• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required as is 20 years of participation in forums (not all true). Come here to have fun, be ready to be teased and not take online life too seriously. We now measure and review equipment for free! Click here for details.

Review and Measurements of Allo DigiOne RPI S/PDIF

Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Messages
9
Likes
1
#21
Hey Johan I've nothing to sell. I personnally use Roon with dual pc as source.

I was using digione home and i have 2 friends with digione (I'm not talking about signature here) and I compared with them Digione/DP3
In both system DP3 sounded better to our ears (4 different people).
one is:
etalon isolator RJ45---Audioquest Vodka rj45--- Digione or DP3---coax thot cable--- AudioGD Dac 19---AudioGD master10---PEL Alycastre S2 speakers

So I'm curious about DP3 measurements since Digione as also extremely good measures.
Maybe there is not only jitter to consider??? I don't know
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2018
Messages
43
Likes
48
#22
Hi Renan

I understand you have nothing to sell and that you consider this system better. Please note that many people find some types of distortion pleasant as sound.

I am not saying that your particular streamer has jitter , I am just pointing out that Digione and Sig have jitter thats close to the floor of measuring equipment . I cannot answer the question of " maybe there is something else except jitter" since this is called audiosciencereview :)

I also note that you are using a AudioGD Dac 19

Not sure if you are aware , but AudioGD DACs have been tested here on the forum and it has very low THD+N. I cannot find measurements of your particular DAC but like most R2R (including Soreen ) they have poor measurements (while being reputed to sound good) . It shows , again , that distortion is pleasant to the ears.

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...d-nfb-27-38-dac-and-headphone-amplifier.2486/
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...audio-gd-nfb28-28-dac-and-headphone-amp.5147/


In the end you like your streamer . I doubt that it will reach the jitter of Digione , but maybe, like you said, maybe it has something else that makes it sound good :).
I don't mean so sound dismissive , its just that everyone hears different things . Jitter wise , I think Digione will perform better.

PS .I found the DAC 19 measurements https://www.superbestaudiofriends.org/index.php?threads/audio-gd-s19-technical-measurements.4305/
Thats about -45db THD+N.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Messages
9
Likes
1
#23
Yes sound quality will depend on taste of people and measurement of Jitter is just a fact. This is why I'm curious about the jitter in DP3 considering what i heard from it.

if I follow your reasoning, the digione signature can not be better than the digione since the measurements of the jitter for the digione are already at the bottom of what we can measure?
Is that the case? ?

Considering the difference in souund, I never saw that a larger soundstage is due to distorsion. Usually I get larger soundstage if I do some phase correction or crosstalk cancelation....
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2018
Messages
43
Likes
48
#24
Renan33 ,

In fact I have designed a DAC with a THD+N of -110 and tweaked the output stage and increased distortion to -100 and everyone has the exact same impression..sound stage is larger.

To answer your question , yes definitely increased distortion can be perceived as wider soundstage.

As I said in the beginning , I don't mean to dismiss what you hear. Your streamer seems to work better on your dac .

Enjoy.
 
Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Messages
9
Likes
1
#25
Well we are just talking "science fiction " there since there is no measure of DP3 jitter.

You might consider that DP3 could also present a very low jitter.

Ok for your experience on distorsion and sound stage... I was not aware that distorsion could wider the sound stage...

Our comparison for DO/DP3 has also been done with a 1451 Soekris Dac (R2R). By the way the Dac19 is not the R2R version but a former one.

There is difference between the Dac with a sound more natural and to some point flat with Soekris and with more medium in front bor the audioGD dac 19. So I don't know which Dac is more distorded but the the comparison of DO/DP3 gave us the same filling.

I have a DO since it was on the market and I recommended to many people the DO. So I'm fully convince about what it improve in different systems.
For me the use as Roon end point is perfect and I cannot do this with the DP3. So let say that suddenly i got a taste for distorsion coming back.....

Finally, you did not answer me, if the DO is so low in jitter... what you really improve with the DO signature....??
 

franklin

New Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2018
Messages
1
Likes
0
#30
Hi Amirm,

Could you test the digiones with wifi on , let say playing a file on Roon with wifi ?
I am curious is there any measurement change when a RF transmission is working.
I think many people want to know this too.
 

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
16,166
Likes
11,351
Location
Seattle Area
#31
Hi Amirm,

Could you test the digiones with wifi on , let say playing a file on Roon with wifi ?
I am curious is there any measurement change when a RF transmission is working.
I think many people want to know this too.
Can do. I have a lot on my plate right now so remind me in a week or two if I don't get it done.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2018
Messages
17
Likes
7
#32
Thanks Amir.
I was one of the people who originally requested this so am very grateful. It does seem to be a bit of a moot point as to whether the Signature is really better or not (not just appreciably but better at all since it appears worse on some measures). I would be intrigued as to how bad a dac one would need for the output to be appreciably different between them. Of the top of my head I imagine it would have to have a really good conversion clock and a really poor s/pdif input not to swamp any differences
 

MZKM

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
37
Likes
25
#33
RMS level of jitter is 73 picoseconds.

That’s about 18Bit of dynamic range (10^12 / [48000 * 2^18]= 79 psec).

So, since jitter in practice is dealing with time delay and the J-test uses frequencies, can we use any of these measurements to state what the equivalent picosecond or nanosecond amount of jitter the J-test is using?
 

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
16,166
Likes
11,351
Location
Seattle Area
#34
So, since jitter in practice is dealing with time delay and the J-test uses frequencies, can we use any of these measurements to state what the equivalent picosecond or nanosecond amount of jitter the J-test is using?
We can only compute that for simple sinusoidal jitter. For other spectrums including the combination of jitter sources as we commonly see, the math becomes non-trivial. For sinusoidal jitter, 73 RMS picoseconds translates into distortion spikes that are -114 db down or 19 bits.

As I commented earlier, I don't think the jitter meter in AP goes much lower than that. I would trust the spectrum more than the single figure.
 
Top Bottom