J. Lohmann
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2025
- Messages
- 1,571
- Likes
- 664
Do consider even a bare-bones "terrible/meh/decent/solid/must-watch" sort of rating, because you seem to devour an amazing amount of movies. SF Chronicle used to have (maybe still does) little icons of a movie viewer: If the cartoon man was dozing, the movie was crap, but if he was leaping out of his seat and applauding, it was a must-see.I guess just ignore me like the other individual who seems to be offended by packaging artwork did; I only view films on physical media, as I do with music, but this seems to be shunned here, even if there's nothing to say about the film I'm watching.
You and the three others who liked your comment are going to ignore my posts anyway, so what difference does it make?
Also note that you're posting in the "refreshing movies" thread, so we're looking for good stuff here.You and the three others who liked your comment are going to ignore my posts anyway, so what difference does it make?
There are very few actors better then Clint Eastwood and all films are very interesting.Also note that you're posting in the "refreshing movies" thread, so we're looking for good stuff here.
Do consider even a bare-bones "terrible/meh/decent/solid/must-watch" sort of rating, because you seem to devour an amazing amount of movies. SF Chronicle used to have (maybe still does) little icons of a movie viewer: If the cartoon man was dozing, the movie was crap, but if he was leaping out of his seat and applauding, it was a must-see.
A Man Called Otto, with Tom Hanks, was quite good.
RIP SAM NEILL![]()
![]()
This has been a real ****ty couple of weeks, what with the news of Bonnie Tyler, then Lindsay Graham and now Mr. Neill. Couldn't believe when I heard about his passing; great actor.
Threw in this sci-fi/horror classic in his honor...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Well, here's one I did for another site -- it doesn't include "just images of the artwork and covers," but because that other member mentioned me watching a lot of films (which I do -- didn't know there was a law against that) and that this site is looking for "good stuff" (a stab at my taste in cinema, I presume; I thought THAT was subjective, as well), I doubt I'll elicit any kind of reaction.
Neither is it mine. Generally I don't associate refreshing movies (topic) with horror movies, at all. Maybe I'm wrong ...[..] Hollywood B-horror is generally not my thing, but lots of people must disagree:
https://cinemawasteland.com/
Neither is it mine. Generally I don't associate refreshing movies (topic) with horror movies, at all. Maybe I'm wrong ...
Watch the original instead yeah, it's seldom that USamerican are better than the original.A Man Called Otto, with Tom Hanks, was quite good.
Best in my view does not automatically mean refreshing. The latter is a movie I like to see again many times for many years. Alien for example certainly is a very good movie but I haven't seen it a second time, ever. I don't like blood splashing all over. It makes me sick.I disagree. Yes, horror movies are not my favorite genre, but currently they are some of the best movies out there. Just look at A24 and Blumhouse movies - no overblown budgets, basically no pointless CGI crap and compared to today's blockbusters, much better storytelling.
Yep. The Martian, Arrival, 2001, Interstellar, Passengers are movies you can always watch again. Same goes for love comedies like Email for you, Sleepless in Seattle, Harry and Sally, ...Ofc, this doesn't mean there are no great blockbuster movies e.g. Hail Mary.
Worst date movie ever.And I don't know about 'refreshing', but Obsession was a really good movie that I won't ever watch again, damn it was tense!
Like I said, wouldn't go noticed...I try to avoid sneaky stuff like backhanded compliments.
Hollywood B-horror is generally not my thing, but lots of people must disagree:
https://cinemawasteland.com/