I've seen a few word salads in my short life. This one is quite tasty
Ha ha. What in my "word salad" is incorrect. ?I've seen a few word salads in my short life. This one is quite tasty.
I've seen a few word salads in my short life. This one is quite tasty
Ha ha. What in my "word salad" is incorrect. ?I've seen a few word salads in my short life. This one is quite tasty.
Ha ha. What in my "word salad" is incorrect. ?
There are plenty of studies etc that are censored ( mostly by govt thru the MSM) . "climate change" for example. Many are peer reviewed. Having said that "peer review" isn't foolproof . If the same corrupt "scientists" peer review a paper its essentially meaningless. And remember when "scientific studies" are funded by govt guess what happens? I'm sure you know. When i say censored i mean discredited or ignored by the media and govt (you know labeled "misinformation" or "conspiracy theory" etc) . Maybe we have a different definition of censorship or are talking about a different type of censorship. I'll leave it there
Was Jay Bhattacharya censored?I've seen a few word salads in my short life. This one is quite tasty.
When asking a question without context, it is crucial to provide the necessary background information to ensure the respondent can understand the question and provide a meaningful answer. Being mindful of this, you can ask me and others here on ASR any questions you wish if they are clear, meaningful, and respectful. This will foster better communication and understanding for everyone on ASR.Was Jay Bhattacharya censored?
You'll never get a straight answer from these dudes. They havent learned anything from the last 5 plus years. I'll leave them to their fantasiesWas Jay Bhattacharya censored?
It’s really not that hard of a question in the context of a thread debating censorship and conspiracy theories as it relates to science and the current establishment….When asking a question without context, it is crucial to provide the necessary background information to ensure the respondent can understand the question and provide a meaningful answer. Being mindful of this, you can ask me and others here on ASR any questions you wish if they are clear, meaningful, and respectful. This will foster better communication and understanding for everyone on ASR.
I can only assume that for some reason you are incapacitated, so any pointers as to what research you wish for me to undertake on your behalf is appreciated. Do you have a timeline and a word limit?
edit - should your malaise be in some manner associated with nourishment advice provided in this thread, it would be advisable to seek medical attention as soon as possible. Although, @mhardy6647 does provide some excellent tips in post #19.
It’s really not that hard of a question in the context of a thread debating censorship and conspiracy theories as it relates to science and the current establishment….
Answer if you like or eloquently and arrogantly deflect if you wish.
Yeah lets stick to nutrition. You proved several times you are incapable of any kind of honest debateI provided you with an opportunity to speak freely and you blew it.
The subject of this thread is Ray Peat and nutrition.
You were clearly not asking your question in good faith. That is quite fatal to anything further that you have to contribute.
You are a fool. You are dismissed. Go join @pinger and @monkeyboy in the sandpit.
Were you responding in good faith? Start there and circle back.I provided you with an opportunity to speak freely and you blew it.
The subject of this thread is Ray Peat and nutrition.
You were clearly not asking your question in good faith. That is quite fatal to anything further that you have to contribute.
You are a fool. You are dismissed. Go join @pinger and @monkeyboy in the sandpit.
Oh. I'm convinced.