• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Revel F35 Speaker Review

igufi

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2018
Messages
31
Likes
22
Note that the above is not an everyday issue as I use Dirac for room EQ for my system when it is normally being used.
Do you use the VST-plugin or a hardware based solution for Dirac?
 

AudioJester

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
942
Likes
1,251
The problem solved by EQ in the bass shows how little it takes to throw things off, and how simple it is to fix.

So will commpetent speakers be like non-brocken dacs? With eq and dsp they can all do the job and be hard to differetiate?
 

Webninja

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
419
Likes
469
Location
Los Angeles
@amirm

Any chance you’ll be testing a Performa3 or maybe a PerformaBE? The costs go up compared to the Concerta2s but I wonder what you get aside from deeper bass as you move up the line.

The BEs are getting great reviews, but they are in the same range as used Salon2!!

I have a feeling that the Concerta2s are going to be the best bang for your buck in the Revel line up.
 

Juhazi

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Messages
1,724
Likes
2,909
Location
Finland
Peculiar low end response... Hmm, perhaps it comes from NFS nearfield mic - rear port signal doesn't sum like it's supposed to. Tower construction makes this problem extreme?

Almost zero directivity with peaks around 1kHz - cabinet edge diffraction? Strange that they are so high in spl at extreme vertical angles too. Or is it port leakage again! Port output measurements, please! Handheld mic is ok for that!

index.php
 
Last edited:

Balle Clorin

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
1,345
Likes
1,216
Very interesting how disappointing sound of F35 and R3 were without EQ, Room effects seem so dominate over spinoramas,
I have done extensive in room measurements of Revel F36 and the results are very variable with positions.
In short the F36 are better than my existing speaker but some locations gives a massive 10-20db boost in low bass.

Prepare for information over load

First my room I can listen near field-6-8feet- in the front of the 20 feet long room, or far field closer to the backwall (12.14 feet).
r.jPG



Speaker element close .
close.JPG




Comparing existing speakers and Revel F36 at speaker position for existing speakers and far field listening position in sofa at back wall. The resaon for trying F36 is to get more bass and fullness to the sound, i certainly has more bass in the existing speaker/listening position. A bit overwhelming, and far more than spinorama suggest.
t-f.JPG


So lets continue with F36 far field( listener on sofa) and vary distance to front wall from 1.5 ft to 5ft,. About 4 ft seem best, but s massive room node boost at 32Hz
frontwall bass.JPG


Full spectrum
full.JPG



But what happens if I keep the speakers 116cm form front wall, and then vary mic position s few inches?
Dramatic effect...one position almost removes the 90Hz cancellation
115 mic pos.JPG


Compared with Harman I get much more bass sitting close to the back wall, (both loose some clarity and 3d perspective that I get mooving away from wall ,and to near field)
bass harman.JPG


Trinnov room correction can even out the bass, but not remove the 90Hz dip of course.
trinnov bassJPG.JPG


Smoothing out with 1/6
trinbasssmotth.JPG


Trinnov corrects bass and the valley at 300-600 Hz
trinov full.JPG


A summary so far , NO EQ or room correction, Bass boost at 32Hz node can be reduced by plugging the port.
The low bass extension from the port does not show in 1m and an-echoic data but is there in real room, my room at least at this positions
sum1.JPG


And now some near field listening. Speaker baffle 2ft 2inches from back wall. mic Mic 7-8ft form front wall.
near1.JPG


Comparison far end near field listening, no eq.
far near.JPG


Then some Trinnov correction near field and psycoacoustic smoothing. Black line = uncorrected, Blue= flat target Red=bass lift/sloped eq.
near trinnov spyc.JPG



After some more iterations I found an OK position with F36 speakers front baffle 2'2" from front wall and listening 6ft from back wall in my 20ft room(13 ft wide)
Left, right and both speakers.No EQ psycoacoustic smoothing
end optimal.JPG


Just a comparison of 1/6 smoothing and Psycoacoustic smoothing for reference, Psyco make things look better.
6-psycJPG.JPG


one final summary
end summary.JPG




NOW it is time to listen to some music, after 5days work

Added effect of bass port open and closed on F36
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    83.9 KB · Views: 152
Last edited:

Sal1950

Grand Contributor
The Chicago Crusher
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
14,187
Likes
16,900
Location
Central Fl
Fit and finish is superb. You could easily pretend to your friends you paid multiples of its cost.
I do wish manufacturers would offer the speakers in the least expensive fit & finish it is possible to make them in. I'd like to be able to purchase SOTA performance without paying for furniture grade looks. Back in 1978 I was able to buy my new La Scala's unfinished in raw marine grade plywood and then I finished them myself. You can't do anything like that with them anymore either.
Same goes for cars. Back in the day you could order a new base model Chevy with the highest hp rated bigblock, 4 sp, 410 rear end etc, and if you were really serious you could check the boxes for things like heater and radio delete to save both money and weight. Today if you walk into Chevy and want the top performing engine, etc; package on a Camero you also have to get the very top of the line interior, wheels, appearance packages too. :(
The get into your wallet coming and going. :mad:
 

