QSC K 10.2 - that good?!

[Harryharryharry]

I was looking at the preference scores on https://pierreaubert.github.io/ and noticed the QSC K12.2 and 10.2 coming out extremely highly, for a standard looking £1500 pair of PA monitors.

8.2-8.6 with sub, 9-9.1 with sub and EQ?

Am I missing something here? Perhaps manufacturer graphs had a lot of smoothing that's effected the score?

Keen to hear your thoughts else I might have to pick a pair up!

 

[thewas]

Their spinorama (which is from QSC and not a 3rd party) seems to be extremly smoothed, which is reason of the high score.

A collection of loudspeakers measurements

pierreaubert.github.io

 

[ob1]

As pointed out in the data tab :

• Note: Data provided by QSC is of good quality but highly smoothed.

As such, I believe it does not make for a fair comparison when comparing with other speakers, say for instance those tested by Amir on the Klippel. Irregularities in the response, such are resonances are likely to be masked. It does give a general trend.

In sum, I would not trust the scores.