Of course. To keep the ideal slope, you should only EQ it down by 2-3dB though.Is it possible to EQ the bump centered at 120 Hz?
Is it possible to EQ the bump centered at 120 Hz?
Looks great, though I would like to see it do better on the distortion side. Is it ok to compare to the Adam S2V? Please note different y-scale.
View attachment 52934View attachment 52936
Especially when its due to an odd (3rd, 5th etc) component as those sound much nastier than the even ones.I agree. IMO anything above 0.5% THD above 100Hz falls into less-than-stellar cathegory of THD performance.
Indeed, cant enthuse about its distortion performance.Looks great, though I would like to see it do better on the distortion side. Is it ok to compare to the Adam S2V? Please note different y-scale.
View attachment 52934View attachment 52936
At first I thought it was a clear case of bias, but after going back to the Genelec review I realised that the lack of dynamic capability in the Genelecs is holding it back.I get the impression by wording and the panther that you like these better than the genelecs? Why?/Why not?
Will be interesting to see how they compare to the much cheaper Kali Lp-6
Only in the deep bass, above that the Genelec distortion behaviour is significantly superior as it can be seen from both distortion plots.At first I thought it was a clear case of bias, but after going back to the Genelec review I realised that the lack of dynamic capability in the Genelecs is holding it back.
Especially when its due to an odd (3rd, 5th etc) component as those sound much nastier than the even ones.
A speaker can be spl limited by other things than out of distortion considerations. Amplifier power, thermal limiting, thermal compression, excursion protection etc.Only in the deep bass, above that the Genelec distortion behaviour is significantly superior as it can be seen from both distortion plots.
With Samsung ownership, it is not easy to get evaluation units anymore so I will have to buy them to test.