renaudrenaud

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 20, 2019
Messages
1,309
Likes
2,872
Location
Tianjin
I do wish manufacturers would offer the speakers in the least expensive fit & finish it is possible to make them in. I'd like to be able to purchase SOTA performance without paying for furniture grade looks. Back in 1978 I was able to buy my new La Scala's unfinished in raw marine grade plywood and then I finished them myself. You can't do anything like that with them anymore either.
Same goes for cars. Back in the day you could order a new base model Chevy with the highest hp rated bigblock, 4 sp, 410 rear end etc, and if you were really serious you could check the boxes for things like heater and radio delete to save both money and weight. Today if you walk into Chevy and want the top performing engine, etc; package on a Camero you also have to get the very top of the line interior, wheels, appearance packages too. :(
The get into your wallet coming and going. :mad:
So you have to buy a bike. There is no things like line interior, heater and radio. Less pollution. Better health.
Well, I know, I know...
 

Juhazi

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Messages
1,724
Likes
2,909
Location
Finland
Balle, why on earth do you sit so close to back wall? Your postitioning is against all instructions! You get maximum of 30Hz mode and lots of cancellations in midrange! Ratio of direct/vs reflected sound is close to 0%.

Simply moving your seat to 345 yellow mark (for listening), would give you totally different and better sound without any eq.

index.php
 

QMuse

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
3,124
Likes
2,785
We make fun of subjectivists often but hey, maybe we should listen to them sometimes. So I setup the speaker to play pink noise for 24 hours. Then I played my favorite tracks again. Wow. I could not believe my ears. All the micro-detail and detail materialized. Incredible!!!

LOL This made me spill my first morning coffee! :D


Note that the above is not an everyday issue as I use Dirac for room EQ for my system when it is normally being used. I had decided to test speakers without EQ and that came to bite me given the circumstances.

In my opinion you should let Dirac EQ each speaker you're testing before listening. It will not take much time but I'm sure it would be worth it. You solved offending bass peak which certainly helped. Personally I would use filter with higher Q as shape of your fitler doesn't really match the shape of the peak -I suspect it should be at least 7. However, I strongly suspect that circled area consisting of 2 dips and wide peak should also be fixed as it certainly affects SQ. This measurement and circled area is also a warning to all folks who think that room affects only the area below tranistion frequency - this is simply not true as typically room affects, to a lesser extent but still very noticeable, frequencies up to 900-1000Hz.

KEF R3 Audio Measurements.png
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,747
Likes
37,549
Well we are told the low frequencies (below 200 hz if I recall) are 30% of how listeners rate a speaker. We also know below Schroeder (usually 300 hz or less in fairly modest rooms) positioning and EQ will effect response. So it isn't surprising that speakers that have reasonably good spin-o-ramas can end up ranked by how well the were fitted into a room.
 

MZKM

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
4,250
Likes
11,555
Location
Land O’ Lakes, FL
Maybe we need a new sorting category for the Speaker Review and Measurement Index table: 'After EQ'
Too many variables. For instance, bass response could be very deep or shallow based on room size (let alone placement), the EQ software you have will also heavily impact results. The most common room EQ’s (surround receivers) don’t usually let you change the target curve, so that’s another factor.

Above the transition frequency (say ~500Hz), I could add a note on how easy a speaker would be to EQ, but that should be easy for most to decipher from the Spinorma (DI and peaks vs dips).
 
Last edited:

QMuse

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
3,124
Likes
2,785
Golf panther for a speaker that "needs" EQ? That's obscenely biased! :p Come on, it's not even proper 3-way! :)
Anyway, I'm still waiting for a golfpanther awarded powered monitor for a decent price.

Every speaker needs room EQ. Some of them may accidentally land on a better position than other, but simple truth is that if you would like to get in-room response like the one predicted by spinorama you need to do room EQ.
 

Dimifoot

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
506
Likes
747
Location
Greece
Every speaker needs room EQ.
And subwoofer support. Two at least.

That’s why simple 2 channel DACs are useless, apart from headphone use.
 

Balle Clorin

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
1,345
Likes
1,216
Balle, why on earth do you sit so close to back wall? Your postitioning is against all instructions! You get maximum of 30Hz mode and lots of cancellations in midrange! Ratio of direct/vs reflected sound is close to 0%.

Simply moving your seat to 345 yellow mark (for listening), would give you totally different and better sound without any eq.

index.php
I tried every Position , the best are 120cm for speakers and 420 for listener or 67cm speakers and 245 for listener. I started far back in the «stupid» Position since that was the way to get sufficient bass with my existing speakers. And this is a living room also , not a separate listening facility. 345 cm sounds really bad by the way. No bass below 50hz and ugly cancelations. For critical listening I need too move chair to sweet spot.
 
Last edited:

Balle Clorin

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
1,345
Likes
1,216
I tried every Position , the best are 120cm for speakers and 420 for listener or 67cm speakers and 245 for listener. I started far back in the «stupid» Position since that was the way to get sufficient bass with my existing speakers
 
Top Bottom