• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Repairing The Questionable £25,000 Tom Evans Audiophile Pre-Amp

Actually, this is seller protection. (Risk management in a chaotic world.)
Seller can go to hell, frankly. If they're selling their product with a warranty, they have an obligation to honor it. They don't (or at least shouldn't) get to shirk it based on bullcrap like a broken sticker. They need to have actual evidence that the failure was caused by something the end customer or unauthorized repair person did.
 
This whole episode brings the value aspect of HiFi equipment into sharp focus. I think we all agree, the expectation of anyone purchasing a phono preamp for tens of thousands of dollars/pounds/euros would be high. When you're paying this kind of price, the buyer should be assured that the equipment is professionally constructed to a high standard. Even a boutique brand should be able to achieve this. Indeed, some of the other high priced phono preamps mentioned in this thread show these types of characteristics. A solid, well made enclosure and decently arranged and mounted internal circuit components. As to the actual circuit design and features, much of this is part of the "magic" as far as the buyer is concerned and well beyond their understanding.

However, ultimately, the basic components and construction are from bottom to top, electronic components mounted on a circuit board with (usually) discreet wiring to connectors mounted on an enclosure. That's the HiFi component distilled down to its fundamentals. As I have suggested in some of my other posts, this formula does not contain any component that would be called "expensive" regardless of the function of the assembled device.

Top level DAC chips, as used in many devices like the ESS Sabre ES9038Pro, cost around US$50. Obviously, this isn't any use unless it's incorporated into a PCB with an array of support components but as I have observed, some manufacturers aren't reinventing the wheel when it comes to circuit design. As with the Tom Evans preamp, it's common practice to simply incorporate the manufacturers sample circuits into your design, saving you a bunch of time. I believe DCS audio have followed this route with their DAC.

I know I've raised this before but ultimately, what is the actual unit cost of one of these HiFi component devices? If we're looking at the internals, there's some sunk cost in the design which can be quite substantial (having designed PCB's myself). Having reached the finished PCB though, with Chinese manufacturing using pick and place automation, these can be cranked out at very economical price levels. Subsequently, you see a lot of boutique (high-end.... groan) manufacturers enclosing this low-cost assembly in a massively overengineered, flashy enclosure with a big fat power transformer to add necessary "weight-equals-expensive" kudos. However, there's nothing new or novel inside, no patents have been applied for the internals are as close to generic as you can get. This example is around the $50,000 mark (for the pair!) Realistically, there's maybe $1200 of value in these with the bulk of that being the enclosure.

pass-x600.5.jpg


There's nothing special or massively expensive inside these amplifiers and I dare say, nothing novel about the circuit design.

pmcdrsvamqcgadcwsbbb.jpg
 
I hunted down this video after the take down simply because of all the "press" it had received.

It's built like something from a Jules Verne novel.

What's truly bizarre is it has to work with the most delicate of signals, the output from a MC cartridge

So to me, having to route this delicate signal thru stacks of boards and connection wires has the potential to introduce imbalance issues between each channel.. it would be hard with all the passive components and hand soldering to 100% guarantee the channel balance (let alone the potential for increased noise).

As with much of this hi end stuff, it's overly complex for what it needs to do.

My last phono stage was the Ayre P5x which I used with the cartridge wired as a balanced source in my fully balanced system and its a model minimal traces etc (like many others)... keep the signal path simple esp with MC carts.

1734644605752.png


Peter
 
Last edited:
It's built like something from a Jules Verne novel.
It's built like the prototype I'd have had in the development lab 30 years ago, and then only for circuit concept testing. Prior to developing into something actually manufacturable with adequate performance, quality and reliability.
 
It's built like the prototype I'd have had in the development lab 30 years ago, and then only for circuit concept testing. Prior to developing into something actually manufacturable with adequate performance, quality and reliability.
haha...

yep it has that vibe... a hi-end "bread board" (with added solder) that some how escaped the lab into the wild.

Peter
 
It's built like the prototype I'd have had in the development lab 30 years ago, and then only for circuit concept testing. Prior to developing into something actually manufacturable with adequate performance, quality and reliability.
Right, a Frankenstein preamp :oops:
 
The thing is top Japanese vintage (up till the mid 90s for ultra-high-end) had massive industrial might of R&D and economies of scale that would put any boutique manufacturer now to shame. I would totally get a Pioneer Exclusive or Sony ES or Micro Seiki totally recapped and refurb'd to spec. Modern Luxman and Accuphase are kinda there but not quite at the level of sheer insanity like seen in the Sony R1 line.

