• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Revel M105 Bookshelf Speaker Review

OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,376
Likes
234,538
Location
Seattle Area
I'm a little concerned about the bass in the M105 blooming on and on.)
Bass response in your room will have nothing to do with what I am showing. The Room will massively modify them. I hope you are planning on using EQ for them (for these or any other speaker).
 

laudio

Active Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2019
Messages
291
Likes
294
Nice review, and very good preference score. After reading - thought these Revels might be the ticket in the future for an upgrade over my 530s. Then I looked at the curves. Think the 530s nail the in room response as well and have a better low end rolloff for a 2 channel stand mounter setup with no EQ in the loop - depends on your preference. I'll pass - and some money saved. Keep up the good work.


1594964743506.png



1594964784566.png
 

Attachments

  • 1594964757743.png
    1594964757743.png
    62 KB · Views: 110
  • 1594964772222.png
    1594964772222.png
    62 KB · Views: 111

nm4711

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
96
Likes
142
First of all: Great review and great speaker! I really enjoy the speaker reviews in general and also, that you dig down in the speaker distortions with the AP in the latest reviews.
I refined my speaker linearity test, reducing the output frequency to 80 Hz (from 200 Hz) and measured the speakers that are still sitting around my lab:
I have mixed feelings about the change from 200 Hz to 80 Hz in the compression test. 80 Hz is in a region, where a higher or lower port tuning frequency could have a major influence on the execursion of the woofer. This could be one reason, that the M105 plays louder than the M106.

You can see this in the distortion graphs:
At 80 Hz the THD is lower than at 95 Hz. This is likely due to the lowered execursion in the region of the port tuning. So at a 95 Hz the M105 would probably compress earlier. If you look into the distortion graphs of the M106 (not referenced here) you can see, that it has the highest distortion (and probably the highest execursion) at exactly 80 Hz (I only argue above the port tuning frequency). On the other hand the M106 is cleaner above 90 Hz.
So at 80 Hz it is likely, that you measure not only the capability of the woofer, but also an influence of the port. Just my two cents.
 

F1308

Major Contributor
Joined
May 24, 2020
Messages
1,053
Likes
905
Measurement location is at sea level so you compute the pressure.

Ph=Pr*(1-6.875585632/1000000*H)^5.25587611

Ph= pressure at H feet over reference r

Pr=1013.25 hPa or 760 mm Hg or 29.92 PSI at sea level, International Standard Atmosphere (ISA). True value changes.
Find it in weather maps, as it could go from as low as 860 hPa to as high as 1084 hPa [as recorded so far].

H in feet.
If H known in meters then make H=H/0.3048

If you are at 3000 ft [H] and sea level pressure is 1018 hPa [Pr], then your pressure is 912.37383 hPa [pH]

If still at 3000 ft [H] and sea level pressure goes to1030 hPa [Pr], then your pressure is 923.12873 [pH]

If still at 3000 ft [H] and sea level pressure drops to1000 hPa [Pr], then your pressure is 896.24149 hPa [pH]

No wind currents are accounted for, since those will change actual pressure on the basis of a new pressure amounting static and dynamic pressures. See Venturi effects.

Lots of gadgets out there [be careful] provide you barometric pressure at the touch of a button.
 

Hidde

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2020
Messages
15
Likes
19
Does this mean that using multiple smaller woofers would require less displacement and hence produce lower distortion?
Having a larger Sd will result in lower excursion. Using multiple of the same drivers will have larger Sd and thus lower excursion and thus lower non linear distortion.
You are making compromises though. More drivers tend to have directivity issues, because you can't place them all closely together. It's also more expensive and requires a larger enclosure.
Large drivers have earlier cone breakup and require a larger enclosure.

Solutions to the problem exist. Most common ones are ports and passive radiators. Another solution that, unfortunately, isn't used as often is motional feedback (also known as servo). There's also mechanisms like field coil drivers that try to correct for the BL using a magnetic mounting system similar to field coil drivers. Though they are unnecessarily expensive.
 

YSC

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
3,194
Likes
2,570
Looks nice but with the measurement isn’t we better treated with the Neumann KH80 DSP with flatter response, similar bass extension and no need for an amp? Seems by measurements alone those good actives are way to go
 

Koeitje

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
2,292
Likes
3,880
Great review @amirm

I find it strange that most every picture I see of Revel products, their badges and stickers are not straight. (I think the person who applies the badges in the Chinese factory needs their eyes checking)

View attachment 73686
You should see the ugly drill holes on the bottom for their stand...it's that my M106 sound amazing otherwise I would be complaining.
 

