Precise measurement doesn't necessary mean much at a listener position above Schröder frequency when we are measuring quasi-static soundfields full of peaks and dips due to local reflections and modes. Our hearing and brain there don't work as an quasi-omnidirectional microphone with a measurement window of i.e. 500 Hz but weighs more the direct sound, see also the posts of Floyd Toole
https://www.avsforum.com/forum/89-s...aster-reference-monitor-143.html#post57291428
https://www.avsforum.com/forum/89-s...aster-reference-monitor-143.html#post57293354
It is essential to note that this is the room curve that would result from subjectively highly-rated loudspeakers. It is predictable from comprehensive anechoic data (the "early reflections curve in a spinorama). If you measure such a curve in your room, you can take credit for selecting excellent loudspeakers. If not, it is likely that your loudspeakers have frequency response or directivity irregularities. Equalization can address frequency response issues, but cannot fix directivity issues. Consider getting better loudspeakers. Equalizing flawed loudspeakers to match this room curve does not guarantee anything in terms of sound quality.
When we talk about a "flat" frequency response, we should be talking about anechoic on-axis or listening window data, not steady-state room curves. A flat room curve sounds too bright.
Conclusion: the evidence we need to assess potential sound quality is in comprehensive anechoic data, not in a steady-state room curve. It's in the book.
and in more detail his (free to read) AES Paper
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/download.cfm/17839.pdf?ID=17839
The good thing is that loudspeakers with linear on axis response and smooth directivity behaviour create similar listening position curves which can have though different slopes depending on the room absporption behaviour and directiviy function of the loudspeaker. Equalizing above Schröder frequency to a random target curve is than just a wide tone control and thus personale taste, but not necessarily neutral, which is neutral direct sound.
That's why also good room correction tools try to weight more the direct sound in that region either by time windowing (for example Acourate) or spacial averaging (like Dirac), which I both own but after years of tests I barely touch with good speakers the higher frequencies.