• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66

MoFI 888 or Radiant 66 ?

Harmonic distortion at 96 db the radiant 6.2 are better than the mofi 888 at 86db except the 888 is a little better in the deepest bass at 86db than the 6.2's at 96db despite the 6.2 have lower overall distortion at a 10db higher spl
 
Last edited:
MoFI 888 or Radiant 66 ?

Harmonic distortion at 96 db the radiant 6.2 are better than the mofi 888 at 86db except the 888 is a lttle better in the deepest bass at 86db than the 6.2's at 96db despite the 6.2 have lower overall distortion at a 10db higher spl

I feel like there are some information lost in the above sentence (if it's even correct, I haven't checked). Stjernholm has tested the Mofi 888 as well, and in their SPL test, the 888 managed 116dB, the Radiant 66 managed 102dB. 2x6.5" vs 3x8".

So I don't know the facts for 96dB@1m, but the Radiant 66 will definitely have higher distortion than the Mofi at some point. :)
 
Harmonic distortion is measured at 86 and 96 db (sometimes higher but most people who want it loud including me, is more than okay with 86 db at 1 meter distance)
 
Harmonic distortion is measured at 86 and 96 db (sometimes higher but most people who want it loud including me, is more than okay with 86 db at 1 meter distance)

My point was simply that your post might be read as the Radiant having more capacity than the 888, which is not the case.
 
No it's just that even the small ish clarity 6.2's has lower distortion at 96 db than the mofi 888 (despite the size difference) has at 86 db but in the lows like under 40hz the mofi 888 is best

No harmonic distortion measurements of the clarity 66 but evene the small ish 6.2 is better at 96db than the bigget 888 at 86db

What would you buy the mofi or clarity's ? Isn't the clarity 66 superior over the mofi 888 ?

BUT BUT theres is a mofi V10 is they better than the clarity 66 https://www.mofielectronics.com/pro...s-sourcepoint-v10-floodstanding-speakers-pair
 
Horizontal dispersion looks good, with directivity errors at 750 Hz and 3.5 kHz. On axis frequency response is rather bumpy.
what do you mean by directivity errors ? the graph has limited information, only a 30deg and it is close to on axis even at the frequencies you list and the difference grows above 10k. Besides, these measurements are maybe not of the highest quality - indicates a straight gated measurement ands fair amount of smoothing on top.
 
I feel like there are some information lost in the above sentence (if it's even correct, I haven't checked). Stjernholm has tested the Mofi 888 as well, and in their SPL test, the 888 managed 116dB, the Radiant 66 managed 102dB. 2x6.5" vs 3x8".

So I don't know the facts for 96dB@1m, but the Radiant 66 will definitely have higher distortion than the Mofi at some point. :)
yes, we need a graph of HD vs level at different frequencies. 66 wins probably at 30Hz and 96dB but the big triple 8 beats it higher up in SPL
 
what do you mean by directivity errors ? the graph has limited information, only a 30deg and it is close to on axis even at the frequencies you list and the difference grows above 10k. Besides, these measurements are maybe not of the highest quality - indicates a straight gated measurement ands fair amount of smoothing on top.
The vertical difference between on axis and off axis should be smooth and either constant or rising with frequency. Here it goes back to zero twice in between.
 
yes, we need a graph of HD vs level at different frequencies. 66 wins probably at 30Hz and 96dB but the big triple 8 beats it higher up in SPL

It's truly impressive distortion levels you've achieved at 96dB and below (or I guess even 102dB and below) based on your white paper. Not sure how you did it. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom