D
Deleted member 43957
Guest
I suspect his peers haven't visited earth since the first primordial ooze.Or can you point to his published peer reviewed papers?
I suspect his peers haven't visited earth since the first primordial ooze.Or can you point to his published peer reviewed papers?
Because it is anti science being presented as science. It is antithetical to the ethos of this place.Again, it's not in your area of interest, don't participate. I don't know why you guys are getting spun up about a discussion....
Think of it as a kind of civic duty to try to help the deluded.if it doesn't interest you, don't participate...so why would you care?
Peat was an incoherent anti-science conspiracy-theorist. How could I not care?if it doesn't interest you, don't participate...so why would you care?
It's not your area of authority to police the thread. The OP didn't break any rules by posting it, and we're not breaking any rules by calling it out as anti-science snake oil hokum.Again, it's not in your area of interest, don't participate. I don't know why you guys are getting spun up about a discussion....
you guys seem pretty worked up, but you never say what you think Ray and the bioenergetic crowd have wrong, and why it would be dangerous?It's not your area of authority to police the thread. The OP didn't break any rules by posting it, and we're not breaking any rules by calling it out as anti-science snake oil hokum.
I think the above-linked rational wiki site covers that better than any post here would..you guys seem pretty worked up, but you never say what you think Ray and the bioenergetic crowd have wrong, and why it would be dangerous?
wiki?...even the creator of Wikipedia thinks it's full of BS now....now I understand where you are coming from...no further discussion required...I think the above-linked rational wiki site covers that better than any post here would..
That link, once again, is https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ray_Peat
Au contraire, mon ami!Self-control has never been one of my strengths...
Ray tended to cite older works as he felt the research and publication industry had been captured by the pharma industry...hard to argue with that...
TouchéI see other threads in Information You Can Use called "Cat News" and "Medicare Advantage" and "Let's Talk About Food"- are those related to audio?
Where is Mr White when you need him?If you want increased metabolism at the expense of health, methamphetamine has a long-established track record.
/s
Actually we can, that's the whole point of this thread. Science demands we question causality, something adherents of this snakeoil avoid.Still cant argue with results,
Actually it's not. That statement isn't falsifiable, something science demands of it's statements.Ray tended to cite older works as he felt the research and publication industry had been captured by the pharma industry...hard to argue with that...
Actually it's not. That statement isn't falsifiable, something science demands of it's statements.
Bruh. You are in the wrong place for that kind of weak argument.
They pushed out an experimental synthetic gene therapy on pregnant women and little kids...how do you think they were able to do that so easily...they have been doing it for decades....Bruh. You are in the wrong place for that kind of weak argument.