Back on topic, I would always understand and support anyone who buys the likes of Levinson, Jeff Rowland, Luxman, Accuphase for the haptics, aesthetics, intangible pride of ownership points, construction, parts quality and aftersales.

What befuddles me is the cottage industry gear that somehow costs MUCH MORE, and can find customers.
I have read in the past that the Japanese Gov. would give these manufacturers $$$$$$ for R&D and other things that help them build those really nice pieces of audio gear that were not sold outside of Japan. The US Gov. doesn't do that and the company's have to spend for their own R&D which limits them.
 
"YouTube does not mediate copyright infringement reports – This is a matter for the parties involved."
In that case, they should not take down videos based on a copyright claim, unless the claimant has a court order.

A claimant can easily hire a lawyer to send a cease-and-desist letter to the poster of the video, and YouTube should be prepared to forward those to the content creator. But a C&D letter is not a court order and has no force of law. The content creator can proceed as they choose, and if they really are in violation, the claimant can file suit. That’s how it works in print. But if the content creator really is plagiarizing copyrighted material, the longer they do so, especially after being notified, the higher the damages they will have to pay.

The issue I had with eBay was not about eBay just putting up what a content creator creates, but rather about what they presented as their own buying guide, which plagiarized my website. That made them the content creator. I didn’t pursue it for the simple reason that the damages I suffered were essentially nil, and thus taking them to court had no point.

When they take down a video, they are definitely inserting themselves into the situation, which is what I call mediating. What they are doing now is subverting copyright law into use as an unofficial (and indefensible) anti-defamation strategy that has basically zero cost to the claimant. Copyright law has always made fair-use exceptions for parody and commentary specifically to prevent it from being used as an anti-defamation tool.

Rick “follow the law” Denney
 
Always the same problem with these platforms, they do not apply the most basic law, neither local nor even less international. And drown out all freedom of expression as they publish a fllod of lies thousands of times every day.
Otherwise very disappointed that this expensive thing does not incorporate a crackle suppressor like the fm acoustics RESOLUTION SERIES 223 PHONOMASTER (the circuit is however a bit old, 2006...).
Concerning the prices, a Hermes bag costs $50 to make (in Asia no doubt) and resells for $5000. I have not (yet) investigated Rolex.
 
Always the same problem with these platforms, they do not apply the most basic law, neither local nor even less international. And drown out all freedom of expression as they publish a fllod of lies thousands of times every day.
Otherwise very disappointed that this expensive thing does not incorporate a crackle suppressor like the fm acoustics RESOLUTION SERIES 223 PHONOMASTER (the circuit is however a bit old, 2006...).
Concerning the prices, a Hermes bag costs $50 to make (in Asia no doubt) and resells for $5000. I have not (yet) investigated Rolex.
I can save you the trouble with Rolex.

The movements are made in a (relatively new) state-of-the-art factory on the Solothurnstrasse in Biel-Bienne, Switzerland. The cases are made at one of their case-assembly factories in Geneva. Various parts are made in their older facilities, such as the old Aegler factory overlooking old Biel, and bracelets at the old Gay Freres factory. Nothing is made outside Switzerland.

Generally, Rolex is respected by higher-end Swiss watchmakers because of their ability to sustain their quality and service model as cheaply as they do.

Rick “not a Rolex owner, but definitely a Rolex respecter” Denney
 
It costs more than10 000$...
I have not looked for their cost price. No need to defend them.
They proudly sponsor Perpetual Arts for example, what a noble cause.
 
Last edited:
Always the same problem with these platforms, they do not apply the most basic law, neither local nor even less international. And drown out all freedom of expression as they publish a fllod of lies thousands of times every day.
Otherwise very disappointed that this expensive thing does not incorporate a crackle suppressor like the fm acoustics RESOLUTION SERIES 223 PHONOMASTER (the circuit is however a bit old, 2006...).
Concerning the prices, a Hermes bag costs $50 to make (in Asia no doubt) and resells for $5000. I have not (yet) investigated Rolex.

I like how the more litigation $$$ you have, the more free speech you possess.

How very convenient!
 
You got it all. Merry Christmas !

I also liked it when Google kept pretending to be small innocent snowflake while raking in YT advertisement $$$ off the millions of Elsa x Spiderman disgusting softcore targeted at children until there was a huge public outcry to shut it all down.
 
Back
Top Bottom