Sancus

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Messages
2,923
Likes
7,616
Location
Canada
Looks nice but with the measurement isn’t we better treated with the Neumann KH80 DSP with flatter response, similar bass extension and no need for an amp? Seems by measurements alone those good actives are way to go

I love the KH80s but they only have a 4" woofer. It's going to give up well before the 5" one in these, even if you have a sub. See KH80 vs KH120.

The Revels also have somewhat wider dispersion.
 

TimVG

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 16, 2019
Messages
1,181
Likes
2,573
EQ for smooth Estimated In-Room

1594973116472.png


For a flat LW we have to add an additional shelf filter (HS12, @2000Hz, +1,6dB) but this gives a rise to the on-axis response so I would personally leave this out.

1594973292770.png


1594973355565.png


@BYRTT - Would you do me the honor again of producing the interactive thingy :)
 

q3cpma

Major Contributor
Joined
May 22, 2019
Messages
3,060
Likes
4,416
Location
France
Very nice, but I expected more on the distorsion side from these supposedly godly woofers. 1% at 300 Hz at 96 dB seems a bit high to me, but it's not like we have enough references.
Still quite nice, and I love the looks; but let's be real, not made in the USA at this price?
 
Last edited:

BYRTT

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Messages
956
Likes
2,452
Location
Denmark (Jutland)
what surprises me:
- how similar it is above 100Hz compared to the f208 (it should be afterall, but things don't often work out that way)
- how similar the estimated bass response of the f208 is despite two large 8" woofers, i.e. -6dB is at 45Hz vs 55Hz for the M105.

Note that the M105 is specced for -6dB at 56Hz (close match to the EIRR), while the F208 is specced at 27Hz (really far off).
Overlaid animation but notice for cleaner comparison purpose F208 is offset -2,7dB..

1_M105_verse_F208_600mS.gif



Thanks review it was a pleasure to read Amir and enjoy more listening sessions now that it sounds so good and not need shipped back to another owner :)..
 

Koeitje

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
2,292
Likes
3,880
What effect does plugging the ports will have on distortion? Because from what I understand port tuning has influence on distortion.
 

Soniclife

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,500
Likes
5,417
Location
UK
Here is the same but at the extremes of SPL:

index.php


Once again we see that the distortion generator is the woofer with its larger displacement.
This is great. Is it possible to run it with a simulated 80hz high pass, e.g. a default sub crossover, I'm interested in how the midrange changes when no longer asked to do as much low down. I'm hoping it cleans up a lot, it's my impression from trying such things.
 

edechamps

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 21, 2018
Messages
910
Likes
3,620
Location
London, United Kingdom
@amirm: would it be possible to give the numbers for total Multi-Tone Distortion (MTD)? That would make it easier to compare. Eyeballing it off the graph is fraught with peril because the apparent level of noise between the tones can be affected by FFT resolution.
 

vkvedam

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 12, 2019
Messages
583
Likes
807
Location
Coventry, UK
Revel has been a revelation to me, I never looked into their offerings before. Being in the UK I prefer KEF though, pricing isn't justified for Revel charging more than what you could buy these for in the US.
 

NoAudiophile

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2020
Messages
25
Likes
61
I'd set these things on fire for that blip at 5kHz. Looks like poor quality control on the tweeter variation, or maybe waveguide bloom that was overlooked in the crossover design. How much do these things cost?
 

Thomas_A

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 20, 2019
Messages
3,423
Likes
2,408
Location
Sweden
The similarity of the Revels tested so far are striking. More energy of the direct sound at 1-2 kHz vs. 2-4 kHz, and also lower at 7-8 kHz.

M106_M105_M16.png



Comparing that to the curve published by Shirley et al, you get an approximate inverted shape of that in the Revels. Coincidence or deliberate design?

Skärmavbild 2020-07-17 kl. 12.05.09.png
 

audio_tony

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
568
Likes
690
Location
Leeds, UK
Does this mean that using multiple smaller woofers would require less displacement and hence produce lower distortion?

My understanding was that the change to multiple smaller woofers and narrower cabinets was to both improve imaging and reduce distortion, as multiple smaller woofers performed better than a single large woofer in this respect.
 
Top Bottom