 
Last edited:

Lorenzo74

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Messages
343
Likes
311
Location
Italy, Rome
You are totally right. Mic cable matters that’s why they are balanced.
I’m puzzle by all those "gold made" expensive RCA-RCA unbalanced cable easily surpassed in tough RF environment by balanced ones.
Speaker cables are another story. Make them of copper, the proper gauge and spend the rest of the money on drivers, caps and air core inductance. (Even if I‘m for crossover less active speakers...)
my Best
L.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom