Apologies if this particular point already has been covered, but I just finished watching
@amirm 's video on this and was kind of stunned when he put up the slide with Paul McGowan's public response. The technical misstatements and obfuscations are one thing, and the personal digs at Amir are not in and of themselves a big deal (thought they are offensive, gratuitous, and deflecting).
But some of what McGowan writes in the course of those digs at Amir is actually provably incorrect factually, and I very much doubt that any reasonable person could conclude that McGowan did not know those statements were inaccurate, or should not have known, when he wrote them.
In other words, some of what McGowan has written about Amir there is legally actionable - it's libel and defamation. I'm not saying Amir should pursue legal action - and I know that tons of frivolous and bogus defamation suits get filed in the US every year, and I am not a fan of that (to say the least). But just as a point of interest, to my eyes a person would not have a difficult time making a libel case based on what McGowan has written in this case.