• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Ray Peat

Status
Not open for further replies.
There are plenty of studies etc that are censored ( mostly by govt thru the MSM) . "climate change" for example. Many are peer reviewed. Having said that "peer review" isn't foolproof . If the same corrupt "scientists" peer review a paper its essentially meaningless. And remember when "scientific studies" are funded by govt guess what happens? I'm sure you know. When i say censored i mean discredited or ignored by the media and govt (you know labeled "misinformation" or "conspiracy theory" etc) . Maybe we have a different definition of censorship or are talking about a different type of censorship. I'll leave it there
 
Having googled Weinstein for a bit, any discussion could become grubby pretty quickly. A no touch policy may be prudent considering the spirit of ASR's policies.

I'm disappointed that was posted here as if that rather unhinged person is an authority of some repute.
 
Last edited:
Inspired by the recent and welcome introduction of the policy on the use of AI, I've introduced my own policy to deal with instances of material reposted from the far-right white supremacist-owned disinformation hellsite known as 'X'.
I'm calling it "the ignore button".
Now can we please get back to the very important business of discussing the Peat diet? These delts aren't going to swole themselves.
 
Was Jay Bhattacharya censored?
When asking a question without context, it is crucial to provide the necessary background information to ensure the respondent can understand the question and provide a meaningful answer. Being mindful of this, you can ask me and others here on ASR any questions you wish if they are clear, meaningful, and respectful. This will foster better communication and understanding for everyone on ASR.

I can only assume that for some reason you are incapacitated, so any pointers as to what research you wish for me to undertake on your behalf is appreciated. Do you have a timeline and a word limit?

edit - should your malaise be in some manner associated with nourishment advice provided in this thread, it would be advisable to seek medical attention as soon as possible. Although, @mhardy6647 does provide some excellent tips in post #19.
 
Last edited:
When asking a question without context, it is crucial to provide the necessary background information to ensure the respondent can understand the question and provide a meaningful answer. Being mindful of this, you can ask me and others here on ASR any questions you wish if they are clear, meaningful, and respectful. This will foster better communication and understanding for everyone on ASR.

I can only assume that for some reason you are incapacitated, so any pointers as to what research you wish for me to undertake on your behalf is appreciated. Do you have a timeline and a word limit?

edit - should your malaise be in some manner associated with nourishment advice provided in this thread, it would be advisable to seek medical attention as soon as possible. Although, @mhardy6647 does provide some excellent tips in post #19.
It’s really not that hard of a question in the context of a thread debating censorship and conspiracy theories as it relates to science and the current establishment….

Answer if you like or eloquently and arrogantly deflect if you wish.

Edit: Honestly, after that response, I’m not that interested in what you have to say. So don’t hurt yourself over a crafty response.

There’s better things for us both to be doing today ;)
 
Last edited:
It’s really not that hard of a question in the context of a thread debating censorship and conspiracy theories as it relates to science and the current establishment….

Answer if you like or eloquently and arrogantly deflect if you wish.

I provided you with an opportunity to speak freely and you blew it.

The subject of this thread is Ray Peat and nutrition.

You were clearly not asking your question in good faith. That is quite fatal to anything further that you have to contribute.

You are a fool. You are dismissed. Go join @pinger and @monkeyboy in the sandpit.
 
Last edited:
I provided you with an opportunity to speak freely and you blew it.

The subject of this thread is Ray Peat and nutrition.

You were clearly not asking your question in good faith. That is quite fatal to anything further that you have to contribute.

You are a fool. You are dismissed. Go join @pinger and @monkeyboy in the sandpit.
Yeah lets stick to nutrition. You proved several times you are incapable of any kind of honest debate
 
I provided you with an opportunity to speak freely and you blew it.

The subject of this thread is Ray Peat and nutrition.

You were clearly not asking your question in good faith. That is quite fatal to anything further that you have to contribute.

You are a fool. You are dismissed. Go join @pinger and @monkeyboy in the sandpit.
Were you responding in good faith? Start there and circle back.;)

It really wasn’t a trick question, it just happened to be one you didn’t want to answer. That’s OK too.
 
I will answer: No Jay Battacharya was not censored. He published his opinions widely without being imprisoned, killed, or silenced. He was then elevated to the position of Director of the National Institutes of Health of the United States.

Safe to say that he has been rewarded for his speech, not silenced lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom