- Joined
- Jun 5, 2020
- Messages
- 5,091
- Likes
- 3,994
I don't want to watch the video. What did he change?
The crossover components and suggested adding no rez and tube connectors.I don't want to watch the video. What did he change?
The crossover components and suggested adding no rez and tube connectors.
I mean, what part of the frequency response changed?The crossover components and suggested adding no rez and tube connectors.
It was flattened a bit between 400-6khz and a couple of impedance notches were flattened out. Vertical directivity gained maybe ten degrees of stable width.I mean, what part of the frequency response changed?
To be fair the $419 includes solder.Don’t forget the internal cables, that made a ”huge difference”.
a buncha nothing..maybe the "no rez" had a small positive effect...The crossover components and suggested adding no rez and tube connectors.
To be fair the $419 includes solder.
What really irks me is how, to enhance his own credibility, he ropes John Atkinson into his nonsense as if Atkinson thought there were problems with the speaker, when in fact JA was effusive in his praise for the speaker's design and measured performance.
of course .. that's the ez responseInstead of replying, he simply deleted the comment.
More energy above 5k versus a relatively smooth Harman curve roll off. That's voicing not a fix. The more narrow blip as he says himself could be easily addressed with a notch filter eq if one thought necessary.Thank you @BYRTT. Honestly the on-axis does look a little improved. But, not worth spending the money on the upgrade because you could have just gotten a better speaker instead.
There should not be any "Harman roll off" though.More energy above 5k versus a relatively smooth Harman curve roll off. That's voicing not a fix. The more narrow blip as he says himself could be easily addressed with a notch filter eq if one thought necessary.
Roll off isn't the right word, it's a curve, and whether it should be there in a home system is subjective , it's not a pro monitor.There should not be any "Harman roll off" though.
It shouldn't be there in the anechoic measurement. And that's a periodRoll off isn't the right word, it's a curve, and whether it should be there in a home system is subjective , it's not a pro monitor.
If a flat 20hrz-20khz anechoic measurement is the only goal, then yes I agree with you.It shouldn't be there in the anechoic measurement. And that's a period