Thank you! Yep. Its wild that so many people there refuse to believe the truth being presented, and even possibly believe they were duped as well. Feels like they are already too far gone.
Personally I think some of the character attacks on Paul M. have gone a little far (especially on youtube comments).
These days especially we are very prone to throw around the accusation of lying. The problem is that if someone truly believes something that you think is obviously false, their adherence to it, and defense of that belief, can look indistinguishable from lying. As in "he HAS to know what he is saying isn't true, therefore he's lying."
But in terms of Paul McGowan's perspective...even if we take for sake of argument certain products don't provide the sonic benefits he and his company say they do....it can still come from a different "belief system" than many of us hold here. Once we are operating outside the realm of scientific controls (which most of us are in our daily lives) anyone can fall in to subjective inferences that are very, very convincing to them. That's the nature of subjective experience.
If I recall correctly, Paul McGowan has for a long time been on the side of "listening ultimately determines the worth of a product." And has puzzled over some things that measure right, but don't sound right. Plenty of manufacturers in high end audio can start out with legit technical chops, but insofar as they make that mental move that "Ultimately I'm going to trust my hearing over what I measure" then they start vetting their results of their engineering ideas in a way - sighted listening- that can re-enforce their beliefs that they are doing something right.
I have no problem believing that Paul McGowan and many in his company are of this mind-set, and therefore really do have an honest belief in their product.
Well, what about all this obvious evasion?
Again...someone who truly believes something in a way we don't can make all the moves that suggest a sort of lying/evasion. If you believe something false you end up HAVING to do that to protect your belief. I've seen it a billion times before. I mean, you can see this even in the PS Audio thread - you have some reasonable folk pointing out technical issues, and a number of the PS Audio consumers evading the points left right and center. It's not because they are lying. It's because they hold a strong belief that may not be defensible in the face of facts, and this is what the mind does in such cases.
I do have some level of empathy for Paul McGowan at the moment. He's a business man, and I don't reject the idea he believes in his product, and it is coming under fire very publicly so he essentially HAS to do what he can both in terms of allaying his own cognitive dissonance and protecting the company.
So, yes I think he is being evasive on certain issues, perhaps sometimes deliberately, but I personally am cautious about assuming he is a pure, duplicitous snake oil salesmen knowingly ripping off everyone. I don't have a problem inferring he believes in his products.
On the other hand, PS Audio is suffering the risk you take when you are selling something that can't stand up to critical, technical scrutiny. Whether it's by design or belief...you are vulnerable to the expert who comes along and bursts that bubble.
I'd think a company like, say, Benchmark, is much less vulnerable to this "blowing up in your face" problem, and would likely be much more attendant to technical defenses/explanations of their product when scrutinized.