As with most audio discussions the dividing line comes down to "how much is enough". Most people here don't doubt the physics.
As far as FCC is concerned, if the equipment is good enough with a normal power cord, it is good enough with a normal power cord. If it needs a shielded power cord, then it needs to follow this part of its FCC report:
Of course, whether the FCC requirements are enough or not is up to personal interpretation. So I shall mark this as "Point of contention #1"
Most of the noise needs to be eaten up by the EMI filter anyway before the result gets low enough for usage with a normal power cord. And I would guess a couple capacitors and chokes are cheaper than a cable.
Next up is how far a high speed digital signal can travel down AC wiring and consequently the logicalness of the solution, which I shall mark as "Point of contention #2".
http://audiosystemsgroup.com/DigitalCableLoss.pdf
The author above has extracted data from cable datasheets. 4dB attenuation per 100ft @ 10MHz? 10dB @ 100MHz? That can be a lot or a little depending on situation. It is enough to screw over most computer interfaces for example, but Homeplugs have no problem pushing 2-digit MHz signals down your house wiring. And if your equipment is somehow 1dB too high from FCC limits, then that 1dB may be something to get rid of at all costs. But at this point it should be visible that a better EMI filter is going to a more practical solution.