I think you need to stop looking for conspiracies. And perhaps be slightly less credulous of what you read on line.They pushed out an experimental synthetic gene therapy on pregnant women and little kids...how do you think they were able to do that so easily...they have been doing it for decades....
which part of that statement is a conspiracy theory...I think you need to stop looking for conspiracies. And perhaps be slightly less credulous of what you read on line.
Conclusion, all science is nonsense….Do your own research sheeplewhich part of that statement is a conspiracy theory...
Experimental...check...they are on an EUA
Synthetic...check...they replaced uridine with methylpseudouridine, which is not naturally occurring (in the pfizer docs the "m" in mRNA stands for modified)
genetic therapy...check...RNA transfection is by definition a gene therapy, they modified the definition of a vax to have it qualify
pushed it on people...check...people lost jobs, were kicked out of the military, etc

What part of the pfizer docs makes you think mRNA stands for modified???? Could you give the quote and source please?which part of that statement is a conspiracy theory...
Experimental...check...they are on an EUA
Synthetic...check...they replaced uridine with methylpseudouridine, which is not naturally occurring (in the pfizer docs the "m" in mRNA stands for modified)
genetic therapy...check...RNA transfection is by definition a gene therapy, they modified the definition of a vax to have it qualify
pushed it on people...check...people lost jobs, were kicked out of the military, etc
surprisingly they actually say it in the wikiWhat part of the pfizer docs makes you think mRNA stands for modified???? Could you give the quote and source please?
(For info mRNA is a standard abbreviation for Messenger RNA and doesn't have anything to do with modification)
post 64 was as response to the comment on post 63, which itself was a response to post 60The comment contained in post #64 has nothing to do with anything mentioned in this thread. I have read the court document from post #58 including Attachment A and there is no reference to anything contained in posts #60 or #64.
I have no wish to speculate on the logic employed by this scientific enquiry on a thread devoted to a finer and robust appreciation of the Ray Peat diet.
post 64 was as response to the comment on post 63, which itself was a response to post 60
Not exactly. The Wiki page is a community maintained document about Phizer not a Phizer authored document so it is "we" that are saying it not "them".surprisingly they actually say it in the wiki
![]()
Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
also here
Long‐lasting, biochemically modified mRNA, and its frameshifted recombinant spike proteins in human tissues and circulation after COVID‐19 vaccination - PMC
According to the CDC, both Pfizer and Moderna COVID‐19 vaccines contain nucleoside‐modified messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein of severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by corona virus (SARS‐CoV‐2), administered via ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
from the wiki
The Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, sold under the brand name Comirnaty,[2][37] is an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine developed by the German biotechnology company BioNTech. For its development, BioNTech collaborated with the American company Pfizer to carry out clinical trials, logistics, and manufacturing.[38][39] It is authorized for use in humans to provide protection against COVID-19, caused by infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus.[2][40] The vaccine is given by intramuscular injection.[41] It is composed of nucleoside-modified mRNA (modRNA) that encodes a mutated form of the full-length spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, which is encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles.[42] Initial guidance recommended a two-dose regimen, given 21 days apart;[41][43][44][45] this interval was subsequently extended to up to 42 days in the United States,[41][46] and up to four months in Canada.[47][48]
Although it could be said the the very essence of science is hypothesis and testing of that hypothesis to either disprove it or strengthen it by failing to disprove. So science is continually censoring bad hypotheses as a fundamental principle, but I do agree it's very distinct from propaganda.I'll say one thing and leave it at that. "Science" that censors is propaganda , not Science.
Testing a bad hypothesis is not censoring. Censoring is not allowing or dismissing challenges to its current findings or theories or principles. I think we agreeAlthough it could be said the the very essence of science is hypothesis and testing of that hypothesis to either disprove it or strengthen it by failing to disprove. So science is continually censoring bad hypotheses as a fundamental principle, but I do agree it's very distinct from propaganda.
I'll say one thing and leave it at that. "Science" that censors is propaganda , not Science.
Where do they say that the m stands for modified?surprisingly they actually say it in the wiki
All I said was that Ray would look to older studies because he thought there was industry capture in the newer research...and I was called a conspiracy theorist...Pardon me? That is just smelly.
In the meantime you have destroyed the enjoyment of a thread investigating the scientific merits of a diet consisting of saturated fat (butter and coconut oil), huge amounts of pure sugar, hormones, and Vitamin B6 supplements.
Pfizer, in collaboration with BioNTech, has released various documents through the FDA and their own channels describing their COVID-19 vaccine (COMIRNATY) as using nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA), which is explicitly referred to as a type of mRNA. Below is a list of key official documents where this is discussed, including summaries of relevant sections on vaccine composition.1. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (2024-2025 Formula) Letter of AuthorizationNot exactly. The Wiki page is a community maintained document about Phizer not a Phizer authored document so it is "we" that are saying it not "them".
Just so. mRNA is an abbreviation for messenger RNA not modified RNA. The article is using the term modRNA for modified mRNA.
I'll leave it at that so we can have fun going back to more conspiracy delusions rather than picking apart the science articles![]()
All I said was that Ray would look to older studies because he thought there was industry capture in the newer research...and I was called a conspiracy theorist...