Agree that cables from Gent are also nice and might be within the OPs budget depending on what length he needs.Also these from Ghent:
Agree that cables from Gent are also nice and might be within the OPs budget depending on what length he needs.Also these from Ghent:
I don't know for sure, but there is a "direction" to the cables which I think implies a floating shield?
The benefit of star quad? For me it's the flexibility when using a 1-3ft cable to connect components. The right angle is nice on my subs which keeps things flush against them.
Yeah, star-quad is great for EMI rejection, flexibility, and decreased handling noise due to the cotton yarn, all of which make it great for live situations. Of course, the cost is significantly increased capacitance. For such a short run it probably doesn't matter either way, but I'd probably order up some Belden 1505F or BJC LC-1 if I were making my own, or just use the 110 ohm cable I have for balanced purposes like Belden 1800F or Canare DA206.For 1-3ft there isn't much benefit of using star-quad even for true balanced connections, let alone single-ended as they don't benefit from SQ at all at any lengths. I guess the question is why the company makes single-ended cables with star-quad at all, I suspect they just use what they have for no real technical benefit.
Yeah the capacitance makes no difference until way beyond the lengths we use in our homes.Yeah, star-quad is great for EMI rejection, flexibility, and decreased handling noise due to the cotton yarn, all of which make it great for live situations. Of course, the cost is significantly increased capacitance. For such a short run it probably doesn't matter either way, but I'd probably order up some Belden 1505F or BJC LC-1 if I were making my own, or just use the 110 ohm cable I have for balanced purposes like Belden 1800F or Canare DA206.
That is my understanding as well.I suspect the shield is connected to ground on one end only, so technically the cable is shielded. For 1-3ft there isn't much benefit of using star-quad even for true balanced connections, let alone single-ended as they don't benefit from SQ at all at any lengths. I guess the question is why the company makes single-ended cables with star-quad at all, I suspect they just use what they have for no real technical benefit.
I still believe that grounding the sink/shield only at one end helps, as it's a common wiring technique used in industrial analog sensors. The direction is irrelevant, but it's important to ground the sink/shield at one end as to not promote a ground loop.I thought we were about to start talking about cable directionality.![]()


@Vasr Sounds like a custom order or DIY if you want to avoid adapters. You might get color coded boots, too.
Careful or you'll force all of the ham radio operators to watch your movie with you.I am thinking perhaps re-purposing my guitar patch cables I had when I was using discrete effects unit long ago replacing the 1/4' jacks with right-angled RCA might work for my situation. These are usually very well shielded given their use and are very flexible and space efficient because of the coil.
They look something like this. But then some audio wizards might start grumbling about those acting like an inductor because of the coils....
View attachment 86801
I still believe that grounding the sink/shield only at one end helps, as it's a common wiring technique used in industrial analog sensors. The direction is irrelevant, but it's important to ground the sink/shield at one end as to not promote a ground loop.
View attachment 86799 View attachment 86800
EDIT: Here is a better illustration of the grounding the shield at a single point.
View attachment 86804
This doesn't work too good for unbalanced audio cable as the ground remains a part of the circuit even if shield is grounded on one end only.
So, how about really short stack RCA cables ? (25 cm max). At the moment I know the Topping TCR-1 25. It looks nice. I just find it a little overpriced at 30 €, especially from a company that has built a good reputation on providing a great price/performance ratio.
Cheap shipping to France would be a plus.
One last thing : ANY mention to cable directionality (like these that were suggested on page 1) and other snake-oil stuff is a NO-GO for me. The cable itself may be the best in the world, but I won't support companies claiming that their cables do things that they don't. It's time we put an end to such practices. I'm saying this because I've found some nice-looking & cheap cables on eBay and AliExpress, but their recurrent mentions to snake-oil stuff discarded them all for me.
Highly recommend these: https://www.amazon.de/dp/B08BTPNVNK (or one of these: https://www.amazon.de/s?k=Worlds+Best+Cables+rca&i=electronics don't forget, free shipping from 29EURSo, how about really short stack RCA cables ? (25 cm max). At the moment I know the Topping TCR-1 25. It looks nice. I just find it a little overpriced at 30 €, especially from a company that has built a good reputation on providing a great price/performance ratio.
Cheap shipping to France would be a plus.
Sure, they look nice... but... I'm sorry to insist, but have you forgotten about this part ?Highly recommend these: https://www.amazon.de/dp/B08BTPNVNK (or these: https://www.amazon.de/dp/B089NM8S6Y
Look at both their pictures, with their huge stickers with "Signal source > Signal direction" written all over them...ANY mention to cable directionality [...] is a NO-GO for me.
There is a "direction" because the shield is connected at one end and not the other.One last thing : ANY mention to cable directionality (like these that were suggested on page 1) and other snake-oil stuff is a NO-GO for me. The cable itself may be the best in the world, but I won't support companies claiming that their cables do things that they don't. It's time we put an end to such practices. I'm saying this because I've found some nice-looking & cheap cables on eBay and AliExpress, but their recurrent mentions to snake-oil stuff discarded them all for me.
Well I understand not supporting bullshit, on the other hand the cable will.. work, fine.Sure, they look nice... but... I'm sorry to insist, but have you forgotten about this part ?
Look at both their pictures, with their huge stickers with "Signal source > Signal direction" written all over them...
So unless signal directionality has suddenly become a scientific reality, I'm afraid I just can't support that crap, sorry.
Sure, they look nice... but... I'm sorry to insist, but have you forgotten about this part ?
Look at both their pictures, with their huge stickers with "Signal source > Signal direction" written all over them...
So unless signal directionality has suddenly become a scientific reality, I'm afraid I just can't support that crap, sorry.